Peedicayil 1998.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised equivalence trial | |
Participants | Primigravid, requiring IOL, BS < 5 | |
Interventions | n = 60 'randomised into 2 groups' Foley 12 hours PGE2 intracervically |
|
Outcomes | Change in BS, ripening to delivery interval | |
Notes | None of our outcomes of interest were reported Setting: tertiary level teaching hospital, India Dates of study: not reported Funding sources: not reported Declarations of interest: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequentially‐numbered opaque sealed envelopes. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Person assessing BS was blinded to what agent was used (after 12 hours and removal of agent I presume). |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported how many women were randomised to which group, thus unclear. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The methods section states that only BS and ripening to delivery interval were the outcomes of interest, which is questionable. |
Other bias | High risk | Retrospective power calculation, unclear how many women in which group. |