Table 3.
Model 1 Interaction with Alter Marijuana |
Model 2 Interaction with Ego Marijuana |
Model 3 Interaction with Alter Drinking |
Model 4 Interaction with Ego Drinking |
Model 5 Interaction with Alter Delinquency |
Model 6 Interaction with Ego Delinquency |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arrest | ||||||
Alter arrest (rejection) | −0.155 *** | −0.160 *** | −0.157 *** | −0.164 *** | −0.158 *** | −0.174 *** |
(0.023) | (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.023) | (0.024) | (0.024) | |
Ego arrest (withdrawal) | −0.169 *** | −0.162 *** | −0.175 *** | −0.165 *** | −0.175 *** | −0.167 *** |
(0.026) | (0.026) | (0.027) | (0.026) | (0.027) | (0.026) | |
Arrest similarity (homophily) | −0.227 *** | −0.225 *** | −0.229 *** | −0.229 *** | −0.232 *** | −0.234 *** |
(0.016) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.017) | (0.017) | |
Risky Behaviors | ||||||
Marijuana use | ||||||
Alter marijuana use | −0.038 | −0.034 | −0.028 | −0.028 | −0.029 | −0.027 |
(0.023) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.022) | |
Ego marijuana use | −0.149 *** | −0.160 *** | −0.145 *** | −0.144 *** | −0.145 *** | −0.146 *** |
(0.021) | (0.020) | (0.021) | (0.021) | (0.022) | (0.021) | |
Marijuana use similarity | −0.064 ** | −0.065 ** | −0.057 ** | −0.059 ** | −0.059 ** | −0.058 ** |
(0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | |
Drinking | ||||||
Alter drinking | −0.001 | 0.000 | −0.003 | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
(0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | |
Ego drinking | −0.033 ** | −0.033 ** | −0.034 ** | −0.033 ** | −0.033 ** | −0.032 ** |
(0.010) | (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.010) | (0.010) | |
Drinking similarity | 0.041 ** | 0.041 ** | 0.037 ** | 0.039 ** | 0.041 ** | 0.041 ** |
(0.011) | (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.011) | |
Delinquency | ||||||
Alter delinquency | 0.013 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.012 *** | 0.011 *** |
(0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
Ego delinquency | 0.013 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.014 *** | 0.013 *** | 0.011 ** |
(0.003) | (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.003) | |
Delinquency similarity | 0.234 *** | 0.234 *** | 0.236 *** | 0.241 *** | 0.224 *** | 0.211 *** |
(0.034) | (0.034) | (0.034) | (0.033) | (0.037) | (0.037) | |
Arrest-Behavior Interactions | ||||||
Arrest-Marijuana use | ||||||
Ego arrest × Alter marijuana | 0.282 *** | |||||
(0.054) | ||||||
Alter arrest × Ego marijuana | 0.322 *** | |||||
(0.045) | ||||||
Arrest-Drinking | ||||||
Ego arrest × Alter drinking | 0.144 *** | |||||
(0.026) | ||||||
Alter arrest × Ego drinking | 0.063 | |||||
(0.036) | ||||||
Arrest-Delinquency | ||||||
Ego arrest × Alter delinquency | 0.022 * | |||||
(0.010) | ||||||
Alter arrest × Ego delinquency | 0.034 ** | |||||
(0.009) |
Note. PROSPER Waves 2 to 7. Results are combined across 47 networks using meta-analysis. Rate parameters and estimates for school attendance and attachment, family relations, sensation-seeking, demographics, and network processes are not shown for parsimony.
p<.05;
p<.01;
p<.001 (two-tailed)