Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 30;2023(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4

Meetei 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants Inclusion: 1 previous low transverse CS, singleton live pregnancy, cephalic presentation, > 28 weeks and BS < 5.
Exclusion: previous classical or T‐shaped incision, unknown scar, transfundal uterine surgery, medical or obstetric complications that preclude vaginal delivery, placenta previa, low‐lying placenta undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, maternal heart disease, rupture of membranes, interval between previous CS and present pregnancy/conception < 6 months, cervico‐vaginal infection, unclean vaginal examination, infection in previous CS
Interventions 1. Foley catheter (n = 30): 16F, 30 mL balloon, max 12 hours, thereafter start of oxytocin augmentation
2. Oxytocin (n = 30): 1 mUh/minute, after 1 hour 2/mUh/minute, after 1 hour 4 mUh/minute (max 12 hours). oxytocin augmentation as above
Outcomes Change in BS before and after 12 hours of ripening, percentage and time interval of spontaneous labour, insertion and expulsion interval of Foley catheter, route of delivery/outcome of delivery, time required from the beginning of cervical ripening to delivery, hyperstimulation, fetal distress, scar dehiscence, uterine rupture
Notes Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
Study period: July 2004 and November 2005,
Funding: no funding
Declarations of interest: none declared
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation by Tippet's table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not feasible due to nature of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Analysing method not reported and not clear, no missing data or cases
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes were reported in results
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected