Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 30;2023(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4

Comparison 29. EASI versus intracervical prostaglandin E2: all women.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
29.1 Caesarean section 2 155 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.10, 5.12]
29.2 Cervix unfavourable/unchanged after 12‐24 hours 1 85 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.06 [0.00, 0.97]
29.3 Oxytocin augmentation 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.54, 2.25]
29.4 Instrumental vaginal delivery 1 85 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.04, 3.01]
29.5 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes 1 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
29.6 Endometritis 1 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
29.7 Fetal distress 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.06, 1.28]