Abstract
The Covid-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) is an emerging disease affecting immunocompromised patients. Prevention of such infections using probiotics and their metabolites persist as effective therapeutic agents. Therefore, the present study emphasizes on assessment of their efficacy and safety. Samples from different sources like human milk, honey bee intestine, toddy, and dairy milk were collected, screened and characterized for potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and their metabolites to be used as effective antimicrobial agents to curtail CAM. Three isolates were selected based on probiotic properties and characterized as Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBR013, Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBR061 and Pediococcus acidilactici BMOBR041 by 16S rRNA sequencing and MALDI TOF-MS. The antimicrobial activity against standard bacterial pathogens showed ˃9 mm zone of inhibition. Furthermore, the antifungal activity of three isolates was tested against Aspergillus flavus MTCC 2788, Fusarium oxysporum, Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis where the results showed significant inhibition of each fungal strain. Further studies were carried out on lethal fungal pathogens like Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. which are associated with post Covid-19 infection in immunosuppressed diabetic patients. Our studies on CAM inhibitory effect of LAB revealed the efficient inhibition against Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. The cell free supernatants of three LAB showed varied inhibitory activity against these fungi. Following the antimicrobial activity, the antagonistic metabolite 3-Phenyllactic acid (PLA) in culture supernatant was quantified and characterized by HPLC and LC-MS using standard PLA (Sigma Aldrich). The isolate L. pentosus BMOBR013 produced highest PLA (0.441 g/L), followed by P. acidilactici BMOBR041 (0.294 g/L) and L. pentosus BMOBR061 (0.165 g/L). The minimum inhibitory concentration of HPLC eluted PLA on the Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. was found to be 180 mg/ml which was further confirmed by inhibition of total mycelia under live cell imaging microscope.
Introduction
Many broad range opportunistic mycotic infections associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are caused by mainly fungal pathogens as co-infections in Covid-19 patients. In recent years, there has been a large number of cases reported worldwide particularly in India, a life-threatening fungal infection in Covid-19 patients admitted to hospitals known as ‘Mucormycosis’ [1]. It is commonly referred to as ‘Black fungus’ and its occurrence has increased rapidly in the second wave when compared to the first wave of Covid-19 pandemic in India [2]. Mucormycosis is an angioinvasive infection caused by saprophytic fungi belonging to the genera Rhizopus, Mucor, Rhizomucor, Absidia, Cunninghamella, Apophysomyces, and Saksenaea of Order Mucorales [3]. Globally, Rhizopus arrhizus is the most commonly isolated organism from patients in all clinical forms of mucormycosis. It is responsible for approximately 60–70% of mucormycosis cases in humans and also accounts for 90% of the rhino-cerebral form of infection [1, 4]. The mucormycosis is a rare but lethal fungal disease, more aggressive, and commonly infect immunosuppressed patients through inhalation of fungal spores [1, 5]. The fungal spores can infiltrate blood vessels and spread to brain and other vital organs via bloodstream, result in causing infection [3]. The occurrence is more common in patients who are immunosuppressed due to diabetes mellitus (diabetic ketoacidosis form), neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, cancer, higher levels of serum iron, and patients with organ transplantation. As a result, the number of cases is increased with higher susceptibility [4]. Globally, Covid-19 with diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for developing mucormycosis, with an overall mortality rate of 46% [1]. The hallmark of mucormycosis infection is necrosis of host tissue because of extensive angioinvasion, thrombosis, obstruction of blood vessels, and also, the absence of necrotic eschar which does not preclude the diagnosis of infection [6, 7]. In India, uncontrolled diabetes is the most common underlying disease linked with mucormycosis and the prevalence of this secondary infection is approximately 70 times higher compared with global data, with a mortality rate ranging between 28–52% [1, 8].
Gastrointestinal mucormycosis can be acquired through ingestion of contaminated foods or food products like fermented milk and bakery products introduced to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the infection is characterized by fungal invasion into gut mucosa, submucosa, and blood vessels. It accounts for <10% of total cases of mucormycosis, one-third of the cases occur in infants and children which show a higher mortality rate (85%) due to the high occurrence of bowel perforation and therefore establishment of diagnosis is difficult [5].
Probiotics are nonpathogenic, live microorganisms (yeast or bacteria) that when ingested in sufficient quantity confer health benefits to the host [9]. Most probiotics belong to the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) including various species of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus has acknowledged the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) consideration by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [10, 11]. The lactic acid bacteria have generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status approved by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United States (FAO) [10]. Several health benefits associated with human health is conferred by probiotic bacteria, which include reducing the bowel disease, improvement of the normal microbiota and lactose utilization, prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, anti-carcinogenic, anti-cholesteric effect, and increase immune response [12, 13]. Probiotics are known to diminish the severity of GIT and the upper respiratory tract infections by enhancing the innate and adaptive immune systems [14]. Probiotics have been found to employ health benefits via numerous potential mechanisms including clamping down the pathogens, mmunomodulation, maintenance of intestinal barrier function, and modulation of epithelial cell signal transduction [15]. Strikingly, probiotics have been shown to exert strong antimicrobial effects via neutrophils, alveolar macrophage, natural killer cells and elevated levels of pro- inflammatory cytokines like TNF and IL-6 in the lung [14]. Probiotic supplements could be crucial for maintaining an optimal immune system in Covid-19 and its associated opportunistic secondary infections [16]. Additionally, probiotic supplementation could be helpful for tackling CAM/mucormycosis and restoring immunological homeostasis [17]. A wide variety of antimicrobial metabolites are produced by LAB including lactic acid, acetic acid, phenyllactic acid (PLA), hydrogen peroxide, short-chain fatty acids, 4-hydroxy phenyllactic acid, reuterin, cyclic dipeptides, and bacteriocin [18–20].
The 3-Phenyllactic acid (2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid, PLA) and its derivative hydroxyphenyllactic acid (HPLA) are organic acids produced by various LAB species, mainly responsible for antifungal activity but their production is strain-dependent [21]. The PLA is an antagonistic compound with a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, it inhibits fungi such as yeasts (Candida and Rhodotorula spp.), a wide range of molds (Aspergillus and Penicillium spp.) [19, 22]. PLA is responsible for antifungal activity which helps in prolonging the shelf life of foodstuffs, it can diffuse easily into the food and feed due to hydrophilic nature. Also, PLA is used as skin protecting agent to reduce the skin wrinkles, and improve the meat quality when used as feed additive [23]. The PLA is used as a pharmaceutical agent with a great potential for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and inhibition of platelet aggregation since its structural analogue ‘Danshensu’ (Salvia miltiorrhiza) was in practice from Chinese medicinal herb [24].
The current study focuses on the evaluation of probiotic and antimycotic efficiency of Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBR013, isolated from human milk, Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBR061, and Pediococcus acidilactici BMOBR041 isolated from buffalo milk.
Materials and methods
Sample processing and isolation of lactic acid bacteria
A total of 33 samples were collected from different sources like honey bee intestine, soil, toddy, milk from volunteer lactating mothers (Institutional Ethics Committee, Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University. No. 327/IOG/IECBR/2022; Participants were informed about the study and taken written consent), raw milk from cow, goat and buffalos (Institutional Ethics Committee No. 40/25/CVSc, Hyd. IAEC, P.V. Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad), and transported to the laboratory under sterile conditions at 4°C. Aliquots of 0.1mL 10-fold diluted samples were inoculated on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS-GM369, HiMedia, India) agar containing 0.5% (w/v) calcium carbonate (CaCO3-RM1044, HiMedia, India) and plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 24–48 h. Morphological distinct colonies were selected randomly from MRS agar plates andexamined for morphology, gram staining, and catalase production. Finally, gram positive and catalase negative pure cultures were cultured in MRS agar slants and stored at 4°C for further use. Glycerol stock (20% glycerol) of pure cultures was maintained at -80°C for further assays.
Microorganism and media
Bacterial strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 49134), Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 23857), Salmonella typhi (ATCC CVD 909 (202117)), and Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 33499) were procured from the American type culture collection (ATCC). Aspergillus flavus MTCC 2788, R. arrhizus MTCC 24794 were procured from the Microbial type culture collection (MTCC), Pune, India. Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. isolates of nasal sinuses of post Covid-19 mucormycosis infected patient samples procured from NRI Medical College and Hospital, AP). The other fungal cultures like Candida albicans (from patient sample), Candida tropicalis MTCC 184, and Fusarium oxysporum KACC42109 were used in this study. Yeast strains were cultured in yeast extract peptone dextrose agar (YPD-G038, HiMedia, India) and molds in potato dextrose agar (PDA-M096, HiMedia, India) at 28°C for 3–5 days and stored at 4°C. Spore inoculum was prepared by culturing the molds on PDA plates until sporulation occurs, and the spores were collected by vortexing with sterile distilled water containing tween 80 (0.05%) (LQ520X, HiMedia, India). The spore concentration was determined using a haemocytometer and adjusted to 105 spores/ml.
In vitro probiotic characteristics of LAB isolates
Tolerance to virtual gastric and bile juice
Tolerance to simulated gastric juice and bile was evaluated with slight modifications in plate count method [25]. The simulated gastric juice was prepared by dissolving 1% pepsin (w/v) (RM084, HiMedia, India) in MRS broth and pH was adjusted to 2.5 with 5.0 mol/l hydrochloric acid. Ten mL each of overnight grown bacterial cultures was harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm, for 10 min and pellets were washed twice with PBS buffer. Two mL of simulated gastric juice was added to each pellet and 100 μl of suspension was withdrawn at 0, 1, and 2 h of incubation, diluted, inoculated on MRS agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Similarly, for bile tolerance, 2 mL each of bile solution consisting 1.28 g/l NaCl (MB023, HiMedia, India), 0.239 g/l KCl (MB043, HiMedia, India), 6.4 g/l NaHCO3 (MB045, HiMedia, India) and 0.3% (w/v) ox bile (RM621, HiMedia, India) was added to bacterial cell pellets. Bile solution suspension was withdrawn at 0, 1, and 2 h of incubation, diluted and 100 μl of a suitable dilution was inoculated on MRS agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. After incubation, the colonies on the plates were counted. Simulated gastric juice and bile tolerance was evaluated by counting the number of viable colonies, and each strain was carried out in triplicate. The probiotic strain L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 was used as a referral strain.
Tolerance to temperature and sodium chloride
The ability of LAB isolates to grow at different temperatures and in different NaCl concentrations was assessed as previously described [26]. In brief, 1% (v/v) overnight grown LAB cultures were inoculated in 10 mL each of MRS broth tubes containing bromocresol purple indicator with different concentrations of NaCl (w/v) (4, 6.5, and 9.5%) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Similarly, MRS broth tubes containing bromocresol purple indicator were inoculated with 1% LAB cultures and incubated for 24 h at different temperatures (20, 30, 37, 45, 50, 55 and 60°C). After incubation, MRS broth tubes were observed for color change from purple to yellow. The strain L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 was used as referral probiotic strain.
Phenol tolerance
The ability of LAB isolates for tolerance to phenol was assessed according to previously described method [26]. In brief, 1% (v/v) overnight grown probiotic culture inoculum was inoculated in 10 mL sterile MRS broth tubes with specific concentrations of phenol (0.1–0.4%) (P1037, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, growth was observed by measuring OD620. The probiotic strain L. acidophilus was used as referral strain.
Bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity
Bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity of LAB isolates was assessed by using bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons (BATH) method according to the previous protocol [27]. The percent hydrophobicity (H%) was calculated as follows:
Where, A0 and A1 are absorbance measured initial and after solvent extraction.
Auto-aggregation
The auto-aggregation ability of the LAB isolates was tested according to previous protocol described [28]. The auto-aggregation was measured as follows.
Where, A0 is the absorbance at initial and At is absorbance at 24 h of incubation.
β-galactosidase activity
The β-galactosidase activity of the probiotic isolates was determined as previously described [29]. Active LAB cultures were streaked on MRS agar plates containing 60 μL X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-galactopyranoside) (MB069, HiMedia, India) and 10 μL of IPTG (isopropyl-thio-b-D-galactopyranoside) (RM2578, HiMedia, India) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h.
Bile salt hydrolase activity
Bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity of the selected probiotic isolates were evaluated as previously described method [29]. Overnight grown LAB isolates were inoculated on MRS agar plates containing 0.5% (w/v) sodium taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA-RM131, HiMedia, India) and plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The BSH activity was evaluated by formation of opaque halo of precipitate around the wells.
Safety assessment of LAB isolates
Hemolytic activity
Hemolytic activity of selected probiotic isolates was evaluated according to the method described previously [30]. Overnight grown probiotic cultures were inoculated on Columbia blood agar (M144, HiMedia, India) plates supplemented with 5% (v/v) sheep blood, and plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Hemolytic activity was determined as α-hemolysis, β-hemolysis, and non-hemolysis based on the appearance of green zone, transparent zone and no halo around colonies, respectively.
Antibiotic sensitivity
Antibiotic sensitivity of selected LAB isolates was determined by disc diffusion method as previously reported [26]. Overnight grown LAB cultures were swabbed evenly on MRS agar plates using sterile cotton swabs and allowed to dry for 15 min. Different concentrations of antibiotic discs (HiMedia, India) were placed on test plates, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. After incubation, zone of inhibition (diameter in mm) around disc was measured using ruler. Results were presented as an average from triplicate and categorized as resistance R (≤15 mm), intermediate susceptibility I (16–20 mm) and susceptibility S (≥21 mm).
Adhesion assay
Adhesion of probiotic bacterial isolates to HT-29 intestinal cells was determined according to the method described [31, 32]. The human intestinal epithelial cell lines (HT-29) was procured from National Center for Cell Sciences (NCCS), Pune, India. The cell suspension with 1×105 cells prepared in 4 ml complete Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, Thermo fischer scientific, USA) was transferred in six well tissue culture plates. The medium was changed every alternate day until cells attained full confluency. Before adherence assay, cells were fed with DMEM without antibiotics and washed thrice with PBS (pH 7.4). Fresh DMEM (without serum and antibiotics) was added to each well of the culture plates and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After incubation, 1×106 CFU/ml of probiotic bacterial isolates suspended in plain DMEM without antibiotics were added and incubated for 2 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. The cells were washed thrice with PBS and added 3 mL of methanol to each well for fixing the cells, followed by incubation at room temperature for 10 min. Later, the cells were stained with Giemsa stain (HiMedia, India) for 20 min at room temperature. The wells were washed with ethanol and plates were air-dried at room temperature. The number of probiotic bacteria present in 20 random microscopic fields was counted and grouped into non-adhesive, adhesive and strongly adhesive.
Molecular based characterization of LAB isolates by 16S rRNA sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
The selected isolates were genotypically characterized based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing which was carried out at Macrogen Inc., South Korea. The 16S rRNA partial sequences obtained were further analyzed by BLAST in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to check the similarity with existing sequences. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates were deposited in the GenBank database for accession numbers. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis (MEGA) software, version 7.0 with maximum likelihood method [33].
Bacterial identification using MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS) was carried out by direct spotting method. A single colony of LAB isolate was picked from pure culture plate using a disposable loop and directly spotted on a MALDI-TOF target slide and inserted into the mass spectrometer to record the fingerprints (BioMerieux, France; version V.3.2.0 software [34].
Characterization of LAB isolates using MALDI-TOF (VITEK-MS) was carried out by comparing with known bacterial information in the database. In peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) matching, the MS spectrum of unknown bacteria was compared with the MS spectra of known bacteria of the database [35].
Antagonistic activity of LAB isolates against bacterial and fungal pathogens
The antibacterial activity of LAB isolates against bacterial pathogens was determined by agar well diffusion method as previously reported [11]. Overnight grown LAB cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered using 0.22 μm syringe filters. Pathogenic bacterial suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland scale and spread on the surface of nutrient agar plates with sterile cotton swabs and 6 mm diameter wells were made using cork borer. A volume of 100 μl cell free supernatant was loaded in each well and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. After incubation, zone of inhibition (diameter in mm) was measured around the wells using ruler.
The antifungal activity of three LAB isolates was determined by agar overlay method [28]. Six fungal species like A. flavus MTCC 2788, F. oxysporum, R. arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp., and two Mucor sp. and two yeasts like C. albicans, C. tropicalis were selected to determine the antifungal activity of LAB isolates. Overnight grown LAB cultures were streaked on MRS agar plates, incubated at 37°C for 48 h. A volume of 50 μl of each fungal/yeast suspension (105 spores/ml) was evenly mixed with molten PDA/YPD soft agar (0.7% agar), overlaid on the LAB culture MRS plates and incubated at 28°C for 3–5 days. After incubation, the plates were examined for the inhibition zone around the streaked area of LAB isolates.
In both, the agar overlay method and well diffusion assay, zone of inhibition diameter ˃1mm was considered as positive inhibitory activity.
Preparation of cell free supernatant (CFS)
Extraction of antimicrobial compound from LAB-CFS was carried out according to the previously reported method [19, 36]. In brief, overnight grown LAB cultures (1%) were inoculated in 3 L of MRS broth and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The cell free supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, at 4°C and the supernatant was filtered through 0.45-μm filter membrane (Millipore). The supernatants were extracted using ethyl acetate (1:3 v/v) (109623, Merck, USA) and the solvent was concentrated in a rotary evaporator. The partial purified cell free supernatant was used for further analysis.
Antifungal activity of LAB isolates against Covid-19 associated mucormycosis strains
The antifungal activity of LAB-CFS was evaluated by the agar well diffusion method [37]. A volume of 20 μL of Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. (105 spores /ml) suspensions were evenly mixed with PDA, poured into sterile petri plates and 6 mm diameter wells were made using sterile cork borer in the agar. The wells were loaded with 100 μl of 10-fold concentrated LAB-CFS and incubated for 5 days at 28°C and the inhibition zones were observed around the wells. The results were compared with R. arrhizus MTCC 24794.
Detection and quantification of 3-PLA by HPLC and LC-MS
The characterization of 3-phenyllactic acid was carried out by HPLC and LC-MS according to the modified previous method [36]. The preparative reversed phase HPLC (Shimadzu Nexera LC system) equipped with photodiode array detector (SPD-M20A) was used to detect and quantify PLA. The chromatographic separation was carried out using C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, Shimadzu). PLA was eluted under isocratic run using HPLC grade water and acetonitrile (100030, Merck, USA) (1:1) as a mobile phase. Both solvents were filtered through 0.22μm disposable filter membrane and degassed for 15 min before use. Cell free supernatants of LAB isolates were filtered through 0.22 μm syringe filters (Nylon, Whatman). The flow rate was set to 1.0 ml/min, the column temperature was maintained at 30°C and a volume of 20 μl supernatant was injected manually. The elution was monitored using an ultraviolet (UV) wavelength set to 210 nm. Un-inoculated MRS broth was used as negative control and the 3-PLA (P7251, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as standard (1 mg/ml). Chromatographic data was analyzed with the software Lab Solutions version 6.72 (Shimadzu Corporation). Particular peak fraction was collected, incubated at 40°C for removal of acetonitrile by evaporation and then freeze dried.
The purified fraction was analysed by LC-MS, performed on an ACQUITY and an UPLC system quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) with electrospray ionization. For chromatographic separation, a BEH C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm; Waters) was used and temperature was maintained at 25°C. The mobile phase was comprised of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% formic acid in Milli Q water (B). The fraction was eluted with a linear gradient of solvent A increasing from 5% to 90% at a flow rate of 1.0 ml /min for 10 min. The HPLC output was split to a reduced flow rate of 0.2 ml/min before entering the electrospray ionization source. The mass scan range was m/z 100–500.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3-phenyllactic acid
The MIC of PLA against R. arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. were determined as previously described [38]. A volume of 20 μl of Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. suspensions (105 spores/ml) were evenly mixed with molten PDA medium, poured into petri plates and 6 mm diameter wells were made using sterile cork borer in the agar plates. A volume of 100 μl 3-phenyllactic acid at different concentrations (5, 10, 15….210 mg/ml) were loaded in the wells and incubated at 28°C for 5 days. The MIC was considered when there was a visible growth inhibition after incubation at the lowest concentration of PLA.
Microscopic observation of fungal growth inhibition
The fungal growth inhibition assay was conducted in 6 well microtitre plates to assess the inhibitory activity of PLA on Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. A volume of 20 μl Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. spore suspensions (105 spores/ml) were added in potato dextrose broth separately and mixed with MIC of PLA which were considered as treated and the culture broth without PLA were considered as untreated. The treated and untreated suspensions were made up to 2 ml with sterile distilled water and incubated at 28°C for 48–72 h. After incubation, samples were observed under EVOS live cell imaging inverted microscope and images were captured.
Statistical analysis
All the experiments were carried out in triplicates and the results were calculated as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate. The results were statistically subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Tukey’s post-hoc one-way analysis (p <0.05).
Results
Screening and characterization of LAB isolates
A total of 129 strains were isolated from different sources. Among them, 19 strains were found to be Gram positive, catalase negative and non-spore forming, therefore considered as presumptive lactic acid bacteria. Finally, three strains were selected based on potential probiotic properties including antimicrobial activity. The three bacterial strains thrived in temperature ranging from 20 to 50°C and similarly, could tolerate up to 9.5% NaCl concentration (Table 1). Further, the selected strains were characterized by 16S rRNA sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS spectrometry. The 16S rRNA sequence of BMOBR013 isolate from human milk (long rod) and BMOBR061 isolate from buffalo milk (short rod) showed 100% similarity with Lactobacillus pentosus. Whereas BMOBR041 isolate from buffalo milk showed 99.9% similarity with Pediococcus acidilactici. The sequences of three isolates BMOBR013, BMOBR041 and BMOBR061 were submitted to NCBI GenBank database and acquired accession numbers MN880113, MN880127, and MN880129, respectively. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA software, version 7.0 by maximum likelihood method (Fig 1).
Table 1. Primary probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacterial (LAB) strains.
| Isolates | Autoaggregation (%) | Hydrophobicity (%) | Temperature tolerance (°C) | BSH activity | NaCl tolerance (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| xylene | toluene | |||||
| BMOBR013 | 94.82±0.71 | 94.28±0.05 | 97.05 ± 0.06 | 20–50 | + | 4–9.5 |
| BMOBR061 | 94.77±0.86 | 96.45±0.96 | 96.75 ± 0.57 | 20–50 | + | 4–9.5 |
| BMOBR041 | 95.66±0.64 | 94.81±2.24 | 96.96 ± 0.57 | 20–50 | + | 4–9.5 |
| L. acidophilus | 94.33±0.03 | 95.51±1.37 | 94.99 ± 0.12 | 20–45 | - | 4–6.5 |
‘+’ indicates presence and ‘–’ indicates absence of activity. Auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity were performed in triplicates, and data expressed as mean ± S.D (p <0.05).
Fig 1.
Phylogenetic analysis of the LAB isolates based on 16S rRNA gene sequence a) Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBRO13, b) Lactobacillus pentosus BMOBRO61 and c) Pediococcus acidilactici BMOBRO41. The dendrogram was constructed based on the BLAST algorithm and maximum likelihood method using MEGA X software with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
In vitro assessment of probiotic attributes
Survival of probiotic LAB when taken orally and exposed to gastric juice and bile is a prerequisite step for reaching intestine, colonization and metabolic activity. In this study, isolates L. pentosus BMOBR013, L. pentosus BMOBR061, and P. acidilactici BMOBR041 showed the survival rate of ≥80% at pH 2.5 (1% pepsin) and ≥75% at 0.3% bile after 2 h of exposure with a significant variability (p < 0.05) (Fig 2a). The survival of the isolates BMOBR013, BMOBR061 and BMOBR041 at pH 2.5 containing 1% pepsin was found to be 98.8%, 97.1%, 90.2%, and 89.8%, 83.7%, 84.1%, after 1 and 2 h, respectively. The survival of the same isolates in bile was found to be 95.6%, 82.9%, 93.2%, and 90.9%, 77.5%, 88.4% after 1 and 2 h, respectively. Assessment of safety by hemolysis is an essential and one of the important properties of probiotic candidate. None of the strains showed hemolytic activity. Thus, the three isolates were selected for further probiotic characterization. The same LAB strains showed remarkable auto-aggregation ranging from 94.77 to 95.66% at 24 h and hydrophobicity ranging from 94.28 to 96.45%, and 96.75 to 97.05% for xylene and toluene, respectively (Table 1). The auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity of three LAB isolates differ significantly (p < 0.05). This result indicates that these strains are potentially capable of adhering to epithelial cells. The adhesion efficiency of three selected strains to HT-29 cells was examined by direct microscopic observation after Giemsa staining. The adhesion ability of isolates was strain-dependent. Three strains were strongly adhesive and the results showed significant count more than 100 bacteria attached to the HT-29 cells around the 20 microscopic fields. In qualitative screening of β-galactosidase activity, three strains showed the presence of blue colour colonies on culture plates, and these probiotic strains can reduce the lactose intolerance. The BSH activity of three strains showed the ability to hydrolyse sodium salt of taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA), which is represented as opaque halo of precipitation around the wells (Fig 2b). The tolerance of LAB isolates to phenol concentrations (0.1–0.4%) was found to be efficient (Fig 2a). The results showed different degrees of tolerance to phenol and were capable of growing efficiently in the presence of 0.4% phenol with OD values >1.9. The viability of LAB isolates differs significantly (p < 0.05) with respect to phenol concentration.
Fig 2.
a. In vitro cell viability of bacterial isolates BMOBR013, BMOBR061 and BMOBR041 (A) acid tolerance, (B) bile tolerance (0.3%), and (C) phenol tolerance. All the three experiments carried out in triplicates and error bars indicate standard deviation of the mean values obtained from statistical analysis by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis (p < 0.05). b. Bile salt hydrolase activity of LAB strains (A) L. pentosus BMOBR013, (B) L. pentosus BMOBR061, (C) P. acidilactici BMOBR041, (D) L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 on MRS-sodium taurodeoxycholic acid.
Antibiotic sensitivity
The antibiotic sensitivity of L. pentosus BMOBR013, L. pentosus BMOBR061 and P. acidilactici BMOBR041 isolates were assessed with 12 different antibiotics by disc diffusion method. All the three isolates showed resistant to vancomycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, gentamycin, lincomycin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and penicillin-G but they were sensitive to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, ampicillin and tetracycline. The probiotic bacterium, L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 was used as referral probiotic strain (Table 2).
Table 2. Antibiotic sensitivity of three LAB isolates using disc diffusion method.
| Concentration | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | (μg) | BMOBR013 | BMOBR061 | BMOBR041 | L. acidophilus |
| Chloramphenicol (C) | 30 | S | S | S | S |
| Tetracycline (TE) | 30 | S | S | S | I |
| Erythromycin (E) | 15 | I | S | S | S |
| Ampicillin (AMP) | 10 | S | S | I | S |
| Clindamycin (CD) | 2 | R | I | I | R |
| Ceftriaxone (CTR) | 10 | I | R | R | R |
| Kanamycin (K) | 30 | R | R | R | R |
| Lincomycin (L) | 10 | R | R | R | R |
| Streptomycin (S) | 10 | R | R | R | R |
| Rifampicin (RIF) | 5 | R | R | R | R |
| Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | 5 | R | R | R | R |
| Gentamycin (GEN) | 10 | R | R | R | R |
| Vancomycin (VA) | 30 | R | R | R | R |
| Penicillin-G (P) | 10 Units | R | R | R | R |
S = Sensitive; I = Intermediate; R = Resistant. The experiment was performed triplicate in each isolate
Antimicrobial activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens
Antimicrobial activity is one of the significant properties of probiotics. In the current study, the probiotic strains were tested for antimicrobial activity against standard pathogenic bacteria. All the three LAB strains showed greater than 9 mm zone of inhibition against all the standard bacterial pathogens. The probiotic isolates L. pentosus BMOBR013 and L. pentosus BMOBR061 showed highest antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa with inhibition zones of 24.6 and 19.3 mm, respectively (Fig 3).
Fig 3.
Antimicrobial activity of LAB isolates (A) L. pentosus BMOBR013, (B) L. pentosus BMOBR061, (C) P. acidilactici BMOBR041, (D) L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 against standard bacterial pathogens. Experiment was carried out in triplicate, and data expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.
The antifungal activity of the LAB strains was tested against A. flavus MTCC 2788, F. oxysporum, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, R. arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp., and two Mucor sp. by the agar overlay method. The probiotic strains BMOBR013, BMOBR061, and BMOBR041 showed variable degrees of fungal inhibition after 4 days of incubation (Fig 4). Antifungal activity of three LAB-CFS against R. arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. using agar well diffusion method showed efficient inhibitory activity on par with standard PLA (Fig 5).
Fig 4.
Antifungal activity of two L. pentosus strains and one P. acidilactici against fungal pathogens by agar over lay method (A) Rhizopus arrhizus MTCC 24794, (B) Rhizopus sp., (C) Mucor sp. 1, (D) Mucor sp. 2, (E) Aspergillus flavus MTCC 2788, (F) Fusarium oxysporum, (G) Candida albicans, (H) Candida tropicalis.
Fig 5. Antifungal activity by the agar well diffusion method showing inhibition of Rhizopus arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp., Mucor sp. 1, and Mucor sp. 2 with cell free supernatant of three LAB isolates on par with standard strain (L. acidophilus) and 3-PLA (Sigma Aldrich).
Characterization and quantification of PLA
The antagonistic metabolite PLA produced by three LAB isolates was detected and quantified by HPLC, the retention time of the standard 3-PLA was found to be 7.7 which is similar to the PLA of LAB isolates (Fig 6). The isolate L. pentosus BMOBR013 has the ability to produce more PLA (0.441 g/L) than other two strains P. acidilactici BMOBR041 and L. pentosus BMOBR061 which produced 0.294 and 0.165 g/L, respectively. Further, confirmation and molar mass of PLA was carried out using LC-MS and illustrated in Fig 7. The molar mass of the LAB produced PLA was found to be 166 g/mol, which is in accordance with the standard PLA(Sigma-Aldrich). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of HPLC eluted PLA against R. arrhizus MTCC24794, Rhizopus sp., and two Mucor sp. was found to be 180 mg/ml and is illustrated in the Fig 8. The MIC of PLA on pathogenic fungal strains showed mycelial growth inhibition, whereas in untreated samples i.e., without PLA, there was no inhibition of mycelial growth was observed with both the species of fungal pathogens (Fig 9).
Fig 6.
HPLC profile of 3-phenyllactic acid produced by (A) L. pentosus BMOBR013, (B) L. pentosus BMOBR061, (C) P. acidilactici BMOBR041, (D) L. acidophilus NCIM 2285, (E) 3-PLA (Sigma Aldrich).
Fig 7.
Confirmation and molar mass detection of3-phenyllactic acid by LC-MS (A) Standard 3-PLA (Sigma Aldrich), (b) LAB isolates.
Fig 8. Evaluation of minimum inhibitory concentration of 3-phenyllactic acid against Rhizopus arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp., Mucor sp. 1, and Mucor sp. 2.
Fig 9. Mycelial inhibition of Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. using HPLC eluted 3-phenyllactic acid under EVOS live cell imaging microscopy resulted in minimum inhibitory concentration (180 mg/ml).
(A) Rhizopus sp. (untreated), (B) Rhizopus sp. treated with PLA, (C) Mucor sp. (untreated), (D) Mucor sp. treated with PLA.
Discussion
In the present study, three LAB strains were isolated from human breast milk and buffalo milk which were characterized for their potential probiotic properties. The selected isolates L. pentosus (BMOBR013, BMOBR61), and P. acidilactici BMOBR041 showed more than 83% survival in simulated gastric juice (1% pepsin, pH 2.5) and more than 77% survival at 0.3% ox bile after 2 h of incubation in the medium. The present findings are higher in accordance with previous studies [13, 39]. The bacterial isolate L. pentosus BMOBR013 showed maximum survival of 90% in the gastrointestinal conditions compared to P. acidilactici BMOBR041 and L. pentosus BMOBR061. In the present study, the survival of probiotic isolates in low pH and bile, significantly vary from one strain to another. The BSH activity of probiotic bacteria determines its tolerance to bile salts and reduction of serum cholesterol in the host [40]. The cholesterol-lowering effect of probiotic bacteria is primarily based on BSH activity [41]. Our findings are similar to previous studies [42] who reported bile salt precipitation around the colonies of LAB. The growth of three LAB isolates was observed at temperatures ranging from 20–50°C and able to tolerate 4–9.5% NaCl concentrations while L. acidophilus NCIM 2285 could tolerate up to 45°C and 6.5% NaCl. These findings are in agreement with previous studies [26, 43] where they reported the tolerance of LAB to higher temperature and salt concentration.
The absence of haemolytic activity is to be evaluated as a safety aspect of the probiotic candidate. All the three LAB isolates showed γ-hemolytic activity (i.e., no hemolysis) indicating non-virulence and lack of hemolysin. The antibiotic sensitivity of all the three strains revealed resistant to vancomycin, gentamicin, streptomycin, kanamycin, ciprofloxacin, lincomycin, rifampicin, and penicillin. The present findings are similar to previous studies [25, 44] where they reported similar resistance of LAB with the same antibiotics. Strains that can be used as probiotics should show resistance to some antibiotics to survive in the GIT and to impart beneficial activities to the host [26]. The intrinsic antibiotic resistant nature of probiotic bacteria can be administered along with antibiotics use in the treatment of intestinal disorders or infections, and it could be useful for restoring the gut microbiota after antibiotic treatment [26].
The surface properties like auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity are key factors that determine the adhesion and colonization efficiency of probiotic bacteria to intestinal epithelial cells, which would enable biofilm formation to protect the host from pathogenic colonization [26, 27]. In the present study, three LAB strains showed variable hydrophobicity ranging from 94 to 97%, which is in agreement with Fonseca et al [45] who reported 96.06% hydrophobicity by L. plantarum. In comparison to the results attained by Yasmin et al [27] and Fonseca et al [45], our probiotic strains showed a higher auto-aggregation value of 95.6%. Similar to present findings, Tuo et al [46] reported that the probiotic strain L. plantarum showing higher auto-aggregation also showed high hydrophobic activity. Therefore, high hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation of probiotic bacteria are found to be positively correlated with strong adhesion ability [47]. A similar result was observed in the current study, where the LAB isolates showed strong adhesion towards intestinal cancer cell lines (HT-29) indicating that colonizing ability to the intestinal epithelium that represents a barrier to protect the GIT from pathogens.
Lactose maldigestion and/or intolerance are due to lack of β-galactosidase enzyme, lactose indigestion can be improved by consuming probiotic bacteria that produce lactose hydrolyzing enzyme i.e., β-galactosidase. Our results are consistent with the previous study [29]. Hence, LAB isolates could be beneficial in the food industry and also play an effective role in the treatment of lactose intolerance as nutritional supplement. The resistance to phenol is an important factor for probiotic bacteria to survive in the GIT, where the intestinal microbiota can deaminate few aromatic acids that are derived from endogenous or dietary proteins and may lead to the formation of phenols [28]. In the present study, three probiotic strains are found to be tolerant to 0.4% phenol with OD value of >1.9. These findings are in agreement with Reuben et al [26] who reported <0.3 OD value with 0.4% phenol tolerance.
Currently, several molecular tools are used for the characterization of LAB species, particularly 16S rRNA gene sequencing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and its related PCR-based techniques. In recent years, Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been introduced with marked success into routine clinical microbiological laboratories for bacterial identification [48]. The identification of LAB species success rate was higher using MALDI-TOF MS i.e., 93% specificity at the species level in comparison with a molecular method such as 16S rDNA gene sequencing (77%) [49]. In the present study, the results showed 100% congruency between 16S rRNA sequence analysis and MALDI- TOF MS in the identification of two L. pentosus, and one P. acidilactici. The characterization of LAB species based on MALDI-TOF MS could be an alternative to biochemical and molecular biology-based identification methods, due to its rapid, accurate, ease of use and low cost per analysis, high throughput use, sensitivity, and specificity for identification of LAB species [49, 50].
Probiotic bacteria produce antimicrobial compounds and it is one of the crucial characteristics for competitive exclusion of pathogens. In this study, L. pentosus (BMOBR013 and BMOBR061) and P. acidilactici BMOBR041 showed strong inhibitory activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria including B. subtilis, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhi. Also, showed inhibition against A. flavus MTCC 2788, F. oxysporum, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis. Our results are in accordance with previous studies [43, 51–53] that studied on antimicrobial activity of probiotic LAB strains. Among the three isolates, L. pentosus BMOBR013 showed highest antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa. In the present study, the three strains showed a broad range of antimicrobial activity against bacteria, yeasts and molds. The results of our study differ with Okkers et al [54] who reported the inhibition of C. albicans by L. pentosus, but not towards filamentous fungi. The antibacterial activity of PLA was first reported in Geotrichum candidum, and it was also found that D-PLA exerts stronger antibacterial activity than L-PLA [55]. The production of PLA was first characterized by Lavermicocca et al [56], who purified the antagonistic compound from cell-free supernatant of L. plantarum 21B. Bacteriocin like nisin produced by LAB whose inhibitory effects restricted to gram-positive bacteria whereas 3-PLA possesses a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against bacteria and fungi [57]. The use of PLA is limited due to its low production by the known LAB species, for large-scale production, high yielding strains are required. The detection and quantification of antimicrobial compound PLA produced by our LAB isolates were carried out using HPLC and compared with the standard DL-3-PLA (Sigma-Aldrich). The HPLC profile of standard PLA has a similar retention time (7.7) with the PLA of our isolates BMOBR013, BMOBR061, and BMOBR041. Further, identification and molar mass of PLA was confirmed by LC-MS analysis. Zhang et al [24] reported that L. plantarum IMAU10124 showed 0.229 g/L PLA which is less than the PLA produced by our isolate L. acidophilus BMOBR013 in MRS medium. Compared to previous studies, L. pentosus BMOBR013 is found to be the highest PLA (0.441 g/L) producing probiotic strain followed by P. acidilactici BMOBR041 (0.294 g/L) without optimizing the production parameters.
The pandemic of Covid-19 with its first and second waves has driven the experiments to study LAB strains against Covid-19 associated mucormycosis causing fungal organisms. Among all the mucormycosis cases, rhino-ortal-cerebral infection is the most commonly encountered form, followed by the pulmonary and cutaneous type [1, 5]. The pulmonary mucormycosis is seen in patients with hematological malignancies, which invade lung-adjacent organs i.e., pericardium, mediastinum, and chest wall with an overall mortality rate of 76% [5]. Patients who are admitted and exposed to mechanical ventilation, various emergency procedures, breaches in asepsis, and prolonged hospitalization may have chances of getting opportunistic secondary bacterial and fungal infections [16]. The prolonged use of steroids has often been linked with numerous opportunistic fungal infections such as mucormycosis and aspergillosis, even a short-term steroid treatment has been recently reported to be associated with mucormycosis mainly in diabetes mellitus patients [1]. The excessive use of steroidal drugs to control Covid-19 may be directly associated with the suppressing immunity of the patients; consequently, it allows opportunistic fungal colonization, leading to mucormycosis at any phase of the disease [58, 59]. In India, the major drawback in the management of mucormycosis infections is lacuna in treatment procedures and the financial instability of patients to afford liposomal AmB drug [8]. The administration of high doses of steroids used in treating mucormycosis leads to severe side effects imparting a major impact on the kidney [60]. Several studies have shown that probiotics used as a nutritional supplement may play a beneficial role in maintaining immune homeostasis during Covid-19 associated mucormycosis, and decrease the severity of GIT infections, candidiasis, and other fungal infections [17]. Probiotics are used as nutritional supplements in Covid-19 patients to diminish opportunistic secondary infections, they could be crucial in maintaining an optimal immune system and with their ability to modulate gut microbiota [16]. Thus, the administration of probiotics can be a significant way to resolve the severity of fungal infections. While many researchers have reported the antifungal activity of probiotic bacteria, the exact underlying mechanism is poorly understood. There is no validated specific laboratory biomarker for the diagnosis of mucormycosis co-infection incidence in Covid-19 unlike (1, 3)-β-D-glucan and galactomannan markers which are used for diagnosis of other invasive fungal infections [61]. The results obtained by our probiotic LAB-CFS showed good inhibitory activity against R. arrhizus MTCC 24794, Rhizopus sp. and two Mucor sp. Our study on MIC of PLA against mucormycosis causing fungal strains like Rhizopus sp. and 2 Mucor sp. showed 180 mg/ml. The present findings of MIC are on par with previous studies where they reported the range of inhibitory concentration of 50–166 mg/ml of PLA against fungal pathogens like A. niger, A. flavus, and Rhizopus stolonifer [56]. The live-cell imaging studies showed that MIC of PLA could inhibit the mycelial growth of mucormycosis causing Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of antifungal activity of LAB against Covid-19 associated mucormycosis infection. Further, there is a need to understand the mechanism of action of antifungal compound against mucormycosis infection. The present work gives a primary insight into the role of probiotics in fatal infections like mucormycosis and their effects paving the way in the treatment of infection.
Conclusion
The LAB isolates of our study like L. pentosus (BMOBR013 and BMOBR061) and P. acidilactici BMOBR041, isolated from human and buffalo milk showed potential probiotic characteristics along with efficient antagonistic activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens including mucormycosis causing strains. Further studies proved the other health benefits of the three isolates. The PLA produced from LAB is commonly used as a bio preservative in the food industry as it extends the shelf life of food and food stuff, also inhibiting the mucormycosis infection causing Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. More insights into exact mechanism of antagonistic compound PLA against mucormycosis causing fungi especially Rhizopus sp. and Mucor sp. would create ways for effective prophylaxis of the disease.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This work was financially supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), Govt. of India through CSIR-UGC fellowship (Ref. No: 21/06/2015(I)EU-V), the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India through RUSA 2.0 program and Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India through DST-PURSE program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Singh AK, Singh R, Joshi SR, Misra A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19: a systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2021. Jul 1;15(4):102146. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raut A, Huy NT. Rising incidence of mucormycosis in patients with COVID-19: another challenge for India amidst the second wave?. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2021. Aug 1;9(8):e77. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00265-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hartnett KP, Jackson BR, Perkins KM, Glowicz J, Kerins JL, Black SR, et al. A guide to investigating suspected outbreaks of mucormycosis in healthcare. Journal of Fungi. 2019. Sep;5(3):69. doi: 10.3390/jof5030069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ibrahim AS, Spellberg B, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012. Feb 1;54(suppl_1):S16–22. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ertugrul MB, Arikan-Akdagli S. Mucormycosis. In Emerging Infectious Diseases 2014. Jan 1 (pp. 309–321). Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Skiada A, Pavleas I, Drogari-Apiranthitou M. Epidemiology and diagnosis of mucormycosis: an update. Journal of Fungi. 2020. Dec;6(4):265. doi: 10.3390/jof6040265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Werthman-Ehrenreich A. Mucormycosis with orbital compartment syndrome in a patient with COVID-19. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021. Apr 1;42:264–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prakash H, Chakrabarti A. Epidemiology of mucormycosis in India. Microorganisms. 2021. Mar;9(3):523. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Afrin S, Akter S, Begum S, Hossain MN. The prospects of lactobacillus oris as a potential probiotic with cholesterol-reducing property from mother’s milk. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021. Mar 4;8:64. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.619506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oliveira PM, Zannini E, Arendt EK. Cereal fungal infection, mycotoxins, and lactic acid bacteria mediated bioprotection: From crop farming to cereal products. Food microbiology. 2014. Feb 1;37:78–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Touret T, Oliveira M, Semedo-Lemsaddek T. Putative probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from sauerkraut fermentations. PLoS One. 2018. Sep 7;13(9):e0203501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Argyri AA, Zoumpopoulou G, Karatzas KA, Tsakalidou E, Nychas GJ, Panagou EZ, et al. Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests. Food microbiology. 2013. Apr 1;33(2): 282–91. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kumar A, Kumar D. Characterization of Lactobacillus isolated from dairy samples for probiotic properties. Anaerobe. 2015. Jun 1;33:117–23. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gohil K, Samson R, Dastager S, Dharne M. Probiotics in the prophylaxis of COVID-19: something is better than nothing. 3 Biotech. 2021. Jan; 11(1):1–0. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02554-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nguyen QV, Chong LC, Hor YY, Lew LC, Rather IA, Choi SB. Role of probiotics in the management of COVID-19: A computational perspective. Nutrients. 2022. Jan 10;14(2):274. doi: 10.3390/nu14020274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bhardwaj A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19, host-iron assimilation: Probiotics can be novel therapy. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2021. Apr;65(2):138. doi: 10.25259/IJPP_191_2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Samson R, Dharne M. COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: evolving technologies for early and rapid diagnosis. 3 Biotech. 2022. Jan;12(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-03080-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Valan Arasu M, Jung MW, Ilavenil S, Jane M, Kim DH, Lee KD, et al. Isolation and characterization of antifungal compound from L actobacillus plantarum KCC‐10 from forage silage with potential beneficial properties. Journal of applied microbiology. 2013. Nov;115(5):1172–85. doi: 10.1111/jam.12319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Valerio F, Lavermicocca P, Pascale M, Visconti A. Production of phenyllactic acid by lactic acid bacteria: an approach to the selection of strains contributing to food quality and preservation. FEMS microbiology letters. 2004. Apr 1;233(2):289–95. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nasrollahzadeh A, Mokhtari S, Khomeiri M, Saris PE. Antifungal preservation of food by lactic acid bacteria. Foods. 2022. Jan 29;11(3):395. doi: 10.3390/foods11030395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mu W, Yu S, Zhu L, Zhang T, Jiang B. Recent research on 3-phenyllactic acid, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial compound. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012. Sep;95(5):1155–63. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4269-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jung S, Hwang H, Lee JH. Effect of lactic acid bacteria on phenyllactic acid production in kimchi. Food Control. 2019. Dec 1;106:106701. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaudhari SS, Gokhale DV. Phenyllactic acid: A potential antimicrobial compound in lactic acid bacteria. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. Open Access. 2016;2(1). doi: 10.15406/jbmoa.2016.02.00037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang X, Zhang S, Shi Y, Shen F, Wang H. A new high phenyl lactic acid-yielding Lactobacillus plantarum IMAU10124 and a comparative analysis of lactate dehydrogenase gene. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2014. Jul 1;356(1):89–96. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kook SY, Chung EC, Lee Y, Lee DW, Kim S. Isolation and characterization of five novel probiotic strains from Korean infant and children faeces. PLoS One. 2019. Oct 31;14(10):e0223913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reuben RC, Roy PC, Sarkar SL, Alam RU, Jahid IK. Isolation, characterization, and assessment of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as poultry probiotics. BMC microbiology. 2019. Dec;19(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1626-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yasmin I, Saeed M, Khan WA, Khaliq A, Chughtai MF, Iqbal R, et al. In vitro probiotic potential and safety evaluation (Hemolytic, cytotoxic activity) of bifidobacterium strains isolated from raw camel milk. Microorganisms. 2020. Mar;8(3):354. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Somashekaraiah R, Shruthi B, Deepthi BV, Sreenivasa MY. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from neera: a naturally fermenting coconut palm nectar. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019:1382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nami Y, Vaseghi Bakhshayesh R, Mohammadzadeh Jalaly H, Lotfi H, Eslami S, Hejazi MA. Probiotic properties of Enterococcus isolated from artisanal dairy products. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019. Feb 26;10:300. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tenea GN, Gonzalez GL, Moreno JL. Probiotic Characteristics and Antimicrobial Potential of a Native Bacillus subtilis Strain Fa17. 2 Rescued from Wild Bromelia sp. Flowers. Microorganisms. 2022. Apr 21;10(5):860. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duary RK, Rajput YS, Batish VK, Grover S. Assessing the adhesion of putative indigenous probiotic lactobacilli to human colonic epithelial cells. The Indian journal of medical research. 2011. Nov;134(5):664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim JA, Bayo J, Cha J, Choi YJ, Jung MY, Kim DH, et al. Investigating the probiotic characteristics of four microbial strains with potential application in feed industry. PLoS One. 2019. Jun 26;14(6):e0218922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kanamarlapudi SL, Muddada S. Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Streptococcus thermophilus CC30. BioMed research international. 2017. Jul 26;2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/4201809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jadhav S, Gulati V, Fox EM, Karpe A, Beale DJ, Sevior D, et al. Rapid identification and source-tracking of Listeria monocytogenes using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. International journal of food microbiology. 2015. Jun 2;202:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, Virdi JS. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Frontiers in microbiology. 2015. Aug 5;6:791. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang H, Yan Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Qi W. Production and characterization of antifungal compounds produced by Lactobacillus plantarum IMAU10014. PloS one. 2012. Jan 19;7(1):e29452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Magnusson J, Schnürer J. Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. coryniformis strain Si3 produces a broad-spectrum proteinaceous antifungal compound. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2001. Jan 1;67(1):1–5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.1-5.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Prema P, Smila D, Palavesam A, Immanuel G. Production and characterization of an antifungal compound (3-phenyllactic acid) produced by Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2010. Jun;3(3):379–86. doi: 10.1007/s11947-008-0127-1 22276116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Barigela A, Bhukya B. Probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici strain from tomato pickle displays anti-cancer activity and alleviates gut inflammation in-vitro. 3 Biotech. 2021. Jan;11(1):1–1. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02570-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Noriega L, Cuevas I, Margolles A, Clara G. Deconjugation and bile salts hydrolase activity by Bifidobacterium strains with acquired resistance to bile. International dairy journal. 2006. Aug 1;16(8):850–5. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Anandharaj M, Sivasankari B, Santhanakaruppu R, Manimaran M, Rani RP, Sivakumar S. Determining the probiotic potential of cholesterol-reducing Lactobacillus and Weissella strains isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) and south Indian fermented koozh. Research in microbiology. 2015. Jun 1;166(5):428–39. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bhukya KK, Bhukya B. Unraveling the probiotic efficiency of bacterium Pediococcus pentosaceus OBK05 isolated from buttermilk: An in vitro study for cholesterol assimilation potential and antibiotic resistance status. Plos one. 2021. Nov 4;16(11):e0259702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Prabhurajeshwar C, Chandrakanth K. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties and their substances against pathogenic bacteria in-vitro by probiotic Lactobacilli strains isolated from commercial yoghurt. Clinical Nutrition Experimental. 2019. Feb 1;23:97–115. doi: 10.1016/j.yclnex.2018.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Das AJ, Das MJ, Miyaji T, Deka SC. Growth and metabolic characterization of four lactic acid bacteria species isolated from rice beer prepared in Assam, India. Access Microbiology. 2019;1(4). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fonseca HC, de Sousa Melo D, Ramos CL, Dias DR, Schwan RF. Probiotic properties of lactobacilli and their ability to inhibit the adhesion of enteropathogenic bacteria to Caco-2 and HT-29 cells. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins. 2021. Feb;13(1):102–12. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09659-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tuo Y, Yu H, Ai L, Wu Z, Guo B, Chen W. Aggregation and adhesion properties of 22 Lactobacillus strains. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013. Jul 1;96(7):4252–7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Al Seraih A, Belguesmia Y, Cudennec B, Baah J, Drider D. In silico and experimental data claiming safety aspects and beneficial attributes of the bacteriocinogenic strain Enterococcus faecalis B3A-B3B. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins. 2018. Sep;10(3):456–65. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9357-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Garcia EF, Luciano WA, Xavier DE, da Costa WC, de Sousa Oliveira K, Franco OL, et al. Identification of lactic acid bacteria in fruit pulp processing byproducts and potential probiotic properties of selected Lactobacillus strains. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016. Aug 30;7:1371. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dušková M, Šedo O, Kšicová K, Zdráhal Z, Karpíšková R. Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS. International journal of food microbiology. 2012. Oct 1;159(2):107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nacef M, Chevalier M, Chollet S, Drider D, Flahaut C. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a French cheese: The Maroilles. International journal of food microbiology. 2017. Apr 17;247:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bulgasem BY, Lani MN, Hassan Z, Yusoff WM, Fnaish SG. Antifungal activity of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from natural honey against pathogenic Candida species. Mycobiology. 2016. Dec 1;44(4):302–9. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2016.44.4.302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jang SJ, Lee K, Kwon B, You HJ, Ko G. Vaginal lactobacilli inhibit growth and hyphae formation of Candida albicans. Scientific reports. 2019. May 31;9(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44579-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.El-Mokhtar MA, Hassanein KM, Ahmed AS, Gad GF, Amin MM, Hassanein OF. Antagonistic activities of cell-free supernatants of lactobacilli against extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2020;13:543. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S235603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okkers DJ, Dicks LM, Silvester M, Joubert JJ, Odendaal HJ. Characterization of pentocin TV35b, a bacteriocin‐like peptide isolated from Lactobacillus pentosus with a fungistatic effect on Candida albicans. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1999. Oct;87(5):726–34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00918.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dieuleveux V, Van Der Pyl D, Chataud J, Gueguen M. Purification and characterization of anti-Listeria compounds produced by Geotrichum candidum. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1998. Feb 1;64(2):800–3. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.2.800-803.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Evidente A, Lazzaroni S, Corsetti A, Gobbetti M. Purification and characterization of novel antifungal compounds from the sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum strain 21B. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000. Sep 1;66(9):4084–90. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.9.4084-4090.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu J, Huang R, Song Q, Xiong H, Ma J, Xia R, et al. Combinational Antibacterial Activity of Nisin and 3-Phenyllactic Acid and Their Co-production by Engineered Lactococcus lactis. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2021. Feb 5;9:69. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.612105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roudbary M, Kumar S, Kumar A, Černáková L, Nikoomanesh F, Rodrigues CF. Overview on the prevalence of fungal infections, immune response, and microbiome role in COVID-19 patients. Journal of Fungi. 2021. Sep;7(9):720. doi: 10.3390/jof7090720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pushparaj K, Bhotla HK, Arumugam VA, Pappusamy M, Easwaran M, Liu WC, et al. Mucormycosis (black fungus) ensuing COVID-19 and comorbidity meets-Magnifying global pandemic grieve and catastrophe begins. Science of The Total Environment. 2022. Jan 20;805:150355. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pandey M, Bhati A, Priya K, Sharma KK, Singhal B. Precision Postbiotics and Mental Health: the Management of Post-COVID-19 Complications. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2022. Jun;14(3):426–48. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09875-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yoon S, Kim H, Moon HW, Huh HJ, Hur M, Yun YM, et al. A Case of Peritonitis and Disseminated Mucormycosis Caused by Mucor circinelloides in a Patient with Nodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma. Laboratory Medicine Online. 2020;10(3):250–4. doi: 10.3343/lmo.2020.10.3.250 [DOI] [Google Scholar]









