Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;9(2):00641-2022. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00641-2022

TABLE 3.

Sensitivity analyses

Studies/patients n Risk ratio (95% CI), I2 (%) Haemodynamically stable patients only
risk ratio (95% CI), I2 (%)
RVD
Number of criteria for RVD definition:
  ≥1 echo criterion
≥2 echo criteria
≥3 echo criteria
16/5488 7/2633 1/89 1.50 (1.28–1.87), 24 1.76 (1.46–2.12), 0 0.44 (0.30–0.65)# 1.52 (1.15–2.00), 73
Studies including >100 patients 16/7502 1.59 (1.36–1.87), 36 -
Studies published beyond 2010 12/6318 1.47 (1.24–1.74), 33 -
RV/LV
Different cut-offs:
  ≥1 9/2079 1.57 (0.93–2.65), 35 1.11 (0.91–1.35), 0
  >1 2/990 1.09 (0.91–1.35), 0
  >0.6 1/950 3.47 (1.72–6.98)#
TAPSE
Different cut-offs:
  ≥15 mm 3/828 3.23 (1.45–7.18), 0 2.29 (0.97–5.44), 71
  >16 mm 6/1159 2.19 (0.80–6.03), 66
  >20 mm 1/2108 1.68 (0.78–3.64), 0

CI: confidence interval; RVD: right ventricular dysfunction as comprehensive definition; RV/LV ratio: right ventricle/left ventricle diameter ratio; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. #: the result is obtained for one study only, thus I2 is not calculated.