Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065195

Table 7.

Comparison of the Mean External Assessment Scores between the Criminal Responsibility (n = 131) and Risk Assessment (n = 100) Groups.

CTQ-SF M (SD) t df p 95% CI
Criminal Responsibility Risk Assessment
Sum 39.34 (14.11) 42.29 (20.88) −1.215 164.81 0.226 [−7.73, 1.84]
EA 7.60 (3.97) 8.90 (5.85) −1.906 165.36 0.058 [−2.64, 0.05]
PA 6.63 (3.23) 7.90 (4.88) −2.247 162.39 0.026 [−2.38, −0.15]
SA 5.34 (1.59) 5.83 (2.89) −1.517 143.96 0.132 [−1.20, 0.15]
EN 11.79 (5.47) 11.6 (6.31) 0.235 196.00 0.814 [−1.38, 1.75]
PN 7.98 (3.33) 8.06 (4.00) −0.168 191.28 0.867 [−1.06, 0.89]

Note. Sum = sum score, EA = emotional abuse, PA = physical abuse, SA = sexual abuse, EN = emotional neglect, PN = physical neglect, CI = confidence interval. Tests were conducted two-sided.