Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):554. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030554

Table 2.

Cox regression models for the relationship between DM and mortality in MAFLD patients.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Unadjusted HR HR (95% Cl) p-Value HR (95% Cl) p-Value HR (95% Cl) p-Value
All-cause mortality 1.459
(1.310, 1.623)
1.546
(1.381, 1.732)
<0.001 1.564
(1.395, 1.753)
<0.001 1.428
(1.257, 1.623)
<0.001
Cardiovascular mortality 1.482
(1.183, 1.858)
1.546
(1.221, 2.230)
<0.001 1.526
(1.204, 1.935)
<0.001 1.464
(1.122, 1.909)
0.005
Cancer mortality 0.993
(0.791, 1.246)
1.143
(0.903, 1.447)
0.267 1.173
(0.924, 1.489)
0.189 1.026
(0.787, 1.336)
0.851
Non-cardiovascular-related mortality 1.448
(1.282, 1.637)
1.546
(1.358, 1.760)
<0.001 1.575
(1.382, 1.796)
<0.001 1.423
(1.229, 1.647)
<0.001
Non-cancer-related mortality 1.627
(1.439, 1.840)
1.696
(1.489, 1.932)
<0.001 1.709
(1.499, 1.948)
<0.001 1.587
(1.370, 1.838)
<0.001

The results were obtained with Cox proportional hazards analysis and are given as HR with 95% Cl. Model 1: adjusted by age, gender, ethnicity, and poverty income ratio (PIR). Model 2: model 1 + adjusted by hypertension and BMI. Model 3: model 2 + adjusted by vitamin C, ALP, ALB, SCR, and NFS scores.