Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 29;52(3):afad011. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad011

Table 3.

Study characteristics of longitudinal studies

First author, year Study duration Sample size Age, mean (SD) Female, number (%) Neuroimaging modality CSVD markers Gait and falls measures Quality score
Baloh, 2003 [63] 8–10 years 59 78.5 (3.7) 25 (42.4%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume and grade (Victoroff scale) GAIT: Tinetti score 7
Briley, 2000 [64] 6–36 months 221 67.6 (10.8) 3 (1%) CT WMH grade (Rotterdam Study scale); infarcts (size, vascular distribution and type [i.e. cortical versus subcortical only]) GAIT: Gait score 6
Callisaya, 2013 [66] 30.6 months, SD 4.9 225 71.4 (6.8) 98 (45.6%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; infarcts (number) GAIT: Speed, step length, cadence, step width, 4.6 m 10
Callisaya, 2014 [82] 12 months 655 74.5 (6.7) 319 (48.7%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; infarcts (number) FALLS: Number of falls 8
Callisaya, 2015 [65] 2.5 years, SD 0.4 187 70.5 (6.5) 68 (50.0%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume GAIT: Speed, 4.6 m
FALLS: Number of falls over 12 months
7
Heiland, 2021 [81] 6.0 years, SD 1.4 331 68.9 (8.3) 198 (58.3%) 1.5T MRI CSVD score (3-point scale), WMH volume, PVS grade, lacune count GAIT: Speed, 2.44 m 9
Kreisel, 2013 [67] 3 years 639 74.1 (5.0) 351 (54.93%) 0.5T and 1.5T MRI ARWMC grade (Fazekas scale) GAIT: SPPB 7
Moscufo, 2012 [68] 1.9 years, SD 0.4 77 82 (4) 46 (60%) 3.0T MRI WMH volume, as % ICV GAIT: Tinetti score; SPPB 9
Pinter, 2018 [69] 3 years 443 72.5 (0.7) 199 (44.9%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume GAIT: Speed, chair stand time, standing balance time, 6 m 8
Rosano, 2005 [70] 4 years 2,450 74.4 (4.7) 1,397 (57%) 0.35T and 1.5T MRI WMH (10-point visual rating scale); Small brain infarcts (presence/absence) GAIT: Motor performance (speed, timed chair stand); self-reported physical impairment (difficulty walking half a mile or with one or more activities of daily living), 15 feet 8
Rosso, 2017 [71] 6 years 2,703 74.4 (4.8) 1,521 (56.3%) 1.5T and 3.0T MRI WMH (10-point visual rating scale) GAIT: Speed, self-reported mobility disability defined as unable to walk 0.8 km, 15 feet 8
Silbert, 2008 [72] 9.1 years, SD 4.0 104 85.1 (5.6) 64 (61.50%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume GAIT: Tinetti score; time to walk, number of steps, 9 m 6
Soumare, 2009 [73] 8 years 1702 72.4 (4.1) 1,031 (60.6%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; lacunar infarcts (presence/absence) GAIT: Time to walk, gait speed; Tinetti score, 6 m 9
Srikanth, 2009 [74] 12 months 294 73.0 (7.0) 131 (44.6%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume GAIT: Speed, cadence, step length, step width, double support time, variability of stride, 4.2 m length, time and width
FALLS: Incident falls (first fall in 12 months after study onset)
8
Sullivan, 2021 [75] 6.51 years 1859 median 76.7, IQR 72.0 to 80.0 1,115 (60%) 3.0T MRI WMH volume; Infarct (presence/absence); CMB (number) GAIT: Speed, 4 m 9
van der Holst, 2017 [77] 5.4 years SD 0.2 310 63.3 (8.4) 137 (44.2%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; lacunes (number); CMB (number) GAIT: Speed, stride length and cadence, 5.6 m 10
van der Holst, 2018 [76] 5.4 SD 0.2 275 62.5 (8.20 120 (43.6%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; lacunes (number); CMB (number) GAIT: Speed, stride length, cadence, 5.6 m 9
Willey, 2013 [78] 2 years 701 80.3 (5.6) 471 (67.2%) 1.5T MRI WMH volume; silent brain infarcts (presence/absence) GAIT: Speed, 4 m 9
Wolfson, 2005 [79] 19–22 months Control: 7; Impaired Mobility: 7 Control: 81 (1.7); Impaired Mobility: 84 (3.4) Control: 1 (14.3%); Impaired Mobility: 4 (57.1%) 1.5T MRI Volume of WM signal abnormalities normalised to ICV GAIT: SPPB; single stance time, tandem stance time, functional base of support and gait velocity 8
Zhang, 2020 [80] 1 year Fallers: 16; Non-fallers: 78 Fallers: 76.6 (7.2); Non-fallers: 68.4 (7.4) Fallers: 7 (43.8%); Non-Fallers: 43 (55.1%) 3.0T MRI WMH grade (Fazekas score) GAIT: Tinetti score, Berg Balance Scale score and TUG test 8

ARWMC, age-related white matter changes; ICV, intracranial volume.