Table 1.
Counterfactual scenarios | Source | Tested foods | Main analysis | Sensitivity analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
∆Sodium | ∆Sugars | ∆Saturated fat | ∆Calories | |||
Scenario 1 | Based on early FOPL evaluations from Chile (44) | Food and beverages overall | –4.7% | –10.2% | –3.9% | −3.5% |
Scenario 2 | Based on early FOPL evaluations from Chile (44) | Foods | −4.6% | −5.4% | −3.6% | −1.7% |
Beverages | −5.2% | −13.2% | −5.6% | −9.9% | ||
Scenario 3 | Based on a Canadian randomized experimental marketplace study (40) | Snack foods | −6.3% | −0.1% | −6.5% | −3.0% |
Beverages | −5.5% | −8.7% | −19.5% | −10.5% | ||
Scenario 4 | Based on results from a systematic review and meta-analysis (41) | Food & beverages overall | −7.8% | −7.3% | −16.3% | −12.9% |
Full details of each counterfactual scenario and sensitivity analysis are described in the methods section.