I felt the annotations were accurate. |
8 |
7–10 |
0.99 |
I was consistently getting the same accuracy. |
7 |
5–9 |
1.31 |
The annotations were clearly visible. |
9 |
7–10 |
1.2 |
The augmented environment was responsive to actions that I initiated. |
7 |
5–10 |
1.66 |
My interactions with the augmented environment seemed natural. |
8 |
4–10 |
1.94 |
I felt proficient using the voice commands. |
7 |
3–10 |
2.01 |
I felt that learning to operate the augmented environment would be easy for me. |
8.5 |
6–10 |
1.51 |
I felt distracted by the augmented environment. |
2 |
1–8 |
1.95 |
I had trouble concentrating. |
2 |
1–8 |
2.1 |
I suffered from fatigue/headache/dizziness during my interaction with the augmented environment. |
1 |
1–8 |
2.23 |
The experience hurt my eyes. |
1 |
1–2 |
0.32 |
I suffered from nausea/vertigo during my interaction with the augmented environment. |
1 |
1–2 |
0.32 |
I suffered from discomfort wearing the HoloLens. |
3 |
1–8 |
2.15 |
Personally, I would say the augmented environment is practical. |
8 |
3–10 |
2 |
I feel there are many different settings/operations in which the technology can be used. |
9.5 |
5–10 |
1.6 |
I believe the RISP will be useful as a teaching tool. |
8.5 |
4–10 |
2.15 |
I believe the RISP will be useful as a tool for remote consultations. |
9.5 |
5–10 |
1.69 |
I believe the RISP will be a helpful tool during surgery. |
8 |
5–10 |
1.25 |