Table 3.
Distribution of Mtb lineages in this study in comparison with other studies.
| Our Study n (%) | Western Cape n (%) [43] |
Gauteng n (%) [43] |
KZN n (%) [43] |
Free Staten (%) [51] |
Limpopo n (%) [44] |
North- West n (%) [43] |
Zambia n (%) [52] |
Botswana n (%) [53] |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage | Family | 441 | 897 | 142 | 230 | 86 | 226 | 358 | 274 | 458 |
| 2 | Beijing | 185 (42) | 599 (66.8) | 44 (31.0) | 57 (24.8) | 5 (5.8) | 34 (15.0) | 88 (24.6) | 1 (0.4) | 41 (9.0) |
| 4 | LAM | 83 (18.8) | 53 (5.9) | 29 (20.4) | 42 (18.3) | 18 (20.9) | 60 (26.5) | 54 (15.1) | 149 (54.4) | 150 (32.8) |
| 4 | X | 48 (10.9) | 88 (9.8) | 9 (6.3) | 14 (6.1) | 5 (5.8) | 12 (5.3) | 27 (7.5) | 19 (6.9) | 75 (16.4) |
| 4 | T | 34 (7.7) | 61(6.8) | 18 (12.7) | 29 (12.6) | 14 (16.3) | 43 (19.0) | 60 (16.8) | 39 (14.2) | 73 (15.9) |
| 4 | S | 31 (7.0) | 23 (2.6) | 9 (6.3) | 49 (21.3) | 6 (7.0) | 21 (9.1) | 37 (10.3) | 4 (1.5) | 62 (13.5) |
| 1 | EAI MANU |
16 (3.6) 0 |
6 (0.7) 0 |
12 (8.5) 3 (2.1) |
6 (2.6) 2 (0.9) |
0 0 |
11 (4.9) 3 (1.3) |
24 (6.7) 6 (1.7) |
6 (2.2) | 31 (6.8) 2 (0.4) |
| 4 | H | 6 (1.4) | 10(1.1) | 6 (4.8) | 8 (3.5) | 1 (1.2) | 31 (13.7) | 26 (7.3) | 0 | 21 (4.6) |
| 3 | CAS | 5 (1.1) | 8 (0.9) | 2 (1.4) | 5 (2.2) | 0 | 10 (4.4) | 6 (1.7) | 44 (16.1) | 2 (0.4) |
| 3 | U | 0 | 7 (0.8) | 0 | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 3 (0.7) |