Table 3.
CTQ-SF | 95% CI | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICC | LL | UL | F | df1 | df2 | p | |
Sum | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 8.80 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
EA | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 5.30 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
PA | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 5.30 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
SA | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 8.40 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
EN | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 5.60 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
PN | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 4.10 | 230 | 230 | <0.001 |
Note. N = 231, Number of judges = 2. ICC = Intra-class correlation coefficient; CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit, UL = upper limit; Sum = sum score, EA = emotional abuse, PA = physical abuse, SA = sexual abuse, EN = emotional neglect, PN = physical neglect.