Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;13(3):600. doi: 10.3390/life13030600

Table 1.

Prognostic importance of NLR in testicular cancer patients.

Author
(Year)
Reference Patients (n) Study Design Cut-Off Value Main Findings
Yuksel
(2016)
[35] 36 Cross-sectional - NLR was significantly elevated in TC patients compared with the control group
Jankovich
(2017)
[32] 103 Retrospective
cohort
4.0 NLR < 4 was a predictor of non-metastatic disease
NLR > 4 was associated with stage > T1
Bolat
(2017)
[36] 53 Retrospective
cohort
3.55 for PFS
3.0 for CSS
Preoperative NLR was not a reliable predictor of PFS and CSS
Gokcen
(2018)
[33] 39 Cross-sectional - NLR was significantly elevated in TC patients compared with the control group
Fankhauser (2018) [40] 146 Retrospective
cohort
4.5 NLR > 4.5 was associated with poor OS in metastatic GCT patients undergoing first-line CHT
Tan
(2019)
[37] 160 Retrospective
cohort
3.0 NLR > 3 was a significant predictor of poor CSS, lymph node involvement, and metastatic disease
Herraiz-Raya (2019) [38] 164 Retrospective
cohort
4.0 NLR > 4 was associated with advanced stage of disease and poor OS
Cursano
(2020)
[42] 146 Retrospective
cohort
4.5 NLR > 4.5 was significantly correlated with poor OS in metastatic GCT patients
Ariman
(2021)
[34] 152 Cross-sectional - NLR was significantly elevated in TC patients compared with the control group
Patients with intermediate and poor IGCCCG prognosis had significantly elevated NLR compared with patients with good IGCCCG prognosis
Bumbasirevic (2022) [39] 88 Prospective
cohort
2.685 NLR > 2.685 was associated with metastatic disease
NLR was significantly increased in Stage II and III patients compared with Stage I patients
NLR was associated with 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a representative byproduct of oxidative DNA damage

NLR, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio; TC, testicular cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; CHT, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; IGCCCG, International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group.