Abstract
The nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) is associated with race/ethnicity but has not been evaluated among smokers in the African region. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a large randomized, controlled trial for smoking cessation among people with HIV (PWH) in South Africa. Urine samples were analyzed for the NMR and evaluated as a binary variable using a cutoff value of the fourth quartile to determine the fastest metabolizers. The median NMR was 0.31 (IQR: 0.31, 0.32; range: 0.29, 0.57); the cut-point for fast metabolizers was ≥0.3174 ng/mL. A high NMR was not associated with the number of cigarettes per day (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.70, p = 0.66) but was associated with 40% lower odds of a quit attempt in the past year (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.07, p = 0.09) and alcohol use (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06, p = 0.07). No association was seen with marijuana or HIV clinical characteristics. As we found only minimal variability in the NMR and minimal associations with intensity of smoking, NMR may be of limited clinical value in this population, although it may inform which individuals are less likely to make a quit attempt.
Keywords: HIV, smoking, nicotine metabolite ratio, NMR, South Africa
1. Introduction
Despite recent advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV remains a significant threat to global health, with 41 million people living with HIV and 1.5 million new infections each year [1]. In general, people with HIV (PWH) have a higher smoking prevalence than the general population [2,3,4,5], but they also have fewer resources for, and are less successful at, quitting. Smoking increases morbidity and mortality among PWH, who are already at high risk for smoking-related illnesses, including malignancies, tuberculosis (TB), heart disease, and other pulmonary diseases [6,7,8,9]. South Africa has the highest global burden of HIV, with an estimated 7.5 million PWH and an HIV prevalence of 19% [1], and 52% of men and 13% of women with HIV in South Africa are current smokers [10]. Given the racial/ethnic makeup of the South African population and the historical inequality perpetuated by apartheid, the burden of HIV in South Africa falls largely on Black South Africans.
The nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) is a novel biomarker that characterizes how fast the body metabolizes nicotine [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. NMR is the ratio of 3′-hydroxycotinine (3-HC) to cotinine, both of which are metabolized by the liver enzyme CYP2A6 [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. A higher NMR represents faster metabolism of nicotine and has been associated with a greater consumption of nicotine and a greater difficulty in quitting smoking [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. People with a higher NMR also exhibit reduced efficacy of nicotine patches for smoking cessation but a higher efficacy of varenicline; NMR has been evaluated as a tool to inform the assignment of treatment with these pharmacotherapies [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Existing research on NMR, which has predominantly been conducted in the United States, indicates that African Americans appear to have lower NMR, compared to those of Caucasian descent, but no studies have been conducted on the African continent, nor in other low- and middle-resource settings [12,13,18]. Describing the NMR in the South African population, especially among PWH, may determine whether this biomarker can be used to inform smoking cessation strategies in this population. This present study aims to evaluate the variability of NMR and its association with sociodemographic, tobacco use, and clinical characteristics among PWH in South Africa.
2. Materials and Methods
We evaluated baseline data from a randomized, controlled trial for smoking cessation among PWH in South Africa. Ethics approval for the primary randomized control trial was provided by the University of Witwatersrand Ethics Committee and the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board. Approval for the current analysis of urine samples was approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the randomized control trial.
The primary randomized, controlled trial consisted of behavioral counseling versus behavioral counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy [19]. Briefly, a total of 561 participants were recruited from three HIV clinics in Matlosana, South Africa: Grace Mokgomo, Jouberton, and Tshepong HIV Wellness Clinic. Located in the Northwest Province in central South Africa, Matlosana is a peri-urban district, with a population of approximately 425,000 and an HIV antenatal prevalence of 30% [20]. Participants were eligible for the randomized, controlled trial if they were at least 18 years of age, current daily smokers, and had an HIV infection. Participants were excluded from the primary trial if they had a history of adverse interactions with nicotine replacement therapy or if they were currently using smokeless tobacco, electronic cigarettes, or other nicotine replacement therapies. Self-reported smoking was biochemically verified with a point-of-care urine cotinine test and an exhaled breath carbon monoxide (CO).
At baseline, sociodemographic and smoking behaviors, including sex, age, employment status, education, and household income, were collected. Smoking behavior variables included the average number of cigarettes per day, time from last cigarette, time from waking to first cigarette, and secondhand smoke exposure at work and home. Responses were used to calculate the Heaviness of Smoking Index as a measure of nicotine addiction [21]. Alcohol misuse was characterized using the CAGE Substance Abuse Screening Tool [22], and participants self-reported current marijuana use. A urine sample was collected from all consenting participants. Urine samples were analyzed for NMR at the University of Witwatersrand Clinical Laboratory Services in Johannesburg, South Africa by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) using a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Laboratory Protocol [23]. Consistent with methods in literature [24,25,26], and to account for the potential difference in the range of NMR levels in this racial/ethnically homogenous population, NMR levels were evaluated as a dichotomized variable (high versus normal metabolizers), using a cut-off of the fourth quartile, as well as a log-transformed continuous variable.
Statistical Analysis
Sociodemographic, smoking, and clinical characteristics were described using the median and the interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and counts, with percentages for categorical variables. We compared fast to normal nicotine metabolizers using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the Chi (ꭓ2) squared test of independence for categorical variables. The associations between sociodemographic, smoking, and clinical characteristics and high (versus normal) NMR were evaluated using univariate logistic regression; odds ratios (OR) were reported alongside their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Associations between NMR as a log-transformed continuous variable and characteristics of interest were evaluated using univariate linear regression models. Stratified analysis was also used to evaluate measures of association separately for males and females. All tests presented were two-sided, with a p-value of 0.05 considered statistically significant. The R software (version 4.2.1) was used to conduct all statistical analyses.
3. Results
Of the 561 participants in the primary trial, 438 consented to provide urine samples and were included in this analysis. We found no difference in sociodemographic, tobacco use, or clinical characteristics between those included in this analysis and those in the primary trial (Table 1). Most participants were males (n = 343; 76%), under the age of 40 years (n = 190; 57%), had less than a 12th grade education (n = 366; 84%), were unemployed (n = 324; 66%), and had a monthly family income of less than ZAR 1000, or approximately USD 58 (n = 183; 42%). Among those with viral load data, most participants had a viral load >200 copies/mL (n = 54; 75%) and a CD4+ T cell count between 200–500 cells/µL (n= 138; 50%), and most participants did not have TB (n = 419; 96%). At the time of data collection, n = 203 (84%) participants were not on antiretroviral therapy. Most participants also showed moderate addiction to tobacco (n = 330; 76%) and alcohol misuse (n = 236; 79%), as defined by the Heaviness of Smoking Index and the CAGE substance abuse tool, respectively. The median NMR was 0.3174 ng/mL (IQR: O.31, 0.32, range: 0.29–0.57); we classified the bottom 75% of the sample (n = 328) as normal metabolizers (<0.3174 ng/mL) and the top 25% of the sample (n = 110) as fast metabolizers (≥0.3174 ng/mL), given that the variability in measurements was predominantly in the top quartile of values.
Table 1.
Total (n = 561) |
Total with Urine (n = 438) |
Normal NMR (<0.3174) (n = 328) |
High NMR (≥0.3174) (n = 110) |
p-Value | Univariate OR (95% CI) |
p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sociodemographic | |||||||
Sex | |||||||
Female | 123 (22) | 95 (22) | 71 (22) | 24 (22) | 1.00 | REF | |
Male | 438 (78) | 343 (78) | 257 (78) | 86 (78) | 0.98 (0.59, 1.69) | 0.96 | |
Age, median (IQR) | 38 (31, 46) | 38 (31, 45) | 38 (31, 45) | 37 (30, 46) | 0.63 | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 0.49 |
Age | |||||||
<40 | 317 (57) | 247 (57) | 181 (55) | 66 (60) | 0.60 | REF | |
≥40 | 243 (43) | 190 (43) | 146 (45) | 44 (40) | 0.83 (0.53, 1.28) | 0.39 | |
Education | |||||||
Below 12th grade | 472 (84) | 366 (84) | 281 (86) | 85 (77) | 0.06 | REF | |
12th grade or above | 89 (16) | 72 (16) | 47 (14) | 25 (23) | 1.76 (1.01, 3.0) | 0.04 | |
Employment | |||||||
Unemployed | 416 (74) | 324 (74) | 243 (74) | 81 (74) | 1.00 | REF | |
Employed | 145 (26) | 114 (26) | 85 (26) | 29 (26) | 1.02 (0.62, 1.66) | 0.93 | |
Total monthly family income | |||||||
≤1000 R | 234 (42) | 183 (42) | 133 (41) | 50 (45) | 0.44 | REF | |
>1000 R | 326 (58) | 254 (58) | 194 (59) | 60 (55) | 0.82 (0.53, 1.27) | 0.38 | |
Tobacco Use Behavior | |||||||
Heaviness of Smoking Index | |||||||
Low addiction | 144 (26) | 107 (24) | 82 (25) | 25 (23) | 0.71 | REF | |
Moderate addiction | 416 (74) | 330 (76) | 245 (75) | 85 (77) | 1.14 (0.69, 1.92) | 0.62 | |
Cigarettes per day | |||||||
<10 cigarettes | 277 (49) | 207 (47) | 157 (48) | 50 (45) | 0.74 | REF | |
≥10 cigarettes | 284 (51) | 231 (53) | 171 (52) | 60 (55) | 1.10 (0.71, 1.70) | 0.66 | |
Motivation to quit smoking, median (IQR) | 10 (9, 10) | 10 (8, 10) | 10 (8, 10) | 10 (8, 10) | 0.84 | 1.05 (0.92, 1.21) | 0.51 |
Quit attempt in the past year | |||||||
No | 213 (38) | 158 (36) | 111 (34) | 47 (43) | 0.12 | REF | |
Yes | 348 (62) | 280 (64) | 217 (66) | 63 (57) | 0.69 (0.44, 1.07) | 0.09 | |
Exposed to secondhand smoke at home | |||||||
No | 378 (68) | 295 (68) | 221 (68) | 74 (68) | 1.00 | REF | |
Yes | 181 (32) | 141 (33) | 106 (32) | 35 (32) | 0.99 (0.62, 1.56) | 0.95 | |
Exposed to SHS at work a | |||||||
No | 67 (12) | 51 (37) | 42 (40) | 9 (26) | 0.21 | REF | |
Yes | 113 (20) | 87 (63) | 62 (60) | 25 (74) | 1.88 (0.82, 4.63) | 0.15 | |
Exhaled Breath CO (ppm) | 15 (9, 22) | 15 (9, 22) | 15 (9, 22) | 17 (9, 23) | 0.27 | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 0.79 |
Smokescreen baseline analysis | |||||||
Light | 356 (70) | 274 (70) | 207 (70) | 67 (69) | 0.98 | REF | |
Moderate | 89 (17) | 67 (17) | 50 (17) | 17 (18) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.02) | 0.96 | |
Heavy | 65 (13) | 53 (13) | 40 (13) | 13 (13) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 0.20 | |
Other Substance Use | |||||||
Alcohol consumption | |||||||
No alcohol misuse | 91 (23) | 63 (21) | 41 (19) | 22 (28) | 0.10 | REF | |
Alcohol misuse | 302 (77) | 236 (79) | 180 (81) | 56 (72) | 0.59 (0.32, 1.06) | 0.07 | |
Marijuana use | |||||||
No | 179 (60) | 138 (59) | 100 (58) | 38 (63) | 0.55 | REF | |
Yes | 120 (41) | 95 (41) | 73 (42) | 22 (37) | 0.79 (0.43, 1.44) | 0.45 | |
Clinical Characteristics | |||||||
Current Viral Load | |||||||
<200 copies/mL | 22 (25) | 18 (25) | 15 (25) | 3 (25) | 1.00 | REF | |
>200 copies/mL | 65 (75) | 54 (75) | 45 (75) | 9 (75) | 1.0 (0.25, 4.94) | 1.00 | |
Current CD4+ T cell count | |||||||
<200 cells/µL | 85 (25) | 69 (25) | 52 (25) | 17 (28) | 0.88 | REF | |
200–500 cells/µL | 159 (48) | 138 (50) | 103 (49) | 29 (48) | 0.86 (0.44, 1.73) | 0.67 | |
>500 cells/µL | 88 (27) | 70 (25) | 55 (26) | 15 (24) | 0.83 (0.37, 1.84) | 0.53 | |
High Blood Pressure Medication | |||||||
No | 499 (89) | 391 (89) | 292 (89) | 99 (90) | 0.91 | REF | |
Yes | 62 (11) | 47 (11) | 36 (11) | 11 (10) | 0.90 (0.42, 1.78) | 0.77 | |
Current TB | |||||||
No | 539 (96) | 419 (96) | 313 (96) | 106 (96) | 1.00 | REF | |
Yes | 21 (4) | 18 (4) | 14 (4) | 4 (4) | 0.84 (0.23, 2.41) | 0.77 | |
Current Cough | |||||||
No | 338 (60) | 270 (62) | 200 (61) | 70 (64) | 0.70 | REF | |
Yes | 223 (40) | 168 (38) | 128 (39) | 40 (36) | 0.89 (0.56, 1.39) | 0.62 |
a Among those who work (n = 180).
In the univariate analysis, NMR was moderately associated with sociodemographic variables; however, the direction of association was inconsistent. Individuals with more than a twelfth-grade education were 76% more likely to be fast metabolizers than those who had less than a twelfth-grade education (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.0; p = 0.04), but those who had a monthly family income of more than ZAR 1000 were less likely to be fast metabolizers than those who had a monthly family income of less than ZAR 1000 (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.53, 1.27; p = 0.38). Compared to those below the age of 40, individuals above the age of 40 were less likely to be fast metabolizers (OR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.28; p = 0.39).
A high NMR had limited association with more intense smoking characteristics. Individuals with a quit attempt in the past year were less likely to be fast metabolizers, compared to those who never attempted to quit (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.07, p = 0.09), and those exposed to secondhand smoke at work were 88% more likely to be fast metabolizers than those not exposed to secondhand smoke at work (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 0.82, 4.63, p = 0.15). We found no association between cigarettes per day and high NMR (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.70, p = 0.66). Alcohol misuse was negatively associated with NMR; individuals who reported alcohol misuse were less likely to be fast metabolizers than those without alcohol misuse (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06, p = 0.07). Only weak to no associations were seen between NMR and marijuana use or HIV clinical characteristics.
Separate linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between NMR as a log-transformed continuous variable and each characteristic of interest; results were consistent with associations found with our binary outcome of fast versus normal metabolizers. No differences were seen in the association between NMR and variables of interest when the analysis was stratified by sex.
4. Discussion
This cross-sectional study described the variability of NMR and its association with sociodemographic, tobacco use, and clinical characteristics in a population of PWH who smoke in South Africa. NMR was dichotomized into fast and regular metabolizers using a cut-off of the fourth quartile; few associations were seen between NMR and variables of interest. NMR was minimally associated with tobacco use characteristics, and the NMR had weak to no association with sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. Our study sample, which was reflective of the burden of smoking among PWH in South Africa, was a racially and ethnically homogenous population of Black South Africans, primarily of low socioeconomic status; this likely contributed to the observed relative lack of variability in NMR values.
We reported little variability in values of NMR in this population, and we found a minimal association between fast NMR and more intense smoking characteristics, which was inconsistent with evidence from smokers from both the general population and among PWH [11,18,27]. We found no evidence that those with a fast NMR tended to smoke more cigarettes per day; our observed association was inconsistent with existing literature, which showed a positive association between high NMR and a higher number of cigarettes per day [11,18,27]. Although we also found a negative association between NMR and quit attempts in the last year, there was limited to no association between NMR and nicotine dependence, as measured by the Heaviness of Smoking Index. We also found that those reporting alcohol misuse were less likely to be fast metabolizers of nicotine. This was inconsistent with recent studies in the general population [27,28], which reported positive associations between alcohol consumption and NMR. Similarly, in a trial of men receiving treatment for alcohol use disorder, a 50% reduction in NMR was reported among those who successfully abstained from alcohol, compared to the baseline, despite little change in tobacco use, suggesting that chronic alcohol exposure induces CYP2A6 activity, which is responsible for nicotine metabolism [29].
Overall, the values of NMR found in our study sample were lower than what was reported in other populations of PWH in high-resource settings; however, the existing evidence came largely from more diverse Western settings, with a large proportion of participants of Caucasian descent. Mean values of NMR in literature among PWH range from 0.35 to 0.47 [11,25,27,30], whereas the mean in this study was 0.32. Given our sample was entirely Black South African, and given African Americans on average have a lower NMR than other racial/ethnic groups, the homogeneity of our population, with a genetic makeup closer to those with typically lower NMRs, aligned our findings with these other studies. The variability in the NMR observed in this study may be too minimal to allow the use of NMR as a tool for clinical decision-making at the individual level in this population. Existing studies among PWH reported greater variability in NMR, with values ranging from 0.054 to 1.42 [11], while our minimum and maximum values were 0.29 to 0.57, respectively. In addition, participants of African descent in other studies also reported a higher average number of cigarettes per day than our study population, with an average number of cigarettes per day of 16.6 among individuals of African descent [18], compared to 11.1 in this present study. Existing studies largely found no association between NMR and sociodemographic characteristics other than sex, race/ethnicity, and age; associations in our study between NMR and sex, age, and other sociodemographic characteristics were weak and inconsistent in direction. A handful of studies in the general population demonstrated a relationship between high NMR and older age [24,26,31]. However, studies in HIV populations did not report these associations [11,30], which was consistent with our findings. We also found no association with sex, which was inconsistent with existing evidence showing that women have a higher NMR than men [18,27].
Our findings are not without limitations. NMR was measured in urine in this study, which tends to correlate imperfectly with NMR measured in plasma [32,33]. NMR values obtained in our study may not accurately represent the sample or the population but is likely to be a reasonable approximation of plasma NMR. Recent evidence also suggests that some antiretroviral medications may impact nicotine metabolism. Efavirenz was found to raise NMR, given it is metabolized by the same pathway as nicotine [13]; this implies that people with HIV who smoke and are on efavirenz may have more intense smoking behaviors and more difficulty quitting smoking compared to those on other ARTs who are given an elevated NMR. However, our sample was drawn from a population with limited access to antiretroviral drugs at the time of recruitment, given policies at the time limiting the initiation of ART to individuals with a CD4+ count under a defined level, compared to current universal test and treat policies. Additionally, other predictors of smoking behavior, such as extreme poverty, may have influenced smoking behavior in our sample to a degree that would have reduced the impact of NMR on smoking behavior [26]. Given that included subjects were recruited for participation in a clinical trial for smoking cessation, our sample may have included a disproportionate number of individuals with a slower metabolism. Participants in the primary trial must have been willing to set a quit date, and those with faster metabolisms may have been less willing to attempt to quit and therefore less willing to participate in the primary cessation study; this may have limited the generalizability of our findings. While a more racially/ethnically diverse sample may result in the greater variability of NMR, our study sample is reflective of the burden of HIV in this setting. The results of this study are most generalizable to ethnically African populations with HIV in the region; however, evaluations of those without HIV in this population would be informative.
5. Conclusions
We found minimal variability in NMR values among a population of Black South Africans with HIV, compared to typical ranges found in other more diverse settings. While there was some association between NMR and smoking characteristics in this population, the clinical utility may be the strongest for understanding the willingness to make a quit attempt among individuals with higher NMR. Overall, our findings highlighted the potential limitations of using NMR to inform approaches for treatment of nicotine dependence among PWH in this population. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the relationship between NMR and a successful quit attempt to more fully understand the clinical implications of NMR in this setting.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the participants for generously volunteering their time and sharing their experiences with us. We also thank Tracy Snyman for supporting the analysis of the urine samples.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, R.N., N.M., J.E.G. and J.L.E.; formal analysis, C.K.; funding acquisition, N.M., J.E.G. and J.L.E.; methodology, C.K., Z.W., N.M., J.E.G. and J.L.E.; project administration, L.L., K.M., N.M. and J.E.G.; supervision, L.L., K.M., N.M., J.E.G. and J.L.E.; writing—original draft, C.K. and Z.W.; writing—review and editing, L.L., K.M., D.A., E.V., N.G., R.N., N.M., J.E.G. and J.L.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Colorado State University (protocol ID: 19-9219H; date of approval: 30 August 2019), Johns Hopkins University (protocol ID: NA_00048461/CR00024365; date of approval: 22 January 2019), and the University of the Witwatersrand (protocol ID: M110741; date of approval: 19 October 2012).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health, grant number R01DA030276 and the College Research Council of the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at Colorado State University.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.UNAIDS AIDSinfo. 2019. [(accessed on 1 July 2022)]. Available online: http://aidsinfo.unaids.org/
- 2.Burkhalter J.E., Springer C., Chhabra R., Ostroff J., Rapkin B. Tobacco use and readiness to quit smoking in low-income HIV-infected persons. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2005;7:511–522. doi: 10.1080/14622200500186064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crothers K., Griffith T., McGinnis K., Rodriguez-Barradas M., Leaf D., Weissman S., Gibert C., Butt A., Justice A. The impact of cigarette smoking on mortality, quality of life, and comorbid illness among HIV-positive veterans. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2005;20:1142–1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feldman J.G., Minkoff H., Schneider M., Gange S., Cohen M., Watts D., Gandhi M., Mocharnuk R., Anastos K. Association of cigarette smoking with HIV prognosis among women in the HAART era: A report from the women’s interagency HIV study. Am. J. Public Health. 2006;96:1060–1065. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Webb M.S., Vanable P., Carey M., Blair D. Cigarette smoking among HIV+ men and women: Examining health, substance use, and psychosocial correlates across the smoking spectrum. J. Behav. Med. 2007;30:371–383. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9112-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Triplette M., Crothers KAttia E.F. Non-infectious Pulmonary Diseases and HIV. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016;13:140–148. doi: 10.1007/s11904-016-0313-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith C.J., Ryom L., Weber R., Morlat P., Pradier C., Reiss P., Kowalska J.D., de Wit S., Law M., el Sadr W., et al. Trends in underlying causes of death in people with HIV from 1999 to 2011 (D:A:D): A multicohort collaboration. Lancet. 2014;384:241–248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60604-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Farahani M., Mulinder H., Farahani A., Marlink R. Prevalence and distribution of non-AIDS causes of death among HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. STD AIDS. 2017;28:636–650. doi: 10.1177/0956462416632428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.May M.T., Gompels M., Delpech V., Porter K., Orkin C., Kegg S., Hay P., Johnson M., Palfreeman A., Gilson R., et al. Impact on life expectancy of HIV-1 positive individuals of CD4+ cell count and viral load response to antiretroviral therapy. Aids. 2014;28:1193–1202. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elf J.L., Variava E., Chon S., Lebina L., Motlhaoleng K., Gupte N., Niaura R., Abrams D., Golub J., Martinson N. Prevalence and Correlates of Smoking Among People Living with HIV in South Africa. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2018;20:1124–1131. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schnoll R.A., Thompson M., Serrano K., Leone F., Metzger D., Frank I., Gross R., Mounzer K., Tyndale R., Weisbrot J., et al. Brief Report: Rate of Nicotine Metabolism and Tobacco Use Among Persons With HIV: Implications for Treatment and Research. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2019;80:e36–e40. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Baurley J.W., Edlund C., Pardamean C., Conti D., Krasnow R., Javitz H., Hops H., Swan G., Benowitz N., Bergen A. Genome-Wide Association of the Laboratory-Based Nicotine Metabolite Ratio in Three Ancestries. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016;18:1837–1844. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maimbo M., Kiyotani K., Mushiroda T., Masimirembwa C., Nakamura Y. CYP2B6 genotype is a strong predictor of systemic exposure to efavirenz in HIV-infected Zimbabweans. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012;68:267–271. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1118-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cho D.-Y., Shen J., Lemler S., Skaar T., Li L., Blievernicht J., Zanger U., Kim K.-B., Shin J.-G., Flockhart D., et al. Rifampin enhances cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6-mediated efavirenz 8-hydroxylation in healthy volunteers. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2016;31:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Metzger I.F., Dave N., Kreutz Y., Lu J., Galinsky R., Desta Z. CYP2B6 Genotype-Dependent Inhibition of CYP1A2 and Induction of CYP2A6 by the Antiretroviral Drug Efavirenz in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2019;12:657–666. doi: 10.1111/cts.12671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haas D.W., Kwara A., Richardson D., Baker P., Papageorgiou I., Acosta E., Morse G., Court M. Secondary metabolism pathway polymorphisms and plasma efavirenz concentrations in HIV-infected adults with CYP2B6 slow metabolizer genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014;69:2175–2182. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanner J.-A., Tyndale R.F. Variation in CYP2A6 Activity and Personalized Medicine. J. Pers. Med. 2017;7:18. doi: 10.3390/jpm7040018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schnoll R.A., George T., Hawk L., Cinciripini P., Wileyto P., Tyndale R. The relationship between the nicotine metabolite ratio and three self-report measures of nicotine dependence across sex and race. Psychopharmacology. 2014;231:2515–2523. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3421-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.A Smoking Cessation Trial in HIV-Infected Patients in South Africa (JHU) [(accessed on 12 December 2022)];2014 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
- 20.Massyn N., Day C., Peer N., Padarath A., Barron P., English R. District Health Barometer 2013/14. Health Systems Trust; Durban, South Africa: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heatherton T.F., Kozlowski L., Frecker R., Rickert W., Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: Using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br. J. Addict. 1989;84:791–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ewing J.A. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–1907. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Feng J.W.L., Blount B. Nicotine Metabolites and Analogs in Urine by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. CDC Division of Laboratory Sciences Laboratory Protocol. [(accessed on 31 December 2022)];2018 Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2015-2016/labmethods/UCOT_I_UCOTS_I_Urinary_Nicotine_Metabolites_and_Analogs_MET.pdf.
- 24.Kaufmann A., Hitsman B., Goelz P., Veluz-Wilkins A., Blazekovic S., Powers L., Leone F., Gariti P., Tyndale R., Schnoll R. Rate of nicotine metabolism and smoking cessation outcomes in a community-based sample of treatment-seeking smokers. Addict. Behav. 2015;51:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ashare R.L., Thompson M., Leone F., Metzger D., Gross R., Mounzer K., Tyndale R., Lerman C., Mahoney M., Cinciripini P., et al. Differences in the rate of nicotine metabolism among smokers with and without HIV. Aids. 2019;33:1083–1088. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schnoll R.A., Patterson F., Wileyto E., Tyndale R., Benowitz N., Lerman C. Nicotine metabolic rate predicts successful smoking cessation with transdermal nicotine: A validation study. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009;92:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chenoweth M.J., Novalen M., Hawk L., Jr., Schnoll R., George T., Cinciripini P., Lerman C., Tyndale R. Known and novel sources of variability in the nicotine metabolite ratio in a large sample of treatment-seeking smokers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014;23:1773–1782. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roberts W., Marotta P., Verplaetse T., Peltier M., Burke C., Ramchandani V., McKee S. A prospective study of the association between rate of nicotine metabolism and alcohol use in tobacco users in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108210. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gubner N.R., Kozar-Konieczna A., Szoltysek-Boldys I., Slodczyk-Mankowska E., Goniewicz J., Sobczak A., Jacob P., Benowitz N., Goniewicz M. Cessation of alcohol consumption decreases rate of nicotine metabolism in male alcohol-dependent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bien-Gund C.H., Bilker W., Schnoll R., Tyndale R., Ho J., Bremner R., Ashare R., Gross R. Brief Report: Nicotine Metabolism Ratio Increases in HIV-Positive Smokers on Effective Antiretroviral Therapy: A Cohort Study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2022;89:428–432. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shahab L., Mortimer E., Bauld L., McGowan J., McNeill A., Tyndale R. Characterising the nicotine metabolite ratio and its association with treatment choice: A cross sectional analysis of Stop Smoking Services in England. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17994-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tanner J.-A., Novalen M., Jatlow P., Huestis M., Murphy S., Kaprio J., Kankaanpää A., Galanti L., Stefan C., George T., et al. Nicotine metabolite ratio (3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine) in plasma and urine by different analytical methods and laboratories: Implications for clinical implementation. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2015;24:1239–1246. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Giratallah H.K., Chenoweth M., Addo N., Ahluwalia J., Cox L., Lerman C., George T., Benowitz N., Tyndale R. Nicotine metabolite ratio: Comparison of the three urinary versions to the plasma version and nicotine clearance in three clinical studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;223:108708. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.