Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064787

Table 11.

Univariate analysis of the association between the age of the respondents and environmental monitoring (subgroup a).

Environmental Monitoring Age ≥ 42
N (%)
Age < 42
N (%)
X2 (df, N) = [X2 Value],
p = [p Value]
pH X2 (1, 112) = 0.03, p = 0.86
Yes 37 (34.91) 26 (24.53)
No 26 (24.53) 17 (16.04)
Oxygen X2 (1, 112) = 0.90, p = 0.34
Yes 61 (55.96) 43 (39.45)
No 4 (3.67) 1 (0.92)
Carbon Monoxide -
Yes 66 (60.00) 44 (40.00)
No 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) -
Hydrogen Sulfide
Yes 67 (59.82) 44 (39.29)
No 0 (0.00) 1 (0.89)
Combustible Gas X2 (1, 112) = 0.17, p = 0.68
Yes 65 (58.04) 43 (38.39)
No 2 (1.79) 2 (1.79)
Ammonia X2 (1, 112) = 0.09, p = 0.76
Yes 52 (46.43) 36 (32.14)
No 15 (13.39) 9 (8.04)
Particulates X2 (1, 112) = 1.79, p = 0.18
Yes 57 (50.89) 42 (37.50)
No 10 (8.93) 3 (2.68)
Carbon Dioxide X2 (1, 112) = 4.70, p = 0.03 **
Yes 53 (48.18) 43 (39.09)
No 12 (10.91) 2 (1.82)
Biological Proteins X2 (1, 112) = 1.74, p = 0.19
Yes 43 (39.09) 35 (31.82)
No 22 (20.00) 10 (9.09)
Radiation X2 (1, 112) = 0.16, p = 0.69
Yes 53 (48.18) 38 (34.55)
No 12 (10.91) 7 (6.36)
LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) -
Yes 64 (58.72) 42 (38.53)
No 1 (0.92) 2 (1.83)

(-) No significance can be determined. ** Statistically significant result at p < 0.05.