Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2017 May 29;31(7):10.1111/ctr.12991. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12991

TABLE 1.

Selected characteristics of patients with ESRD by decisional conflicta score at three large transplant centers (n=464), 2014–2015

Study population N (%) No decisional conflict (score=0) Any decisional conflict (score>0) Significance testingc

Characteristicb N=464 N=239 (51.5) N=225 (48.5) Test statistic P-valued
Demographic characteristics at time of transplant evaluation
 Age, mean±SD, y 50.6±10.2 50.2±10.5 51.1±9.8 −0.92 .36
 Male, n (%) 288 (62.1) 134 (56.1) 154 (68.4) 7.54 .01
 Race/ethnicity, n (%) 13.46 <.01
  African American 221 (47.6) 100 (41.8) 121 (53.8)
  White, non-Hispanic 162 (34.9) 101 (42.3) 61 (27.1)
  White, Hispanic 49 (10.6) 20 (8.4) 29 (12.9)
  Othere 31 (6.7) 17 (7.1) 14 (6.2)
 Institution, n (%) 2.83 .24
  Transplant Center A 158 (34.1) 73 (30.6) 85 (37.8)
  Transplant Center B 143 (30.8) 76 (31.8) 67 (29.8)
  Transplant Center C 163 (35.1) 90 (37.7) 73 (32.4)
Clinical characteristics at time of transplant evaluation
 Comorbidities, n (%)
  Body mass index >35 kg/m2 85 (18.3) 40 (16.7) 45 (20.0) 0.83 .45
  Hypertension 365 (78.7) 187 (78.2) 178 (79.1) 0.05 .82
  Diabetes 176 (37.9) 83 (34.7) 93 (41.3) 2.15 .14
  Cardiovascular disease 43 (9.3) 20 (8.4) 23 (10.2) 0.47 .49
  Albumin <3.5 g/dL 81 (17.4) 36 (15.1) 45 (20.0) 2.34 .13
 Type of dialysis, n (%) 1.32 .52
  Not on dialysis 152 (32.8) 83 (34.7) 69 (30.7)
  Hemodialysis 239 (51.5) 122 (51.1) 117 (52.0)
  Peritoneal dialysis 73 (15.7) 34 (14.2) 39 (17.3)
 Time on dialysis prior to evaluation, n (%) 5.03 .08
  Not on dialysis 152 (32.8) 83 (34.7) 69 (30.7)
  <1 y on dialysis 156 (33.6) 87 (36.4) 69 (30.7)
  ≥1 y on dialysis 156 (33.6) 69 (28.9) 87 (38.7)
Self-reported socioeconomic characteristics at time of transplant evaluation
 Married, n (%) 273 (58.8) 153 (64.0) 120 (53.3) 5.78 .02
 Social supportf, n (%) 250 (53.9) 132 (55.2) 118 (52.4) 1.19 .27
 Educational attainment, n (%) 22.16 <.01
  8th grade or less 11 (2.4) 4 (1.7) 7 (3.1)
  Some high school 26 (5.6) 9 (3.8) 17 (7.6)
  High school diploma or GED 111 (23.9) 41 (17.2) 70 (31.1)
  Some college or vocational school degree 130 (28.0) 71 (29.7) 59 (26.2)
  College or vocational school degree 109 (23.5) 60 (25.1) 49 (21.8)
  Professional or graduate degree 71 (15.3) 49 (20.5) 22 (9.8)
 Employment status, n (%) 6.65 .04
  Employed 180 (38.8) 106 (44.4) 74 (32.9)
  Unemployed 171 (36.9) 80 (33.5) 91 (40.4)
  Retired 104 (22.4) 48 (20.1) 56 (24.9)
 Primary health insurance status, n (%) 7.57 .01
  Private 264 (56.9) 150 (62.8) 114 (50.7)
  Government 194 (41.8) 85 (35.6) 109 (48.4)
 Health literacy scoreg, mean±SD 3.6±2.1 4.0±1.9 3.2±2.1 4.37 <.01
 Numeracy scoreh, mean±SD 6.1±3.2 6.6±3.2 5.6±3.2 3.32 <.01
 Transplant knowledgei, mean±SD 5.0±2.1 5.5±2.0 4.5±2.2 5.23 <.01
 ESRD treatment preference, n (%) 18.8 <.01
  Kidney transplant 346 (74.6) 190 (79.5) 156 (69.3)
  Dialysis 98 (21.1) 48 (20.1) 50 (22.2)
  Don’t know 16 (3.5) 0 16 (7.1)

ESRD, end-stage renal disease; IQR, interquartile range.

a

O’Connor.16

b

Percentages may not all add up to 100% due to missing data. Covariates with missing data: race (n=1); albumin <3.5 g/dL (n=17); marital status (n=5); social support (n=41); educational attainment (n=6); employment status (n=8); primary health insurance status (n=6); household income before taxes (n=8); literacy (n=22); numeracy (n=22); ESRD treatment preference (n=4).

c

By chi-square (categorical variables) or t-value (continuous variables).

d

Bolded values indicate statistically significant differences at alpha <0.05

e

Includes Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Middle Eastern, East Indian, and multiracial.

f

Defined as at least one family member or friend accompanying the patient at transplant evaluation.

g

Literacy score calculated using Newest Vital Sign, NVS, on a scale from 0 to 6.

h

Numeracy score calculated using the Lipkus scale, on a scale from 0 to 11.

i

Transplant Knowledge calculated using a 8-item questionnaire administered to patients prior to seeing a transplant nephrologist/surgeon at their transplant evaluation, on a scale from 0 to 9.