Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 16;15(6):1443. doi: 10.3390/nu15061443

Table 1.

Epidemiological studies assessing the association between dried fruit intake and cancer risk published since 2019.

Study Type Participants Cancer Type Outcome (95% CI) Reference
Systematic review n = 437,298 from 16 studies Pancreatic, prostate, colorectal polyps Dose-response trend from prospective studies Mossine et al., 2020 [51]
Stomach, pancreatic, colorectal, nasopharyngeal, bladder Total dried fruit, raisins, or dates reduced incidence from case–control studies
Cohort UK Women’s Cohort Study (n = 35,372 women aged 35–69 in England, Wales, and Scotland) Breast HR 1.04 (0.98,1.13) Dunneram et al., 2019 [60]
Endometrial HR 0.60 (0.37, 0.97)
Ovarian HR 1.06 (0.89, 1.26)
Prospective cohort National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study (n = 485,403 men and women aged 50–71 at baseline in the United States) Liver HR (Q5 vs. Q1) 0.73 (0.60, 0.89) Zhao et al., 2022 [61]
Mendelian randomization UK Biobank (n ~500,000 men and women aged 49–69 in the United Kingdom) Oral cavity/pharyngeal IVW OR 0.17 (0.04, 0.69) Jin et al., 2022 [62]
Lung IVW OR 0.33 (0.17, 0.64)
Squamous cell lung IVW OR 0.23 (0.09, 0.60)
Breast IVW OR 0.47 (0.32, 0.68)
Pancreatic IVW OR 0.03 (0.001, 0.68)
Cervical IVW OR 0.99 (0.9897, 0.9998)
Lung adenocarcinoma, endometrial, thyroid, prostate, bladder, brain IVW OR not significant

Abbreviations: HR, Hazard ratio; IVW, Inverse variance weighted; OR, Odds ratio.