Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of different biomarkers for the identification of Hb Bart’s hydrops fetalis.
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
Sonographic markers | Non-invasive technique High predictive performance |
Require specialized sonographers Require specific equipment Operator-dependent |
Biochemical markers | Non-invasive technique Can perform simultaneously with second trimester Down syndrome screening |
Poor predictive performance Require validation Other conditions such as infection can interfere with the result |
Cell-free fetal DNA | Non-invasive technique High predictive performance Can perform simultaneously with Down syndrome screening |
Relatively high costs Complex techniques and laboratory device Requires further validation. Thus, the search for other biomarkers is continuing |
Extracellular vesicles | Non-invasive technique Contain molecular information of dynamic cell and tissue states of disease pathophysiological changes and complications Compatible with multiple etiologies of hydrop fetalis |
Relatively high costs Complex techniques and laboratory device Predictive performance requires further studies |