1. Background
Disease prevention and control is the foundation of public health. In this respect, vaccinations have always been considered a means of proven efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety in the fight against infectious diseases [1]. Thanks to the legacy bequeathed by the first vaccine preparation by Edward Jenner in 1789, smallpox was eradicated, while other diseases (i.e., vaccine-preventable diseases—VPDs) are under control. Since then, millions of lives have been saved and countless cases of diseases and their complications have been prevented [2,3,4,5]. The COVID-19 pandemic further demonstrated how vaccine prophylaxis constitutes the main life-saving tool against VPDs [6].
In order to reach different sectors of the population and achieve better health, Public Health has made numerous efforts to empower citizens to make informed health choices (e.g., voluntary adherence to vaccination) while also making use of digital technologies. From the use of lifestyle monitoring systems to digital education, such as telemedicine, telerehabilitation, and self-medication and digital health interventions (e-health and m-health), information and communication technologies (ICTs) have become an integral component of care practices. In particular, m-health, with the use of digital tools such as websites, mobile applications, and social media [7,8,9], was widely used during the pandemic to facilitate care practices that were strongly conditioned by the health crisis [2].
Nevertheless, the issue of vaccine hesitancy continues to affect more than 15% of the world’s population, and even healthcare workers (HCWs) are expressing doubts about vaccination, with particular reference to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine [10,11,12,13].
Moreover, the anti-vaccine content on the web has compounded the already precarious decision-making process, a dynamic conditioned by the traditional influence of social, cultural, political, and religious determinants on vaccine acceptance. This, due to a marked decrease in vaccination coverage, exposes the population to the risk of the re-emergence of infectious diseases that are today under control [14,15].
In such a broad context, the Special Issue “New Insights in Vaccination and Public Health”, published in the Vaccines journal (MDPI) on 1 October 2021, aimed to gather the best evidence on (i) the adoption of vaccination strategies implemented in order to increase vaccination coverage rates, (ii) the struggle against the issue of vaccine hesitancy, (iii) the implementation of health education interventions aimed at the general public and health care workers, and (iv) health communication and crisis communication interventions in a landscape where information and communication technologies have become part of individual and collective daily life. With this in mind, in its second year of publication, the Special Issue aims to identify some additional proven best practices for the implementation of decisive strategies to achieve the coveted health goals.
2. Manuscripts Published in the Special Issue
Reflecting upon the interest generated by the aforementioned topics of debate, as of 31 October 2022, 18 manuscripts have been accepted for publication in the Special Issue “New Insights in Vaccination and Public Health” following the peer review process. Specifically, 2 systematic reviews, 3 reviews, 11 articles, and 2 communications have been published online.
Several topics have been addressed, and all manuscripts that are published and available online in open-access form are listed in chronological order with respect to the date of publication in Table 1, indicating the following items: authorship (first author), topic, timing of the investigation, methodology, and main results of the study.
Table 1.
Authorship | Research Topic | Time Frame | Methodology | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Heidari S. et al. [16] | Sex and gender differences in the response to COVID-19 vaccination | 2019–2021 | Systematic Review | The literature should further investigate sex and gender differences in the response to vaccination |
Pal S. et al. [17] | Assessing vaccine hesitancy among US HCWs toward COVID-19 vaccination | 2021 | Cross-sectional survey | The hesitancy of some US HCWs to receive booster doses may reflect a general hesitancy to receive other forms of vaccination. |
Lenis-Ballesteros V. et al. [18] | Estimating the seroprevalence of IgG for varicella in pregnant women and newborns | 2016–2017 | Cross-sectional study | High IgG seropositivity for VZV was detected in pregnant women, as was an efficient transfer of antibodies to the newborn. However, the proportion of unprotected pregnant women is significant. |
Scognamiglio F. et al. [19] | New technologies in the field of vaccinology and Healthy Ageing | 2022 | Review | Advances in immunological knowledge and vacciniology highlight novel vaccination strategies adapted to target populations, such as the elderly and people with comorbidities. |
Marzouk M. et al. [20] | Use of Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks and indicators for vaccination implementation | 2022 | Scoping Review | Minimal literature describing monitoring and evaluation frameworks or indicators for use in implementation of vaccination programs. |
Olszowski R. et al. [21] | A Social Network Analysis of Tweets Related to Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination | 2021 | Descriptive analysis | Substantial degree of polarisation, a high intensity of the discussion, and a high degree of involvement of Twitter users relating to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in Poland. |
Craciun M.D. et al. [22] | mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Reactogenicity among HCWs | 2021 | Survey | Knowing the reactogenicity and safety profile of the administered vaccine can improve compliance and acceptance rate among healthcare professionals. |
Yin H. et al. [23] | Investigation of factors influencing the flu and flu vaccination knowledge gap in the COVID-19 pandemic context | 2022 | Survey | There are gaps in knowledge about influenza and flu vaccination. However, internet media and social media are positively associated with knowledge levels. |
Ma C. et al. [24] | Investigation of quantitative indicators in order to identify candidate vaccines to be included in the Expanded Immunization Program | 2021 | Delphi questionnaire | Using the resulting Delphi indicators, experts rank-ordered varicella, meningococcal conjugate AC, Hib, influenza, and EV71 vaccines for consideration of introduction into the EPI. |
Waszkiewicz P. et al. [25] | Investigate the public acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination and actual levels of vaccination | 2019–2020 | Survey | The main factors that help increase vaccination acceptance are based on a self-centered pursuit of safety and freedom from restrictions. |
Shkalim Zemer V. et al. [26] | To explore factors associated with low acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in adults in order to improve public health-targeted interventions in subpopulations with low vaccination rates | 2021–2022 | Observational study | Although COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the adult Israeli population is relatively high, it is significantly lower among minority groups and patients at high risk of severe course and complications of COVID-19, such as those with some comorbidities (asthma, smoking and diabetes mellitus). |
Oduwole E.O. et al. [27] | To provide a broad overview of tools/measures addressing vaccine hesitancy | 2010–2019 | Review | Vaccine hesitancy can also be countered via the application of tools useful for its evaluation in high- and low-income countries. |
Sallam M. et al. [28] | To investigate the possible association between influenza vaccine uptake/acceptance and the embrace of general vaccine conspiracy beliefs | 2022 | Cross-sectional survey | Contrasting vaccine hesitancy is essential to consider the psychological variables that influence the intention to receive flu vaccination. |
Bencherit D. et al. [29] | To estimate knowledge about cervical cancer and HPV viruses, as well as to understand attitudes towards vaccination, both generally and related to HPV | 2021–2022 | Survey | Implementing social education activities and national HPV vaccination programs aimed at young people is strategic to the fight against HPV-induced cancers. |
Aleksandric A. et al. [30] | To investigate vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccine in the Hispanic population by analysing social media data | 2021 | Descriptive analysis | Observation of social media can be a valuable tool for measuring attitudes toward public health interventions. |
Motta M. [31] | To investigate any relationships and possible public health impact of vaccine hesitancy among people who received COVID-19 vaccine boosters in the United States | 2022 | Survey | Determinants such as convenience and confidence play a key role in the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine; therefore, they must be considered in the fight against vaccine hesitancy. |
Mackenzie L-J. et al. [32] | To establish healthcare practitioners’ knowledge of vaccination practice and the preferred definition of shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) between two available definitions | 2022 | Survey | Greater education and awareness of SIRVA and about SIRVA is needed in all healthcare disciplines. |
Pi Z. et al. [33] | To examine whether public-funded influenza and PPSV23 immunization programs among elderly people in Beijing can be improved | 2022 | Cost-effectiveness analyses | Beijing’s current dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination program was cost-effective among the elderly compared with the preceding policies of no vaccination and flu-only immunization programs |
3. Discussion
Several topics were addressed in the Special Issue “New Insights in Vaccination and Public Health” in its first year of publication. Many of these explored the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy [17,20,23,25,26,27,28,30,31,32] and, in particular, the acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine [17,25,26,30,31] and the anti-influenza vaccine [23,28,33]. The role of ICTs was examined in relation to their influence on health choices [21,23,30] and in relation to the use of new technologies in the field of vaccinology [19]. Other topics, such as sex and gender differences in the response to the COVID-19 vaccine [16], serum prevalence surveys for varicella in pregnant women [18], mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactogenicity among HCWs [22], the use of quantitative indicators in order to identify vaccine candidates [24], knowledge and behaviour regarding HPV infection and adherence to vaccine programs offered to adolescents [29], and the adoption of context-specific vaccine policies [32], were also addressed in this Special Issue.
Therefore, as aforementioned, in its second year of publication, this Special Issue aims to gather additional evidence for the implementation of adequate decisive vaccination strategies. Articles, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, brief communications and brief reports, letters or other types of articles dealing with the multidisciplinarity of these times and their impact on public health also with reference to different population cohorts (infants, adolescents, adults, the elderly, and at-risk populations) were welcomed and encouraged for this special sophomore issue. Manuscripts can be submitted to this Special Issue by 31 October 2023.
Author Contributions
A.A., M.D. and P.C. provided equal contribution. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Castiglia P., Arghittu A. New Insight in Vaccination and Public Health: A Commentary from Special Issue Editors. Vaccines. 2022;10:183. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dettori M., Arghittu A., Castiglia P. Knowledge and Behaviours towards Immunisation Programmes: Vaccine Hesitancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:4359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stefanelli P., Bellino S., Fiore S., Fontana S., Amato C., Buttinelli G. Regional Reference Centres of the National Surveillance System for Acute flaccid paralysis. Hospital discharges-based search of acute flaccid paralysis cases 2007–2016 in Italy and comparison with the National Surveillance System for monitoring the risk of polio reintroduction. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1532. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7617-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Restivo V., Costantino C., Fazio T.F., Casuccio N., D’Angelo C., Vitale F., Casuccio A. Factors Associated with HPV Vaccine Refusal among Young Adult Women after Ten Years of Vaccine Implementation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grassi T., Bagordo F., Savio M., Rota M.C., Vitale F., Arghittu A., Sticchi L., Gabutti G., on behalf of the Sero-Epidemiological Study Group Sero-Epidemiological Study of Bordetella pertussis Infection in the Italian General Population. Vaccines. 2022;10:2130. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: COVID Data Tracker—Wastewater Suveillance (2021) [(accessed on 11 April 2022)]; Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#wastewdatatracker-home.
- 7.World Health Organization mHealth Use of Appropriate Digital Technologies for Public Health. [(accessed on 13 February 2023)]. Available online: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71/A71_20-en.pdf.
- 8.Arghittu A., Dettori M., Dempsey E., Deiana G., Angelini C., Bechini A., Bertoni C., Boccalini S., Bonanni P., Cinquetti S., et al. Health Communication in COVID-19 Era: Experiences from the Italian VaccinarSì Network Websites. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:5642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arghittu A., Deiana G., Dettori M., Dempsey E., Masia M.D., Plamieri A., Spano A.L., Azara A., Castiglia P. Web-based analysis on the role of Digital Media in Health Communication: The experience of VaccinarSinSardegna Website. Acta Biomed. 2021;92:e2021456. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dettori M., Arghittu A., Deiana G., Azara A., Masia M.D., Palmieri A., Spano A.L., Serra A., Castiglia P. Influenza Vaccination Strategies in Healthcare Workers: A Cohort Study (2018–2021) in an Italian University Hospital. Vaccines. 2021;9:971. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9090971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arghittu A., Dettori M., Azara A., Gentili D., Serra A., Contu B., Castiglia P. Flu Vaccination Attitudes, Behaviours, and Knowledge among Health Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:3185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costantino C., Caracci F., Brandi M., Bono S.E., Ferro A., Sannasardo C.E., Scarpitta F., Siddu A., Vella C., Ventura G., et al. Determinants of vaccine hesitancy and effectiveness of vaccination counseling interventions among a sample of the general population in Palermo, Italy. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2020;16:2415–2421. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1728157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arghittu A., Dettori M., Masia M., Azara A., Dempsey E., Castiglia P. Social deprivation indexes and anti-influenza vaccination coverage in the elderly in Sardinia, Italy, with a focus on the Sassari municipality. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2019;59:E45–E50. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2018.59.4s2.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rzymski P., Borkowski L., Drąg M., Flisiak R., Jemielity J., Krajewski J., Mastalerz-Migas A., Matyja A., Pyrć K., Simon K., et al. The Strategies to Support the COVID-19 Vaccination with Evidence-Based Communication and Tackling Misinformation. Vaccines. 2021;9:109. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wolf T.G., de Col L., Rad S.A.B., Castiglia P., Arghittu A., Cannavale M. Guglielmo Campus How the COVID-19 Pandemic Affects Risk Awareness in Dentists: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:4971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heidari S., Palmer-Ross A., Goodman T. Una revisione sistematica della segnalazione di sesso e genere negli studi clinici COVID-19. Vaccines. 2021;9:1322. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pal S., Shekhar R., Kottewar S., Upadhyay S., Singh M., Pathak D., Kapuria D., Barrett E., Sheikh A.B. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Attitude toward Booster Doses among US Healthcare Workers. Vaccines. 2021;9:1358. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lenis-Ballesteros V., Ochoa J., Hincapié-Palacio D., León-Álvarez A., Vargas-Restrepo F., Ospina M.C., Buitrago-Giraldo S., Díaz F.J., Gonzalez-Ortíz D. Seroprevalence of Varicella in Pregnant Women and Newborns in a Region of Colombia. Vaccines. 2021;10:52. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scognamiglio F., Fantini M.P., Reno C., Montalti M., Di Valerio Z., Soldà G., Salussolia A., La Fauci G., Capodici A., Gori D. Vaccinations and Healthy Ageing: How to Rise to the Challenge Following a Life-Course Vaccination Approach. Vaccines. 2022;10:375. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marzouk M., Omar M., Sirison K., Ananthakrishnan A., Durrance-Bagale A., Pheerapanyawaranun C., Porncharoen C., Pimsarn N., Lam S.T., Ung M., et al. Monitoring and Evaluation of National Vaccination Implementation: A Scoping Review of How Frameworks and Indicators Are Used in the Public Health Literature. Vaccines. 2022;10:567. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olszowski R., Zabdyr-Jamróz M., Baran S., Pięta P., Ahmed W. A Social Network Analysis of Tweets Related to Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination in Poland. Vaccines. 2022;10:750. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Crăciun M.-D., Nițescu G.V., Golumbeanu M., Tănase A.-A., Pițigoi D., Săndulescu O., Crăciun P., Enciu B.G., Bălănescu R.N., Ulici A. mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Reactogenicity among Healthcare Workers: Results from an Active Survey in a Pediatric Hospital from Bucharest, January–February 2021. Vaccines. 2022;10:836. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yin H., You Q., Wu J., Jin L. Factors Influencing the Knowledge Gap regarding Influenza and Influenza Vaccination in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China. Vaccines. 2022;10:957. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ma C., Li J., Wang N., Wang Y., Song Y., Zeng X., Zheng C., An Z., Rodewald L., Yin Z. Prioritization of Vaccines for Inclusion into China’s Expanded Program on Immunization: Evidence from Experts’ Knowledge and Opinions. Vaccines. 2022;10:1010. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Waszkiewicz P., Lewulis P., Górski M., Czarnecki A., Feleszko W. Public Vaccination Reluctance: What Makes Us Change Our Minds? Results of A Longitudinal Cohort Survey. Vaccines. 2022;10:1081. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zemer V.S., Grossman Z., Cohen H.A., Hoshen M., Gerstein M., Yosef N., Cohen M., Ashkenazi S. Acceptance Rates of COVID-19 Vaccine Highlight the Need for Targeted Public Health Interventions. Vaccines. 2022;10:1167. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oduwole E.O., Pienaar E.D., Mahomed H., Wiysonge C.S. Overview of Tools and Measures Investigating Vaccine Hesitancy in a Ten Year Period: A Scoping Review. Vaccines. 2022;10:1198. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sallam M., Ghazy R.M., Al-Salahat K., Al-Mahzoum K., AlHadidi N.M., Eid H., Kareem N., Al-Ajlouni E., Batarseh R., Ababneh N.A., et al. The Role of Psychological Factors and Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs in Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake among Jordanian Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines. 2022;10:1355. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bencherit D., Kidar R., Otmani S., Sallam M., Samara K., Barqawi H.J., Lounis M. Knowledge and Awareness of Algerian Students about Cervical Cancer, HPV and HPV Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines. 2022;10:1420. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aleksandric A., Anderson H.I., Melcher S., Nilizadeh S., Wilson G.M. Spanish Facebook Posts as an Indicator of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Texas. Vaccines. 2022;10:1713. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Motta M. The Correlates & Public Health Consequences of Prospective Vaccine Hesitancy among Individuals Who Received COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters in the U.S. Vaccines. 2022;10:1791. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mackenzie L.J., Bousie J.A., Newman P., Waghorn J., Cunningham J.E., Bushell M.-J.A. Healthcare Practitioners Knowledge of Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Vaccines. 2022;10:1991. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10121991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pi Z., Aoyagi K., Arima K., Wu X., Ye Z., Jiang Y. Optimization of Elderly Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Programs in Beijing, China Using Health Economic Evaluations: A Modeling Study. Vaccines. 2023;11:161. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]