Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jan 19;239(2):561–572. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06048-7

Table 1. Relative effects of FR increases, IP acid, and SC morphine on social- vs. food-maintained responding.

For social self-administration, demand curves were determined for three door-open times (15, 30, and 60 sec), but effects of IP acid and analgesics were determined only for the 30-sec door open time. For food-maintained responding, the status of food restriction or free feeding is specified, and effects of IP and analgesics were determined only under free-feeding conditions. All data show mean values (95% CL) from 6 rats (3 female, 3 male).

Demand Curves
Reinforcement FR 1 Baseline Essential IP Acid Morphine
Conditions # Reinforcers Value EC50 (%) ED50 (mg/kg)
Social
 15 s Door Open 35.5 (24.6–46.4) 5.1 (4.4–5.8) ND ND
 30 s Door Open 26.3 (21.9–30.7) 5.6 (4.9–6.3) 0.42 (0.36–0.48) 1.06 (0.70–1.63)
 60 s Door Open 20.5 (15.4–25.6) 7.0 (5.3–8.7) ND ND
Food
 Food Restricted 53.2 (49.3–57.0)* 15.2 (9.1–21.4)* ND ND
 Free Fed 53.2 (47.0–59.3)* 10.8 (9.1–12.5)* 2.40* (1.99–2.91) 5.26* (4.05–6.68)
*

Asterisk indicates that values for food reinforcement are significantly higher than all values for social reinforcement as determined by non-overlapping confidence limits.

ND-Not Determined. Individual α values were transformed to “essential value” such that a larger number reflects greater reinforcing effectiveness using the following equation (Hursh 2014): 1/[α×k1.5×100]