Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;10(2):762–775. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14233

Table 2.

Examples of right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling surrogate parameters and cut‐off values for prediction of events

Prediction of event Parameter Cut‐off value
Uncoupling measured by gold‐standard Ees/Ea in patients with PAH 29 TAPSE/PASP <0.31 mm/mmHg
Mortality during follow‐up after significant secondary tricuspid regurgitation diagnosis 50 TAPSE/PASP <0.31 mm/mmHg
Mortality in patients with heart failure 30 TAPSE/PASP <0.36 mm/mmHg
Transplant‐free survival in patients with PH 25 SV/ESV >0.515
Adverse outcomes in patients with precapillary PH 63 RVEF/PASP <0.44%/mmHg
Response to CRT 39 , a

RVGLS/PASP

RVFWLS/PASP

>0.35%/mmHg

>0.41%/mmHg

12 month mortality in outpatients with stable heart failure 40 , a

RVGLS/PASP

RVFWLS/PASP

<0.36%/mmHg

<0.65%/mmHg

Poor prognosis and RV/LV maladaptation 44 TAPSE/PASP <0.38 mm/mmHg

CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; Ea, arterial elastance; Ees, end‐systolic elastance; ESV, end‐systolic volume; LV, left ventricular; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PASP, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; RV, right ventricular; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; RVFWLS, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain; RVGLS, right ventricular global longitudinal strain; SV, stroke volume; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.

a

Authors excluded minus sign for strain.