Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064776

Table 2.

Table 2 shows the results obtained according to IOS and the scanning strategy, within the same study group.

Trueness
(Mean ± Sd, μm)
Scanning
Technique
p-Value Precision
(Mean ± Sd, μm)
Scanning
Technique
p-Value Time
(s)
Scanning
Technique
p-Value
Dexis 32.4 ± 4.2 2 <0.05 57.0 ± 31.9 2 n.s. 170.5 ± 21.2 3 n.s.
iTero 30.1 ± 3.4 2 n.s. 60.9 ± 23.7 1 <0.05 204.5 ± 15.1 2 <0.05
Medit 23.0 ± 1.6 2 n.s. 21.4 ± 12.9 1 n.s. 127.6 ± 7.2 3 <0.05
Omnicam 42.0 ± 4.9 3 <0.05 25.2 ± 10.1 1 n.s. 125.2 ± 11.9 2 <0.01
Primescan 25.7 ± 4.4 3 n.s. 26.8 ± 13.7 3 n.s. 117.3 ± 19.0 1 <0.05
Trios 39.7 ± 6.6 3 <0.05 61.4 ± 28.9 3 n.s. 142.1 ± 15.9 1 n.s.

Abbreviations: n.s. = not significative.