Table 4. Convergent validity results from logistic regression predicting the odds of related variables based on continuous1 QCC-India and QCC-Ethiopia scale scores.
| n (%) | Information Exchange subscale | Interpersonal Relationship subscale | Disrespect and Abuse subscale1 | Full scale | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| p-value | p-value | p-value | p-value | ||
| Highest rating of overall experience with provider: India (n = 313) | 152 (49%) | 3.0 (1.5, 5.9) | 3.7 (1.5, 8.9) | 1.5 (0.8, 3.0) | 1.78 (1.8, 15.0) |
| P = 0.002 | P = 0.004 | P = 0.234 | P = 0.002 | ||
| Highest rating of overall experience with provider: Ethiopia (n = 598) | 163 (27%) | 17.2 (9.6, 30.8) | 49.8 (24.0, 103.3) | 3.2 (1.1, 9.1) | 131.4 (52.0, 332.7) |
| p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | P = 0.033 | p<0.0001 | ||
| Intention to use method selected at baseline: Ethiopia2 (n = 477) | 314 (66%) | 2.0 (1.3, 3.2) | 3.1 (1.8, 5.1) | 2.2 (1.0, 4.6) | 3.4 (1.9, 6.3) |
| p = 0.001 | p<0.0001 | p = 0.045 | p<0.0001 |
1 Disrespect and Abuse score dichotomized into highest score (higher = better quality) versus all else, due to high skew.
2 We did not examine this outcome in India because participants were interviewed within two weeks of their visit, with those initiating method use prioritized for recruitment. Missing data for this outcome are due to some women not having selected a method during their visit in Ethiopia.