Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2023 Mar 24;4(2):102192. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102192

Chimerism and phenotypic analysis of intraepithelial and lamina propria T cells isolated from human ileal biopsies after intestinal transplantation

Katherine D Long 1,2,∗∗, Jianing Fu 1,3,
PMCID: PMC10050767  PMID: 36964907

Summary

Understanding immune cell dynamics after intestinal transplantation has provided new insights into human lymphocyte biology. However, isolating and characterizing such cells can be challenging. Here, we provide a protocol to isolate intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes from human ileal biopsies. We describe techniques for flow cytometric analysis and determination of multilineage chimerism and T lymphocyte phenotypes. This protocol can be modified to isolate and analyze lymphocytes from other tissues.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Fu et al. (2019)1 and Fu et al. (2021).2

Subject areas: Cell Isolation, Flow Cytometry/Mass Cytometry, Clinical Protocol, Immunology

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Isolating intraepithelial and lamina propria immune cells from human ileal biopsies

  • Determination of multilineage chimerism using HLA allele-specific antibodies

  • Phenotypic analysis of T cell subsets using multicolor flow cytometry

  • Adaptable to isolate and analyze immune cells from other human tissues


Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.


Understanding immune cell dynamics after intestinal transplantation has provided new insights into human lymphocyte biology. However, isolating and characterizing such cells can be challenging. Here, we provide a protocol to isolate intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes from human ileal biopsies. We describe techniques for flow cytometric analysis and determination of multilineage chimerism and T lymphocyte phenotypes. This protocol can be modified to isolate and analyze lymphocytes from other tissues.

Before you begin

The protocol below describes the specific steps for isolating intraepithelial and lamina propria immune cells from fresh ileal biopsies from intestinal transplant patients. This protocol can also be adapted to isolate and analyze immune cells from other human tissues (e.g., liver, lung, lymph nodes, spleen). The determination of multilineage chimerism using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele-specific antibodies, along with the phenotypic analysis of T cell subsets using multicolor flow cytometry, can be applied to other types of human tissues after transplantation.

Institutional permissions

The studies involved in this protocol were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (IRB nos. AAAJ5056, AAAF2395, and AAAS7927). All subjects or legal guardians provided their written, informed consent and assent when appropriate. Requests to transfer human biospecimens outside of the organization must be submitted for Columbia’s IRB review and approval.

Prepare and prewarm media and buffers

Inline graphicTiming: 0.5 h

  • 1.

    Prepare the necessary reagents before starting the experiment. Recipes and storage condition details are in materials and equipment.

  • 2.

    Prewarm aliquots of dithiothreitol (DTT), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and lamina propria lymphocyte (LPL) buffers in a 37°C water bath.

Note: Each patient sample, which contains 1–4 pieces of human ileal biopsies from one patient at one timepoint, will require 20 mL DTT buffer, 20 mL EDTA buffer, and 25 mL LPL buffer.

Prepare individual incubation environments

Inline graphicTiming: 0.25 h

  • 3.

    Prepare an individual water bath for each patient sample. Add 100–150 mL Millipore water to a 1 L beaker and set the beaker on a hot plate stirrer.

  • 4.

    Place a thermometer inside the beaker and adjust the hot plate settings until the water temperature reaches 37°C.

  • 5.

    Label a sterile 125 mL ventilated flask with identifying information for each sample.

  • 6.

    Add a sterile (autoclaved) stir bar to each flask.

Prepare antibody panel

Inline graphicTiming: 0.25–0.5 h

  • 7.

    Prepare the flow cytometry antibody panel (Table 1).

Note: Primary antibodies should be prepared as a master mix immediately before staining samples. This preparation can occur during the LPL buffer incubation. The primary antibody master mix should exclude Fc block, any secondary antibody (Streptavidin BUV737 is the secondary antibody in the Pt25 multilineage panel), and DAPI. Details on staining panel and dilution factors are in materials and equipment.

Note: Antibody panels should be tailored to include donor and/or recipient-specific HLA antibodies and pan-HLA class I (HLA-ABC) antibody for each patient to determine chimerism after transplantation. The 18-color antibody panel is adjusted depending on the patient and which immune cell populations are prioritized. For example, in the Pt25 multilineage panel, we often alternate between recent thymic emigrant (RTE) marker CD313 and NK cell marker CD56.4

Table 1.

Primary surface antibody staining panel: Pt25 multilineage panel

Marker Fluorophore Clone
CD45 PE-CF594 HI30
CD19 BUV496 SJ25C1
CD3 PerCP-Cy5.5 SP34-2
CD4 redFluor 710 OKT4
CD8 APC-Cy7 SK1
γδTCR PE-Cy7 IMMU510
CD45RA BV510 HI100
CD197 (CCR7) PE G043H7
CD56 BV605 HCD56
CD69 BV650 FN50
CD103 BV711 Ber-ACT8
CD49a BUV395 SR84
CD28 Pacific Blue CD28.2
CD314 (NKG2D) APC 1D11
HLA-A2, A28 Biotin N/A
HLA-B12 FITC REA138
HLA-ABC BV786 G46-2.6

For Pt25, HLA-A2, 28 Biotin and HLA-B12 FITC are used to distinguish recipient and donor cells, respectively. For HLA-A2, A28 Biotin, the secondary antibody Streptavidin BUV737 completes the staining. For other patients, where only a donor or recipient HLA antibody is available and can clearly distinguish donor and recipient cells, FITC or Biotin-Streptavidin-BUV737 channels in this panel may be used to stain for other markers, such as using CD14 FITC to capture monocyte chimerism. Adjustments, such as alternating between CD31 BV605 and CD56 BV605 in the 18-color antibody staining panel for samples, allows for the study of different cell populations.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD3 (clone SK7) APC-Cy7 BD Biosciences Cat#561800; RRID: AB_396890
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD3 (clone SP34-2) PerCP-Cy5.5 BD Biosciences Cat#552852; RRID: AB_394493
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD4 (clone OKT4) AF700 Tonbo Cat#80-0048; RRID: AB_2621976
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD8 (clone SK1) APC-Cy7 BD Biosciences Cat#561945; RRID: AB_396892
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD14 (clone M5E2) APC-Cy7 BioLegend Cat#301820; RRID: AB_493695
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD14 (clone M5E2) FITC BioLegend Cat#982502; RRID: AB_2616906
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD19 (clone SJ25C1) BUV496 BD Biosciences Cat#612938; RRID: AB_2870221
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD21 (clone Bu32) PerCP-Cy5.5 BioLegend Cat#354908; RRID: AB_2561544
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD24 (clone ML5) BUV395 BD Biosciences Cat#563818; RRID: AB_2632389
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD27 (clone O323) BV711 BioLegend Cat#302834; RRID: AB_2563809
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD28 (clone CD28.2) Pacific Blue BioLegend Cat#302928; RRID: AB_10641279
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD31 (clone WM-59) BV605 BD Biosciences Cat#562855; RRID: AB_2737841
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD33 (clone P67.6) APC-Cy7 BioLegend Cat#366614; RRID: AB_2566416
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD38 (clone HIT2) PE-Cy7 BioLegend Cat#303516; RRID: AB_2072782
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD45 (clone HI30) PE-CF594 BD Biosciences Cat#562279; RRID: AB_11154577
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD45 (clone HI30) V500 BD Biosciences Cat#560777; RRID: AB_1937324
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD45RA (clone HI100) Brilliant Violet 510 BioLegend Cat#304142; RRID: AB_2561947
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD45RB (clone MEM-55) PE BioLegend Cat#310204; RRID: AB_314807
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD49a (clone SR84) BUV395 BD Biosciences Cat#742363; RRID: AB_2740721
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD56 (clone HCD56) Brilliant Violet 605 BioLegend Cat#318334; RRID: AB_2561912
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD69 (clone FN50) Brilliant Violet 650 BioLegend Cat#310934; RRID: AB_256315
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD103 (clone Ber-ACT8) Brilliant Violet 711 BioLegend Cat#350222; RRID: AB_2629651
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD138 (clone MI15) redFluor 710 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#46138842; RRID: AB_2815146
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD197 (CCR7) (clone G043H7) PE BioLegend Cat#353204; RRID: AB_10913813
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD314 (NKG2D) (clone 1D11) APC BioLegend Cat#320808; RRID: AB_492962
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human CD326 (clone 9C4) APC-Cy7 BioLegend Cat#324246; RRID: AB_2783194
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A2/A28 (clone N/A) Biotin One Lambda Cat#BIH0037; RRID: N/A
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A2, A28 (clone REA142) FITC Miltenyi Biotec Cat#130-099-601; RRID: AB_2652040
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A2 (clone BB7.2) FITC BioLegend Cat#343304; RRID: AB_1659245
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A3 (clone GAP.A3) APC Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#17-5754-42; RRID: AB_2573220
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A9 (clone N/A) Biotin One Lambda Cat#BIH0964; RRID: N/A
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A9 FITC (clone N/A) One Lambda Cat#FH0964; RRID: N/A
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-A29 (clone N/A) Biotin One Lambda Cat#BIH0155; RRID: N/A
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-ABC (clone G56-2.6) APC BD Biosciences Cat#555555; RRID: AB_398603
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-ABC (clone G46-2.6) BV786 BD Biosciences Cat#740982; RRID: AB_2740606
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-B8 (clone N/A) FITC One Lambda Cat#FH0536A; RRID: N/A
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-B12 (clone REA138) FITC Miltenyi Biotec Cat#130-099-860; RRID: AB_2652098
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human HLA-Bw6 (clone REA143) APC Miltenyi Biotec Cat#130-099-845; RRID: AB_2652026
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human IgA (clone IS11-8310) APC Miltenyi Biotec Cat#130113472; RRID: AB_1036150
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human IgD (clone IA6-2) BD Biosciences Cat#563313; RRID: AB_2738134
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human IgG (clone G18-145) V450 BD Biosciences Cat#561299; RRID: AB_10611575
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human IgM (clone G20-127) PE-CF594 BD Biosciences Cat#562539; RRID:
AB_2737641
Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor 594 Conjugate Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#S32356; RRID: N/A
Streptavidin BUV737 BD Biosciences Cat#564293; RRID: AB_2869560
Mouse monoclonal anti-Human γδTCR (clone IMMU510) PE-Cy7 Beckman Coulter Cat#B10247; RRID: N/A

Biological samples

Patient intestinal biopsies N/A N/A
Buffycoats New York Blood Center N/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

AIM V Medium Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#12055-091
Bovine Serum Albumin, Heat Shock Treated Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#BP1600-100
Collagenase D (2.5 G) Roche Applied Science Cat#11088882001
4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#D9542-10MG
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) Millipore Sigma Cat#D2438-5X10ML
DL-Dithiothreitol solution, ∼1 M in H₂O Sigma-Aldrich Cat#43816
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#15575020
Hanks’ Buffered Saline Solution (HBSS) (1×), without phenol red, calcium or magnesium Lonza Cat#10-547F
HBSS (10×), no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#14185052
HEPES, 1 M Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#15630080
Human Serum AB GeminiBio Cat#100512
2-Mercaptoethanol, 14.3 M Sigma-Aldrich Cat#M3148
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (1×) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#SH3025602
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#15140122
RPMI 1640, 1× without L-glutamine Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#MT15040CV
Sodium azide Sigma-Aldrich Cat#S2002
Sodium hydroxide, 1.0 N Standardized Solution Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#AA35629K2
Trypan Blue Solution, 0.4% Fisher Scientific Cat#15250061

Software and algorithms

FlowJo BD Biosciences www.flowjo.com (v9.9.6 and v10.8.0)

Other

BD LSR II Flow Cytometer BD Biosciences
Cell Strainers, 40 μm Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#08-771-1
125 mL Erlenmeyer Flask (Flat Base) TriForest Labware Cat#FPC0125S
Magnetic Stir Bars Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#14-513-60SIX
Sterile Disposable Filter Units with PES Membranes Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#09-741-02

Materials and equipment

Reconstituted Collagenase D

Reagent Final concentration Amount
Hanks’ Buffered Saline Solution (HBSS) (1×), without phenol red, calcium or magnesium N/A 49 mL
Collagenase D (2.5 G) 50 mg/mL 2.5 g
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: Reconstitute Collagenase D in HBSS (1X) and filter through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter before use. Although the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) recommends the reconstitution of only the amount of lyophilizate needed for immediate use, our practice has shown that reconstituted Collagenase D aliquotted in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (0.5 mL/tube and 1 mL/tube) can be stored at –20°C for at least 2 months. Thaw new aliquots each time for LPL buffer preparation. Avoid repeated freezing and thawing.

Prepared 2-Mercaptoethanol (2-ME)

Reagent Final concentration Amount
HBSS (1×), without phenol red, calcium or magnesium N/A 28.45 mL
2-ME, 14.3 M 25 mM 0.05 mL
Total N/A 28.5 mL

Note: Reconstitute the entire vial of 2-Mercaptoethanol in HBSS (1X) and aliquot into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (1 mL/tube). Prepared 2-ME can be stored at –20°C for at least 2 months. Thaw fresh aliquots each time for MLR media preparation.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: 2-ME is combustible as a liquid or vapor, with a very low odor threshold (0.12–0.64 ppm), and can be toxic if ingested and fatal if inhaled or absorbed through the skin. 2-ME preparation should be performed in the chemical fume hood.

DTT Buffer

Reagent Final concentration Amount
HBSS (10×), no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red 5 mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) 100 U/mL 0.5 mL
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 5 mM 0.05 mL
DL-Dithiothreitol solution, ∼1 M in H2O 0.2 mM 0.1 mL
Sterile dH2O N/A 44.35 mL
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: Autoclave Millipore water to obtain sterile dH2O. Filter buffer through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter. DTT buffer can be prepared in advance in a 500 mL volume and stored at 4°C for at least 2 months. Aliquot the necessary amount of buffer and prewarm at 37°C before use.

EDTA Buffer

Reagent Final concentration Amount
HBSS 10× (no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red) 5 mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) 100 U/mL 0.5 mL
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 5 mM 0.05 mL
Sterile dH2O N/A 44.45 mL
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: Autoclave Millipore water to obtain sterile dH2O. Filter buffer through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter. EDTA buffer can be prepared in advance at a 500 mL volume and stored at 4°C for at least 2 months. Aliquot the necessary amount of buffer and prewarm at 37°C before use.

LPL Buffer

Reagent Final concentration Amount
RPMI 1640, 1× without L-glutamine N/A 48.5 mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) 100 U/mL 0.5 mL
Reconstituted Collagenase D (50 mg/mL) 1 mg/mL 1 mL
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: Collagenase D reconstitution details are above. Filter buffer through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter. LPL buffer base (consisting of Penicillin-Streptomycin and RMPI 1640, 1× without L-glutamine) can be prepared in advance at a 490 mL volume and stored at 4°C for at least 2 months. Add a freshly thawed aliquot of reconstituted Collagenase D to an aliquot of the necessary amount of LPL buffer base needed each time and prewarm at 37°C before use.

Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction (MLR) Media

Reagent Final concentration Amount
AIM-V Medium N/A 470 mL
Human Serum AB 5% 25 mL
HEPES, 1 M 10 mM 5 mL
Prepared 2-ME (25 mM) 50 μM 1 mL
Total N/A 500 mL

Note: Heat inactivate the human serum before use. 2-ME needs to be prepared as detailed above. Filter media through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter before use. MLR media can be prepared in advance and stored at 4°C for at least 2 months. Aliquot the necessary amount of buffer and prewarm at 37°C before use.

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Buffer

Reagent Final concentration Amount
HBSS 10× (no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red) 100 mL
Millipore H2O N/A 900 mL
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), 1.0N Standardized Solution 210 μN 0.210 mL
Sodium azide (NaN3) 1 mg/mL 1 g
Bovine Serum Albumin, Heat Shock Treated 1 mg/mL 1 g
Total N/A 1 L

Note: Add HBSS 10× and Millipore H2O first before adding the remaining reagents. NaOH is used to adjust the pH to 7.0–7.2. NaN3 is added as a preservative. FACS buffer can be prepared in advance and stored at 4°C for at least 4 months.

Trypan Blue Live/Dead Viability Dye

Reagent Final concentration Amount
Trypan Blue Solution, 0.4% 0.2% 10 mL
Phosphate Buffered Solution (1×), no calcium, no magnesium N/A 10 mL
Total N/A 20 mL

Note: Trypan Blue viability dye can be prepared in advance and stored at 21°C for at least 2 months.

DAPI Stock Solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
DAPI powder 5 mg/mL 10 mg
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) N/A 2 mL
Total N/A 2 mL

Note: Add 2 mL DMSO to the DAPI vial to create a 14.3 mM (5 mg/mL) DAPI stock solution, making sure the DAPI is thoroughly dissolved. DAPI stock solution can be prepared in advance and stored in the dark at −20°C for at least 6 months.

DAPI Staining Solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
DAPI Stock Solution (5 mg/mL) 2 μg/mL 2 μL
FACS Buffer N/A 5 mL
Total N/A 5 mL

Note: FACS Buffer should be prepared as detailed above. Add 2 μL of the DAPI stock solution (details above) to 5 mL FACS Buffer. Vortex and then filter through a 0.22 μm sterile vacuum filter before use. DAPI staining solution can be prepared in advance and stored in the dark at 4°C for at least 6 months.

Surface antibody staining panel: Pt25 multilineage panel (enough for up to 1.5 × 106 live cells, which includes up to 0.5 × 106 intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and up to 0.5 × 106 LPLs from a one-time ileoscope sample that includes 1–4 biopsy pieces from the same patient, and 0.5 × 106 healthy control peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

Reagent Final concentration Amount
CD45 (PE-CF594) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:64 titer
CD19 (BUV496) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
CD3 (PerCP-Cy5.5) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
CD4 (AF700) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:8 titer
CD8 (APC-Cy7) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
γδTCR (PE-Cy7) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
CD45RA (BV510) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:64 titer
CD197/CCR7 Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
CD56 (BV605) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
CD69 (BV650) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
CD103 (BV711) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
CD49a (BUV395) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
CD28 (Pacific Blue) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
CD314/NKG2D (APC) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
HLA-A2, A28 (Biotin) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:4 titer
HLA-B12 (FITC) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:2 titer
HLA-ABC (BV786) Additional 27.5× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:16 titer
Streptavidin (BUV737) Additional 11× dilution of designated titer 15 μL from diluted stock at 1:32 titer
DAPI staining solution Approximately at 0.1 μg/mL 7.5 μL from the 2 μg/mL stock
Total N/A 255 μL for 17 colors without secondary antibody and DAPI

Note: Freshly prepare the antibody panel each time. For HLA-A2, A28 Biotin, the secondary antibody Streptavidin BUV737 is used. For each antibody with a new manufacturer lot number, an antibody titration should be performed to determine an appropriate titer for that specific lot. Then, the stock antibody can be diluted with FACS buffer to create aliquots at the designated titer for staining and sorting purposes.

Step-by-step method details

IELs and LPLs were separated either from intestinal graft biopsy specimens or surgically obtained intestinal graft specimens at the time of stoma closure/revision, according to a protocol adapted from previous reports5 and used in our previous studies.1,2,6

Isolating intraepithelial lymphocytes

Inline graphicTiming: 1 h

These steps isolate IELs from patient samples. The epithelial integrity of ileal biopsy is disrupted by DTT, a reducing agent, and EDTA, a calcium chelator that targets calcium-dependent junctions and promotes the detachment of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). The DTT and EDTA incubation steps liberate IELs and IECs into the medium without altering the basement membrane.7 Supernatant collected from both steps are combined to enrich IELs.

  • 1.

    Collect research ileoscope samples from consented patients during clinical endoscopy. Each patient sample consists of 1–4 ileal biopsy pieces, ideally around 4–6 mm3 per piece, from one patient at one timepoint (Figure 1A) (troubleshooting 1).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Ileal biopsies should be processed the same day they are collected, and no later than the next day. If a specimen will not be immediately processed, it should be stored in a sterile vial with saline solution or MLR media at 4°C.

  • 2.

    For each patient sample, add 20 mL of prewarmed DTT buffer to a sterile 125 mL flask.

  • 3.

    Transfer the ileal biopsy piece(s) into the 125 mL flask, ensuring each piece is floating in the DTT buffer (Figure 1B).

  • 4.

    Place the flask into the prewarmed water bath beaker set on the hot plate stirrer.

Note: The water level in the beaker should be above the buffer level in the flask but below the flask cap (Figure 1C). If there is a large volume of buffer being used, such as when processing larger pieces of tissue, this is not necessary. The flask should sit still in the beaker. If it is floating, consider adding a weight on top of the flask.

Note: A 37°C incubator with agitation could be used for each incubation, but the beaker with hot plate stirrer may be optimal: because a stir bar is better at ensuring the small biopsy pieces move around in the buffer for efficient cell isolation. Additionally, each hotplate stirrer functions independently. When processing different tissue samples from multiple patients at once, it is useful to be able to adjust each incubation setting on its own.

  • 5.

    Incubate biopsy pieces in DTT buffer with constant stirring, 125–150 rpm, for 20 min at 37°C.

Note: If processing larger pieces of tissue, the stirring rate can be increased to 150–250 rpm.

  • 6.

    Allow pieces to settle to the bottom of the flask and filter the DTT cell suspension through a 40 μm strainer into a 50 mL conical tube (Figure 1D).

  • 7.

    Centrifuge the DTT cell suspension at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Pour off the supernatant to retain the cell pellet.

  • 8.

    Add 5–10 mL MLR media to the cell pellet in the conical tube and keep it on ice.

  • 9.

    Add 20 mL prewarmed EDTA buffer to the flask (Figure 1E).

  • 10.

    Incubate biopsy pieces in EDTA buffer with constant stirring, 150–200 rpm, for 30 min at 37°C.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Between incubation steps, biopsy pieces can adhere to the flask wall while the cell suspension from the previous incubation is poured through the cell strainer. If the tissue pieces stay in this position during subsequent incubations, they will dry up and cell viability and yield will be negatively impacted. Thus, it is important to ensure each biopsy piece is re-submerged in the new buffer before proceeding with the next incubation.

  • 11.

    Allow pieces to settle to bottom of the flask and filter the EDTA cell suspension through 40 μm strainer into the 50 mL conical tube that already has the DTT cell suspension (Figure 1F).

  • 12.

    Centrifuge the DTT and EDTA cell suspension at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C.

  • 13.

    Pour off the supernatant to retain the cell pellet.

  • 14.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in 1 mL MLR media, transfer to a 5 mL flow cytometry tube with a cap, and keep on ice or in a refrigerator at 4°C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Isolating intraepithelial lymphocytes

(A) Collect research samples, which consist of 1–4 ileal biopsy pieces from consented patient during clinical endoscopy.

(B) Place the sample into the DTT buffer in the labeled 125 mL ventilated flask a with sterile stir bar.

(C) Place the flask into the prewarmed water bath beaker at 37°C, ensuring the water level in the beaker is above the buffer level in the flask.

(D) Filter DTT cell suspension through 40 μm single-cell strainer into 50 mL conical tube. Centrifuge the cell suspension, pouring off the supernatant after and resuspending the pellet in 5 mL MLR media.

(E) Add 20 mL prewarmed EDTA buffer to the flask. Ensure the sample is floating in the buffer.

(F) Filter EDTA cell suspension through 40 μm single-cell strainer into the 50 mL conical tube from the previous DTT step with MLR media.

Isolating lamina propria lymphocytes

Inline graphicTiming: 1.25 h

These steps subsequently isolate LPLs from the patient samples. The lamina propria regions of ileal biopsies are disrupted by the collagenase D treatment.7

  • 15.

    Add 25 mL of prewarmed LPL buffer to the 125 mL flask, ensuring the biopsies are submerged in the LPL buffer (Figure 2A).

  • 16.

    Place the flask back into the beaker and incubate with constant stirring, 150–200 rpm, at 37°C for 1–1.5 h.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: During longer incubation periods, it is especially important to periodically monitor the water bath temperature to ensure it does not exceed 37°C, as incubating the tissue at higher temperatures may reduce cell viability and yield. Adjust the hotplate settings if the temperature begins to climb.

  • 17.

    Pour the LPL cell suspension through a 40 μm strainer into a new 50 mL conical tube (Figure 2B).

  • 18.

    Wash the sides of the 125 mL flask with 25 mL MLR media and pour through a 40 μm strainer into the 50 mL conical tube that already has the LPL cell suspension (Figure 2C).

  • 19.

    Centrifuge at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C.

  • 20.

    Pour off supernatant to retain cell pellet.

  • 21.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in 1 mL MLR media, transfer to a new 5 mL flow cytometry tube with a cap, and keep on ice or in a refrigerator at 4°C.

Note: Collagenase D function is calcium-dependent, and its activity is inhibited by low temperature and reagents such as EDTA, DTT, and 2-ME.

Inline graphicPause point: The experiment can be paused at this point, ideally for no longer than 4 h, before proceeding to flow cytometry staining. However, proceeding with the antibody staining steps sooner is suggested to ensure better viability of cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Isolating lamina propria lymphocytes

(A) Add 25 mL prewarmed LPL buffer to the flask, ensuring the sample is in the buffer.

(B) Filter LPL cell suspension through 40 μm single-cell strainer into new 50 mL conical tube.

(C) Wash the sides of the 125 mL flask with 25 mL MLR media and filter contents through 40 μm single-cell strainer into the same 50 mL conical tube with the LPL cell suspension.

Antibody staining for flow cytometric analysis

Inline graphicTiming: 1.25 h

These steps stain the IELs and LPLs isolated from patient samples with various antibodies in an 18-color panel (troubleshooting 2).

Prior to antibody staining and acquisition of patient samples, fluorescence compensation of the antibody panel must be performed on the flow cytometer that will be used for cell acquisition (in this case, the BD LSR II). This is critical because different fluorophores can have partially overlapping emission spectra, and it is necessary to correct for this fluorescence spillover.

To perform fluorescence compensation, stain single color controls (0.5 × 106 PBMCs isolated from a healthy human donor per control) for each fluorophore (general ratio for each Ab is 10 μL diluted Ab at pre-determined titer per 1 × 106 cells, where the cells are already resuspended at a ratio of 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer), in addition to an unstained control (troubleshooting 3). When acquiring each single-color control on the flow cytometer, adjust voltage settings such that the target fluorophore displays the highest mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in comparison to the spillover seen in the other fluorophores to minimize ambiguity on the origin of fluorescence and compensate the full panel.

  • 22.

    Add 1 mL FACS buffer to each flow cytometry tube.

  • 23.

    Centrifuge samples at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C.

  • 24.

    Pour off the supernatant and, keeping the tube inverted, quickly touch tube rim with a clean Kim Wipe to absorb away any last drops of supernatant.

  • 25.

    Resuspend cells at 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer.

Note: For samples around the ideal size, it can be assumed that there are 0.5 × 106 cells in each IEL and LPL flow cytometry tube. This cell count for antibody staining is an overestimation of the targeted CD45+ cell population based on our previous flow cytometry data from patient biopsies, where around 2,000–100,000 CD45+ cells were obtained from up to 4 ileal biopsy pieces around the ideal size described earlier. Given that the target cell number from these biopsies is low, we omit the regular counting step to save more cells for chimerism and phenotypic analysis.

Note: When larger tissue pieces are processed and stained (for example, from a stoma revision/closure, or graft explant), perform cell counting and adjust the amount of each antibody needed for staining.

  • 26.

    Stain each cell sample with Fc block, pipetting up and down to mix.

Note: The general ratio for Fc block staining is 5 μL Fc block per 1 × 106 cells, where the cells are already resuspended at a ratio of 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer.

  • 27.

    Incubate at room temperature for 5 min.

  • 28.

    Stain each sample with the prepared primary antibody master mix.

Note: The general ratio for antibody staining is 10 μL diluted of each Ab at a pre-determined titer per 1 × 106 cells, where the cells are already resuspended at a ratio of 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer. In the situation of a 18-color panel staining (including DAPI) where the Ab cocktail volume (5 μL × 17 = 85 μL) is greater than the volume of FACS buffer (50 μL) used to reconstitute 0.5 × 106 cells at 10 × 106/mL, at least a 2-fold lower dilution should be used of each Ab (e.g.: 1:4) rather than the titer selected at the time of Ab titration of a single color panel (e.g., 1:8).

  • 29.

    Incubate for 30 min at 4°C in the dark, ideally in a fridge at 4°C. However, placing the cell samples in a bucket of ice with a lid should also work.

  • 30.

    Add 1 mL FACS buffer to each flow cytometry tube.

  • 31.

    Centrifuge samples at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C.

  • 32.

    Pour off the supernatant and, keeping the tube inverted, quickly touch tube rim with a clean Kim Wipe to absorb away any last drops of supernatant.

  • 33.

    Reconstitute cells at 10 × 106/mL in FACS buffer (add 50 μL FACS buffer to 0.5 × 106 cells per tube).

  • 34.

    Stain each sample with the secondary antibody (Streptavidin BUV737 is the secondary antibody in the Pt25 multilineage panel) and incubate for 15 min at 4°C in the dark.

Note: The general ratio for antibody staining is 10 μL diluted Ab at a pre-determined titer per 1 × 106 cells, where the cells are already resuspended at a ratio of 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer.

  • 35.

    Add 1 mL FACS buffer to each flow cytometry tube.

  • 36.

    Centrifuge samples at 465 × g for 5 min at 4°C.

  • 37.

    Pour off the supernatant. Keeping the tube inverted, quickly touch tube rim with a clean Kim Wipe to absorb away any last drops of supernatant.

  • 38.

    Reconstitute cells at 10 × 106/mL in FACS buffer (add 50 μL FACS buffer to 0.5 × 106 cells per tube).

  • 39.

    Stain each sample with DAPI, pipetting up and down to mix.

Note: The general ratio for DAPI staining is 5 μL of DAPI staining solution (2μg/mL stock) per 1 × 106 cells, where the cells are already resuspended at a ratio of 10 × 106 cells/mL in FACS buffer.

  • 40.

    Keep cell samples at 4°C in the dark before proceeding to next steps.

Inline graphicPause point: The experiment can be paused for up to 12 h at this point before proceeding. Samples should be kept at 4°C in the dark during this period.

Data collection

Inline graphicTiming: 1 h

These steps acquire flow cytometry data from the prepared patient samples for downstream analysis.

  • 41.

    Collect data on the flow cytometer (LSR II, BD Biosciences). Prior to acquiring patient samples, fluorescence compensation must be performed to adjust settings on the flow cytometer. Analyze data with FlowJo v9.9.6 and v10.8.0 software (FlowJo, LLC).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Prior to acquiring patient samples, HLA quality control (QC) should be performed on the flow cytometer using pre-transplant donor and recipient PBMCs or lymphoid tissue cells with known HLA typing. This is to determine appropriate commercially available HLA antibodies that work best for chimerism tracking on post-transplant specimens.

  • 42.

    PBMCs isolated from a healthy human donor can serve as a staining control. They are stained with the same antibodies and then acquired on the flow cytometer alongside patient sample(s) (troubleshooting 4).

Note: The control helps determine chimerism gating as well as resting stage phenotypic markers on circulating T cell subsets during flow cytometry analysis.

  • 43.

    When analyzing the flow cytometry data, gate on the control sample first, and then apply those gates to the patient samples. Lineage markers and chimerism gates can then be adjusted as needed, based on the contour plot distribution (troubleshooting 5).

Expected outcomes

This protocol outlines the isolation of live immune cells, especially IELs and LPLs, from human ileal biopsies for analysis of multilineage chimerism and phenotypes of T cells. With this protocol, donor and/or recipient-derived immune cells can be defined using HLA-allele-specific antibodies versus pan-HLA-ABC. This includes T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+), NK cells (CD56+) and myeloid cells (CD14+). Different T cell subsets such as CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells, γδTCR+ T cells, and their functional phenotypes, naïve and memory T cells (CD45RA vs CCR7 to categorize naïve, central memory, effector memory and terminally-differentiated effect memory T cells), tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM: CD69+ CD103+/− CD49a+/), effector T cells (CD28+ NKG2D+/−), and recent thymic emigrants (RTEs: CD3+ CD45RA+ CD31+), can be determined as previously described,1,2,6,8,9 and as illustrated in an gating example of ileal IEL of Pt25 POD241 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gating strategy for multilineage chimerism, as well as donor and recipient T cell phenotypes, in post-transplant ileal biopsies, using ITx Pt25 POD241 IEL as an example

(A) Representative contour plots depicting gating strategy of HLA-ABC+ CD45+ cells, CD3+ T cells, CD3+ γδTCR+ T cells, CD3+ γδTCR CD4+ T cells, CD3+ γδTCR CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and CD3-CD56+ NK cells.

(B) Percentages of donor (“D”) and recipient (“R”) multilineage chimerism in Pt25 POD241 IELs. Pt25’s donor is HLA-B12+. Pt25, the recipient, is HLA-A68+, which has serological cross-reactivity with HLA-A28.

(C) Gating strategy for donor (“D”) and recipient (“R”) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in Pt25 POD241 IELs. CD45RA vs. CCR7 to categorize naïve T cells (CD45RA+ CCR7+), central memory T cells (TCMs: CD45RA CCR7+), effector memory T cells (TEMs: CD45RA CCR7), and terminally-differentiated effector memory T cells (TEMRAs: CD45RA+ CCR7-), tissue-resident memory T cells (TRMs: CD69+ CD103+/− CD49a+/), effector T cells (CD28+ NKG2D+/−).

The wide range of detectable cell types and phenotypes allows for the detailed study of donor- and recipient-derived immune cell dynamics within the intestinal graft mucosa after intestinal transplantation in conjunction with clinical observations.

This protocol can be modified to study the immune cell composition of other tissue types (such as bone marrow, liver, lung, lymph nodes, peripheral blood, and spleen) as well as the dynamics of mixed chimerism and T cell phenotypes in other types of transplantation in humans over time. Although beyond the scope of this protocol, it is worth mentioning that when disassociating other tissue such as spleen, lymph nodes, and lung, IEL and LPL isolation steps are not performed, as it is irrelevant for these tissues. However, enzymes such as Collagenase D and DNAse are used in incubation steps under the same condition as described in this protocol’s LPL isolation to aid in tissue disaggregation and prevent cell clumping. Depending on the tissue type and tissue size being processed, subsequent gentleMACS disassociation, sterile filtration, and Ficoll or Percoll gradients are also needed to isolate the immune cells for downstream experimental steps and analysis.

Limitations

Clinical biopsy scopes are not always consistently performed in depth to capture enough intestinal mucosa layers for lymphocyte isolation. This can affect the cellularity obtained from IEL and LPL isolation, and subsequently affect the targeted immune cell yield (DAPI- HLA-ABC+ CD45+) for flow cytometric analysis.

While chimerism gating in flow cytometric analysis ideally stays consistent across all samples for one patient, sample-specific adjustments may be needed (troubleshooting 5). This is likely due to the enzyme digestion effect of Collagenase D on MHC-I expression,10 which can impact the binding and staining intensity of HLA antibodies in our settings.

While the antibody panel detailed in this protocol can capture many populations and be tailored to different patient HLA backgrounds, it is not sufficient to analyze all lymphocyte populations at once. To analyze other immune cell populations in depth, certain markers will need to be swapped out for others, or different flow panels would have to be applied to additional clinical specimens (as described in troubleshooting 3). Alternatively, expanded flow cytometry panels that include more than 30 markers will need to be developed to obtain more information from limited clinical specimens.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

A much larger tissue piece is obtained from the patient following a relevant clinical procedure, such as a stoma revision/closure or graft explant procedure (step 1).

Potential solution

Before isolating immune cells from larger intestinal tissue pieces, the intestinal mucosa must first be separated from other layers that can interfere with lymphocyte isolation, such as the intestinal submucosa, muscular layers, and serosa. In a sterile Petri dish, use sterile forceps and scissors to trim the mucosa away from the other tissue layers. Use sterile PBS (1×) as needed to wash away any debris during this process. Then, cut the mucosa into small pieces, approximately 6–10 mm3 per piece, and transfer to a sterile 125 mL ventilated flask to begin incubation steps.

During IEL and LPL isolation steps, scale up the amount of DTT, EDTA, LPL buffer used to 50 mL each for 10–20 mucosa pieces, and extend the incubation time to 1 h for each IEL isolation buffer. The incubation period for LPL isolation can be extended further to 1.5–2 h as well. Both DNAse (10 μg/mL) and Amphotericin B (1 μg/mL) should be added to DTT, EDTA, and LPL buffers when processing larger amounts of intestinal tissue.

Problem 2

The current 18-color antibody panel has a limited number of phenotypic markers for non-T cell populations (antibody staining for flow cytometric analysis).

Potential solution

  • If non-T cell populations, such as B cells and plasma cells, are the priority of study, rebuild the current 18 color panel by replacing T cell phenotypic markers to B cell and plasma cell markers as needed (Table 2).

  • Alternatively, a different flow cytometer can be used, such as the Cytek Aurora. The Cytek Aurora can resolve over 40 colors in combination, allowing for the previously separate T-cell and B-cell panels to be joined into a new panel with more colors. Panel design and template setup will be critical to ensure optimal multicolor detection on precious clinical samples.

Table 2.

Primary surface antibody staining panel: Pt25 B-cell panel

Marker Fluorophore Clone
IgM PE-CF594 G20-127
CD19 BUV496 SJ25C1
CD21 PerCP-Cy5.5 Bu32
CD138 redFluor 710 MI15
CD3, CD14, CD33, and CD326 APC-Cy7 SK7, M5E2, P67.6, and 9C4
CD38 PE-Cy7 HIT2
IgG V450 G18-145
CD45RB PE MEM-55
IgD BV605 IA6-2
CD69 BV650 FN50
CD27 BV711 O323
CD24 BUV395 ML5
CD45 V500 HI30
IgA APC IS11-8310
HLA-A2, A28 Biotin N/A
HLA-B12 FITC REA138
HLA-ABC BV786 G46-2.6
DAPI DAPI N/A

For this patient, HLA-A2, 28 Biotin and HLA-B12 FITC antibodies are used to distinguish recipient and donor cells, respectively. Because this is a tailored B-cell panel, CD3, CD14, CD33, and CD326 antibodies used in this panel are conjugated to the same fluorophore to easily gate them out during flow cytometric analysis.

For HLA-A2, A28 Biotin, the secondary antibody Streptavidin BUV737 completes the staining.

Problem 3

The panel that needs to undergo fluorescence compensation contains markers that detect antigens that single-color control cells rarely or do not express (e.g., CD69 and CD103 for healthy human PBMCs), compromising single color staining and panel setup for clear fluorescence detection (antibody staining for flow cytometric analysis).

Potential solution

  • Stain the single-color control cells with antibodies that are conjugated to the same fluorochromes but bind to more common and highly expressed antigens (e.g., CD45 and CD3) instead for fluorescence compensation.

  • Use commercially available antibody-capture beads as compensation controls.

Problem 4

Low cell yield affects the feasibility of flow cytometry analysis (step 42).

Situation I: If the overall immune cell yield (DAPI HLA-ABC+ CD45+) is low, it might be due to:

  • Clinical scopes failed to capture enough mucosal tissue.

  • Water bath temperature is unstable and rose too high (over 40°C) during longer incubations (0.5 h–1.5 h) and harmed the cells.

  • Some or all the ileal biopsy pieces in the sample adhered to the flask wall instead of being in the buffers during incubation steps and dried up.

Situation II: If certain cell populations have low cell count in either the isolated IEL or LPL components, it might be due to:

  • Naturally low level of certain cell populations distributed in the IEL or LPL

  • Cell yield was affected by immunosuppressive treatment at different stages post-transplant.

Potential solution

Situation I:

  • Carefully inspect each ileal biopsy piece before processing to ensure enough mucosal tissue has been captured.

  • Closely monitor the water bath temperature to make sure it stays at 37°C, especially during longer incubation periods.

  • Closely monitor the ileal biopsy pieces during each incubation step to ensure they are all floating in the buffers.

Situation II:

  • Research the expected yield of the cell populations of interest in both the isolated IEL and LPL components and adjust the sample amount accordingly.

  • Closely follow the patient’s clinical treatment regimen and note any changes that may have affected the cell populations of interest in the ileal graft. Adjust experimental plan and priorities accordingly to achieve the best utilization of precious limited clinical ileal biopsy specimens.

Problem 5

Cell samples exhibit dim or undistinguishable antibody staining on donor and/or recipient-specific HLA markers, resulting in compromised chimerism determination in flow cytometric analysis (step 43).

Potential solution

  • Performing HLA quality control (HLA-QC) using pre-transplant donor and recipient PBMCs or lymphoid tissue cells with known HLA types is strongly recommended to determine which HLA markers will perform best. FMO (fluorescence minus one) controls for each HLA antibody are critical to be included in HLA-QC steps. Lineage markers including each targeted cell population are also necessary in HLA-QC steps to determine multilineage chimerism.

  • In some cases, donor and/or recipient-specific HLA antibodies may show lower staining intensities in LPL compared to IEL samples collected at the same time point from the same patient. This is likely due to the digestive effect of collagenase D on HLA expression as discussed above. An additional cell washing step with MLR media is recommended after the LPL buffer incubation. Increasing the amount of HLA antibody when staining isolated LPL samples may also help avoid dim staining. When performing flow cytometric analysis of patient chimerism, sample-specific gating could be applied based on the contour plot distribution, in reference to both healthy control PBMCs, and the IELs from the same time point.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to the lead contact, Jianing Fu (jf2977@cumc.columbia.edu).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents. Requests to transfer human biospecimens outside of the organization must be submitted for Columbia’s IRB review and approval.

Data and code availability

The flow cytometric data supporting the current study have not been deposited in a public repository because they have not been published yet, but they are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the V. Segal and S. Segal Columbia Center for Translational Immunology (CCTI) Biobank Core, Program Project Grant (PPG) P01 AI106697 funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) Discovery Award W81XWH-20-1-0159, funded by the Department of Defense (DoD), an R21 grant AI166069 supported by the NIH/NIAID and Nelson Faculty Development Awards from the Nelson Family Transplantation Innovation Award Program at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Research reported here was performed in the CCTI Flow Cytometry Core, supported in part by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards S10RR027050 and S10OD020056.

We thank Dr. Megan Sykes from the CCTI at Columbia University for her review of this protocol and guidance of the research, and we thank Tyla Young for her assistance in taking photographs for our processing steps. We also thank present and past members of Dr. Sykes’s and J.F.’s laboratories at the CCTI for their assistance in human tissue experiments, the CCTI Flow Cytometry Core for their excellent services, and the healthcare providers at Columbia University for their dedicated care of the intestinal transplant patients.

We gratefully acknowledge the generosity of the donors, intestinal transplant patients, and their families for making this research possible.

The graphical abstract was created with BioRender.com.

Author contributions

K.L. and J.F. wrote the paper. J.F. reviewed and edited.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Katherine D. Long, Email: kl2986@cumc.columbia.edu.

Jianing Fu, Email: jf2977@cumc.columbia.edu.

References

  • 1.Fu J., Zuber J., Martinez M., Shonts B., Obradovic A., Wang H., Lau S.P., Xia A., Waffarn E.E., Frangaj K., et al. Human intestinal allografts contain functional hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that are maintained by a circulating pool. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:227–239.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fu J., Zuber J., Shonts B., Obradovic A., Wang Z., Frangaj K., Meng W., Rosenfeld A.M., Waffarn E.E., Liou P., et al. Lymphohematopoietic graft-versus-host responses promote mixed chimerism in patients receiving intestinal transplantation. J. Clin. Invest. 2021;131 doi: 10.1172/JCI141698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimmig S., Przybylski G.K., Schmidt C.A., Laurisch K., Möwes B., Radbruch A., Thiel A. Two subsets of naive T helper cells with distinct T cell receptor excision circle content in human adult peripheral blood. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:789–794. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Poznanski S.M., Ashkar A.A. Shining light on the significance of NK cell CD56 brightness. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018;15:1071–1073. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0163-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Binda E., Erhart D., Schenk M., Zufferey C., Renzulli P., Mueller C. Quantitative isolation of mouse and human intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes by elutriation centrifugation. J. Immunol. Methods. 2009;344:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zuber J., Shonts B., Lau S.P., Obradovic A., Fu J., Yang S., Lambert M., Coley S., Weiner J., Thome J., et al. Bidirectional intragraft alloreactivity drives the repopulation of human intestinal allografts and correlates with clinical outcome. Sci. Immunol. 2016;1 doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aah3732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee J.S., Oka K., Obara M., Nishimukai M., Yoo Y.C., Yamada K., Tsukahara T., Nakayama K., Hara H., Ishizuka S. Improved isolation methods for mucosal leukocytes from small and large intestines in rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009;73:1732–1740. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zuber J., Rosen S., Shonts B., Sprangers B., Savage T.M., Richman S., Yang S., Lau S.P., DeWolf S., Farber D., et al. Macrochimerism in intestinal transplantation: association with lower rejection rates and multivisceral transplants, without GVHD. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:2691–2703. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumar B.V., Ma W., Miron M., Granot T., Guyer R.S., Carpenter D.J., Senda T., Sun X., Ho S.H., Lerner H., et al. Human tissue-resident memory T cells are defined by Core transcriptional and functional signatures in lymphoid and mucosal sites. Cell Rep. 2017;20:2921–2934. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Autengruber A., Gereke M., Hansen G., Hennig C., Bruder D. Impact of enzymatic tissue disintegration on the level of surface molecule expression and immune cell function. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012;2:112–120. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.2.2012.2.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The flow cytometric data supporting the current study have not been deposited in a public repository because they have not been published yet, but they are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES