Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 9;9(3):65. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9030065

Table 1.

Grading scale for subjective image quality evaluation.

Parameters 5 4 3 2 1
Noise Minimal or no noise No significant noise Noisy diagnostic Significant noise (affects diagnosis) High-level noise (nondiagnostic)
Sharpness Excellent sharpness Good sharpness Moderate sharpness Poor sharpness (bad visibility) Zero visibility
(nondiagnostic)
Contrast Excellent contrast Very good contrast Good contrast Poor contrast (unsatisfactory visualization) Image similar to use of no contrast (nondiagnostic)
Diagnostic confidence Completely confidence High confidence Good confidence Poor confidence No diagnostic confidence (unacceptable)
Artefacts No artefacts Insignificant artefacts Minor artefacts Major artefacts (diagnosis still possible) Artefacts affecting diagnostic information
Blotchy appearance Absent Mild Moderate Significant (diagnosis still possible) Intense (affecting diagnosis)