Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 31;190:108696. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108696

Table 3.

A comparison of electrodes for the individual determination of FVP and PCT.

Analyte Electrode LDR / μM LOD / nM Ref.
FVP CPT-BDD/GCE 0.064 – 130 18.0 [10]
MnO2-rGO SPE 0.01 – 55 9.0 [11]
DNPs/CPE 0.02 – 1.0 4.83 [12]
GC/MWCNTs + ILCs 0.9 – 150 16.0 [13]
Pt@rGO/GCE 3.16 – 100 2460 [14]
PCT AuNPs/ MWCNT/GCE 0.09 – 35 30 [39]
PEDOT/GO/GCE 10 – 60 570 [40]
Pt/NDG 0.05 – 90 8.0 [41]
GCE/Pd-SB 1.0 – 50 67 [42]
γ-Fe2O3/CNTs 2.5–385 46 [43]
ZnO/FMWCNT/CPE 0.5 – 13 23 [44]
FVP Au@CCB/GNFPE 0.03 – 77.3 8.1 This work
FVP and PCT Au@CCB/GNFPE FVP: 0.03 – 75 7.5
PCT: 0.05 – 50 4.3

Note: LOD (limit of detection) LDR (linear dynamic range), GCE (glassy carbon electrode), PEDOT (poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene), GO (graphene oxide), Pt (platinum), NDG (nitrogen doped graphene), Pd-SB (Pd-Schiff base), CPT-BDD GCE (cathodically pretreated boron-doped diamond glassy carbon electrodes), MnO2-rGO SPE (MnO2-reduced graphene oxide screen-printing electrodes), DNPs/CPE (diamond nanoparticles/carbon paste electrode), GC/MWCNTs + ILCs (glassy carbon / carbon nanotubes-ionic liquid crystals).