Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 17;10:1098231. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1098231

Table 1.

Percentage change of critical nutrients and calorie content of food and beverage purchases applied for each FOPL counterfactual scenario (summary).

Counterfactual scenarios Source Tested foods Main analysis Sensitivity analysis
∆Sodium ∆Sugars ∆Saturated fat ∆Calories
Scenario 1 Based on early FOPL evaluations from Chile (44) Food and beverages overall –4.7% –10.2% –3.9% −3.5%
Scenario 2 Based on early FOPL evaluations from Chile (44) Foods −4.6% −5.4% −3.6% −1.7%
Beverages −5.2% −13.2% −5.6% −9.9%
Scenario 3 Based on a Canadian randomized experimental marketplace study (40) Snack foods −6.3% −0.1% −6.5% −3.0%
Beverages −5.5% −8.7% −19.5% −10.5%
Scenario 4 Based on results from a systematic review and meta-analysis (41) Food & beverages overall −7.8% −7.3% −16.3% −12.9%

Full details of each counterfactual scenario and sensitivity analysis are described in the methods section.