Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;9(3):56. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9030056

Table 2.

Mean score and SD to statements from the questionnaire. Score: 1 = not at all, 10 = absolutely.

Questions Median Range SD
I felt the annotations were accurate. 8 7–10 0.99
I was consistently getting the same accuracy. 7 5–9 1.31
The annotations were clearly visible. 9 7–10 1.2
The augmented environment was responsive to actions that I initiated. 7 5–10 1.66
My interactions with the augmented environment seemed natural. 8 4–10 1.94
I felt proficient using the voice commands. 7 3–10 2.01
I felt that learning to operate the augmented environment would be easy for me. 8.5 6–10 1.51
I felt distracted by the augmented environment. 2 1–8 1.95
I had trouble concentrating. 2 1–8 2.1
I suffered from fatigue/headache/dizziness during my interaction with the augmented environment. 1 1–8 2.23
The experience hurt my eyes. 1 1–2 0.32
I suffered from nausea/vertigo during my interaction with the augmented environment. 1 1–2 0.32
I suffered from discomfort wearing the HoloLens. 3 1–8 2.15
Personally, I would say the augmented environment is practical. 8 3–10 2
I feel there are many different settings/operations in which the technology can be used. 9.5 5–10 1.6
I believe the RISP will be useful as a teaching tool. 8.5 4–10 2.15
I believe the RISP will be useful as a tool for remote consultations. 9.5 5–10 1.69
I believe the RISP will be a helpful tool during surgery. 8 5–10 1.25