Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 24;17(3):e1188. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1188

Table C1.

Provisional risk of bias assessment tool

Description Question Coding
ID Unique study identification # Study For example, AQC001
Paper Surname/year of first author of paper for effect size data extraction Open answer
Research methods—study design and risk of bias Design type What type of study design is used?

1 = RCT (random assignment to households/individuals) or quasi‐RCT

2 = Cluster‐RCT (quasi‐RCT)

3 = Natural experiment: randomised or as‐if randomised

4 = Natural experiment: regression discontinuity (RD)

5 = CBA (nonrandomised assignment with treatment and contemporaneous comparison group, baseline and endline data collection)—individual repeated measurement

6 = CBA pseudo panel (repeated measurement for groups but different individuals)

7 = Interrupted time series (with or without contemporaneous control group)

8 = Panel data, but no baseline (pretest)

9 = Comparison group with endline data only

Methods used for analysis Which methods are used to control for selection bias and confounding?

1 = Statistical matching (PSM, CEM, covariate matching)

2 = Difference in differences (DID) estimation methods

3 = IV‐regression (2‐stage least squares or bivariate probit)

4=Heckman selection model

5 = Fixed effects regression

6 = Covariate adjusted estimation

7 = Propensity weighted regression

8 = Comparison of means

9 = Other

Design and analysis method description Briefly describe the study design and analysis method undertaken by the authors Open answer
Unit of analysis Is unit of analysis in cluster allocation addressed in standard error calculation (RCT and NRS)?

1 = Yes

2 = No

3 = Not reported/unclear

4 = Not applicable

Method used to address differences between UoA and unit of data collection Briefly describe methods used to adjust standard errors to account for correlation of observations within clusters (e.g., cluster‐robust standard errors reported) Open answer
Type of comparison group Indicate type of comparison group

1 = No intervention (service delivery as usual)

2 = Other PITA intervention

3 = Pipeline (wait‐list) control (still service delivery as usual)

Assignment mechanism (1) Mechanism of assignment: was the allocation or identification mechanism random or as good as random?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably yes

3 = Probably no

4 = No

8 = No information/unclear

Assignment justification Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Confounding Group equivalence: was the method of analysis executed adequately to ensure comparability of groups throughout the study and prevent confounding

1 = Yes

2 = Probably yes

3 = Probably no

4 = No

8 = No information/unclear

Confounding justification Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Selection bias Was any differential selection into or out of the study (attrition bias) adequately resolved?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably yes

3 = Probably no

4 = No

8 = No information/unclear

Selection bias justification Justification for coding decision (include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Spill‐overs, cross‐overs and contamination (2) Spill‐overs, cross‐overs and contamination: was the study adequately protected against spill‐overs, cross‐overs and contamination? 1 = Yes, 2 = Probably yes, 3 = Probably no, 4 = No, 8 = No information/unclear
Spill‐overs justification Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Motivation bias Was the process of being observed free from motivation bias (e.g., Hawthorne effects)?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably Yes

3 = Probably No

4 = No

8 = No Information/Unclear

Motivation justification Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Outcome reporting (3) Outcome reporting: was the study free from selective outcome reporting?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably Yes

3 = Probably No

4 = No

8 = No Information/Unclear

Outcome reporting Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Analysis reporting 4: Analysis reporting: was the study free from selective analysis reporting?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably Yes

3 = Probably No

4 = No

8 = No Information/Unclear

Analysis reporting Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Performance bias (5) Performance bias: was the process of being observed free from motivation bias?

1 = Yes

2 = Probably Yes

3 = Probably No

4 = No

8 = No Information/Unclear

Performance bias Justification for coding decision (Include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Other bias (6) Other risks of bias: is the study free from other sources of bias? Including around measurement of the intervention

1 = Yes

2 = Probably Yes

3 = Probably No

4 = No

8 = No Information/Unclear

Other bias Justification for coding decision (include a brief summary of justification for rating, mentioning your response to all sub questions, cite relevant pages) Open answer
Blinded participants Blinding of participants?

1 = Yes

2 = No

9 = N/A

Blinded observers Blinding of outcome assessors?

1 = Yes

2 = No

9 =  N/A

Blinded analysts Blinding of data analysts?

1 = Yes

2 = No

9 = N/A

Method used to blind Describe method(s) used to blind Open answer (including describe method of placebo control)