TABLE 2.
Study population breakdown
Author | Total | Nurse | Doctors | Residents | RT | Nurse practitioner | Other allied* | Not mentioned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mahramus et al | 73 | 23 | 0 | 18 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Sawyer et al | 42 | 29 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nishisaki et al | 265 | 122 | 0 | 78 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Colman et al | 165 | 110 | 9 | 16 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gilfoyle et al | 300 | 130 | 0 | 103 | 65 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Figueroa et al | 37 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
Tasi et al | 177 | 63 | 10 | 76 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Steinemann et al | 137 | 44 | 33 | 24 | 23 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
Chang et al | 275 | 128 | 0 | 131 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Miller et al† | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Total | 1471 | 672 | 62 | 446 | 262 | 2 | 21 | 9 |
Other Allied: ED technicians and physician assistants.
Miller et al did not specify participant breakdown but included trauma surgery attendings, residents, ED nurses, technicians, pharmacists, clerks and RTs.