TABLE 3.
Results of modeling and summary of chemical analyses of drinking water source water samples
DWTP # | De Facto Reuse at Mean Streamflow % | Proximity Index (PI) | Skewness Index (SK) | Number of Organic Chemicals Qualitatively Detected (n = 192) | Number of Organic Chemicals Quantitatively Detected (n = 192) | Sum Quantitative Detections ng/L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
DWTP 1 | 12.8 | 20 | 0.67 | 31 | 16 | 135.3 |
DWTP 2 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 0.57 | 32 | 18 | 1,075.2 |
DWTP 3 | 2.3 | 169 | 1.0 | 55 | 31 | 820.2 |
DWTP 4 | 7.8 | 40 | 0.26 | 71 | 35 | 1,425.5 |
DWTP 5 | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 27.5 |
DWTP 10 | 0.4 | 43 | 0.02 | 28 | 18 | 460.9 |
DWTP 11 | 0.8 | 16 | 0.41 | 15 | 6 | 1.5 |
DWTP 12 | — | — | — | 18 | 11 | 69.9 |
DWTP 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 9 | 3.3 |
DWTP 14 | 0.03 | 19 | 1.00 | 13 | 8 | 2.7 |
DWTP 15 | 0.3 | 4.9 | 0.69 | 14 | 6 | 1.5 |
DWTP 16 | 2.7 | 30 | 0.42 | 15 | 13 | 350.1 |
DWTP 17 | 1.3 | 39 | 1.00 | 26 | 13 | 293.4 |
DWTP 18 | 2.6 | 46 | 0.24 | 26 | 22 | 265.6 |
DWTP 19 | 1.0 | 15 | 0.50 | 24 | 10 | 27.6 |
DWTP 20 | 1.5 | 15 | 0.31 | 22 | 8 | 20.0 |
DWTP 21 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 0.86 | 36 | 20 | 877.6 |
DWTP 22 | 0.9 | 156 | 1.00 | 37 | 26 | 1,762.2 |
DWTP 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 11 | 138.3 |
DWTP 24 | — | — | — | 13 | 11 | 541.7 |
DWTP 25 | 4.3 | 64 | 1.00 | 19 | 11 | 17.7 |
DWTP 26 | 2.8 | 39 | 0.84 | 44 | 20 | 451.9 |
DWTP 27 | 6.4 | 35 | 0.44 | 41 | 24 | 1,699.7 |
DWTP 28 | 1.4 | 39 | 1.00 | 24 | 15 | 232.4 |
DWTP 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 31.1 |
Concentration data source: Glassmeyer et al. 2017.
DWTP—drinking water treatment plant
Dashes indicate groundwater locations therefore excluded from calculation.