Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 20;28(6):2798. doi: 10.3390/molecules28062798

Figure 17.

Figure 17

(A) Ag(I) sorption capacity of CS hydrogels with different imprinting ratios (Nonim = non-imprinted hydrogels; Agim3 to Agim100 = hydrogels with different Ag(I) imprinting mass ratios). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society) (B) Competitive adsorption of Ag(I) and Cu(II) by Ag(I)-imprinted CS hydrogels with different imprinting ratios. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society) (C) The effect of pH on Ag(I) and Cu(II) ions sorption by Ag(I)-imprinted CS gel beads. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [171]. Copyright 2015 Elsevier) (D) Ag(I) sorption isotherms (with Langmuir and Freundlich models fitting profiles) by Ag(I)-imprinted and non-imprinted CS-P(DVB-glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)-ST) particles. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [172]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society) (E) Selectivity of Ag(I) sorption by Ag(I)-imprinted and non-imprinted CS-P(DVB-GMA-ST) particles. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [172]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society) (F) The effect of morphology on Ag(I) sorption by Ag(I)-imprinted CS-P(DVB-GMA-ST) particles. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [172]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society).