Skip to main content
letter
. 2023 Mar 27;7(4):e867. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000867

Table 1.

Main Features, Doses, and Response Rates of MDS or MDS/MPN Patients Treated With Danazol

Age and sex
 Age at diagnosis (y, range) 69 (27–87)
 Female (n, %) 23/57 (40)
 Male (n, %) 34/57 (60)
WHO-2016 diagnosis
 MDS-MLD 28/57 (49)
 MDS-SLD 7/57 (12)
 MDS-EB1 11/57 (19)
 MDS-EB2 2/57 (4)
 MDS-RS-MLD 1/57 (2)
 CMML 5/57 (9)
 MDS/MPN (not CMML) 1/57 (2)
 MDS-U 2/57 (4)
Bone marrow features at diagnosis (n, %)
 Available core biopsy at diagnosis 43/57 (75)
 Hypocellular (cellularity <25%) 9/43 (21)
 Fibrosis MF 0–1 30/43 (70)
 Fibrosis MF 2 11/43 (26)
 MF-not evaluated 2/43 (5)
IPSS at diagnosis (n, %), only for MDS (n = 51)
 Low 17/51 (33)
 Int-1 34/51 (67)
IPSS-R at diagnosis (n, %), only for MDS (n = 51)
 Very low 2/51 (4)
 Low 21/51 (41)
 Intermediate 15/51 (29)
 High 9/51 (18)
 Very high 4/51 (8)
Blood counts before treatment
 Hb (g/dL) 11.1 (6.9–15.7)
 PLT (103/μL) 20 (2–49)
 ANC (103/μL) 2.00 (0.26–20.4)
Danazol dosing and timing
 Mean daily dose (mg, range) 500 (88–667)
 Dose reductions due to any cause (n, %) 19/57 (33)
 Median treatment duration (mo, range) 12.0 (0.6–149.5)
Concomitant treatments at danazol start (n, %)
 Erythropoiesis stimulating agents 5/57 (9)
 Corticosteroids 12/57 (21)
 Cyclosporin A 1/57 (2)
 No concomitant treatments 41/57 (72)
Response data
 Median follow-up (mo, range) 16.2 (0.7–171)
 PLT response (n, %) 29/57 (51)
 Median time to PLT response (mo, range) 3.3 (1.3–24.6)
 Erythroid hematological improvement (n, %) 10/24 (42)
 Neutrophil hematological improvement (n, %) 4/9 (44)

ANC = absolute neutrophil count; CMML = chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; Hb = hemoglobin; IPSS = International Prognostic Scoring System; IPSS-R = revised International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS/MPN = myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms; MDS EB1 = myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blast 1; MDS EB2 = myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blast 2; PLT = platelet.