Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;19(6):1888–1897. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00914

Table 3. Embedding Energy Prediction RMSE (kcal/mol) and Execution Times (s) for the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Complex with PF-00835231a.

method EFull EStatic EInduced t
B3LYP/cc-pVTZ+OPLS-AA 3.800 3.018 1.486 6802
PBE0/cc-pVTZ 0.214 0.217 0.022 6884
B3LYP/cc-pVDZ 0.639 0.504 0.307 2261
BLYP/6-31G* 0.655 0.539 0.326 429
ML/MM qMBIS 1.484 1.394 0.560  
ML/MM MBIS 1.490 1.398 0.549  
ML/MM ⟨χMBIS 1.760 1.644 0.561  
ML/MM ⟨qMBIS 2.046 1.926 0.561  
ML/MM 2.046 1.941 0.567 0.05
GFN2-xTB 4.342     0.7
AM1 10.330     0.9
PM3 10.663     0.9
a

The systematic error was removed by subtracting the mean in all cases (see text). B3LYP/cc-pVTZ+OPLS-AA - energies calculated with B3LYP/cc-pVTZ but using charges from the OPLS-AA force field instead of ffSB14; ML/MM - prediction based on the model trained in section 3.3; ML/MM MBIS - ML/MM with qcore, qval, and s taken directly from MBIS partitioning; ML/MM qMBIS - predicted charges replaced by their exact MBIS values; ML/MM ⟨χMBIS⟩ - electronegativities replaced by their average MBIS values (see SI, section S7); ML/MM ⟨qMBIS⟩ - charges replaced by their average MBIS values. The execution times are single SCF time in the case of DFT and semiempirical methods and time to calculate the embedding energy in the case of ML/MM (using a single CPU core).