Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Mar 19:2023.03.16.532975. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.03.16.532975

Extended Data Fig. 8: Expansion microscopy shows that integrin β5 and AP2 are not spatially correlated at the nanopillar-membrane interface, and the integrin β5 is not spatially correlated with clathrin and EPS15 at nanopillars.

Extended Data Fig. 8:

a, Expansion microscopy is used to increase the spatial resolution of optical imaging for the nanopillar-membrane interface (see the method section and Ref. 32 for detailed descriptions). Both ITGβ5 and AP2-α are immunolabeled. Top row: x-y images of the Z projection (Average) and zoom-in images of the area indicated by white boxes. Bottom: x-z images showing the distribution of immunolabeled ITGβ5 and AP2-α along nanopillars at y = Y1 and y = Y2 in the zoom-in images. Even when ITGβ5 and AP2-α accumulate on the same nanopillar in the x-y image, they are not correlated in the z-dimension. b, Both ITGβ5-GFP and immunolabeled clathrin heavy chain (CHC) accumulate at vitronectin-coated nanopillars, but their intensities are not correlated, i.e. nanopillars with high intensities of ITGβ5-GFP are usually not the nanopillars with high intensities of anti-CHC. c, ITGβ5-GFP accumulates at vitronectin-coated nanopillars, but the co-transfected EPS15-RFP does not show strong accumulation or correlation with ITGβ5-GFP at these nanopillars. Scale bars: 10 μm.