Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 11;12(6):1185. doi: 10.3390/foods12061185

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Effect of SADE on average food intake (FI) and energy intake (EI) in P. obesus. LCD: group fed with natural low-calorie vegetable diet, LCD + SADE: LCD group treated with S. arabica decocted, HCD: rats fed with high-calorie diet and HCD + SADE: rats fed with high-calorie diet treated with S. arabica decocted extract. Results are presented as means ± SD for ten rats in each group. Means not sharing the same superscript letters (a, b, c, d, a’, b’, c’) are significantly different between groups (Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05). “a” denotes the highest value, and “d” represents the lowest value for EI. “a’” denotes the highest value and “c” represents the lowest value for FI. (b) Effect of SADE on average feed efficiency, FE in P. obesus. LCD: animals group fed with natural low-calorie vegetable diet, LCD + SADE: control treated with S. arabica decocted, HCD: rats fed with high-calorie diet and HCD + SADE: rats fed with high-calorie diet treated with S. arabica decocted extract. Results are presented as means ± SD for ten rats in each group. Means not sharing the same superscript letters (a, b, c, d) are significantly different between groups (Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05). “a” denotes the highest value and “d” represents the lowest value.