Table 2.
Study | Question | Finding |
---|---|---|
Comparison of the clinical outcome after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer between Japanese and Caucasian men (2006) | Asked if there was a difference in the effectiveness of hormonal therapy in patients with prostate cancer among Japanese and White Americans |
• Japanese American Men who had received hormonal treatment had a better outcome than White men for overall and cause-specific survival rate • Race was one of the significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis |
Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Survival of Older Men Treated for Locoregional Prostate Cancer (2009) | Asked if there were survival differences between racial groups that received ADT | • Authors found that the receipt of ADT was significantly lower in Black men (24%) relative to White (27%), Asian (34%), and Hispanic men (28.7%) (P < 0.05) |
Trends and Racial Differences in the Use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer (2010) | Authors wanted to see whether there were racial variations to use of ADT and time to receipt of ADT in metastatic prostate cancer | • Authors concluded that Black men with metastatic prostate cancer were significantly less likely to receive ADT and, when treated, had a slightly longer time to receipt than White men |
Racial differences in time from prostate cancer diagnosis to treatment initiation (2013) | Asked if there was a difference between time from diagnosis to treatment in Black and White prostate cancer patients | • Authors concluded that AA patients with prostate cancer experienced longer time from diagnosis to treatment than White patients with prostate cancer, including with advanced systemic care |
Racial/Ethnic Disparity in Treatment for Prostate Cancer: Does Cancer Severity Matter? (2016) | Authors attempted to determine whether there was variation in the receipt of treatment based on race and disease severity |
• Compared to White men, Black men sig less likely to receive treatment across all Gleason scores and all D’Amico risk classifications • Hispanic men less likely to receive treatment for G7 + disease and for int/high-risk disease • Asian men are no different from reference |
Racial Disparity in Delivering Definitive Therapy for Intermediate/High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Facility Features and Socioeconomic Characteristics (2018) | Authors reviewed the NCDB database between 2004 and 2013 to examine facility level variations in the use of definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer between different racial groups | • After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, investigators found that most facilities favored definitive therapy in White prostate cancer patients compared to their Black counterparts |
Racial differences in patterns of treatment among men diagnosed with de novo advanced prostate cancer: A SEER-Medicare investigation (2019) | Investigators queried SEER to examine treatment patterns for metastatic and CR prostate cancer and stratified by race determine whether there is a difference in adherence to standard of care treatment in advanced prostate cancer |
• Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were more likely to go without treatment (P < 0.001) compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients, even after accounting for early mortality and TNM stage • The frequency of nearly all forms of treatment was lower among NHB with the exception of orchiectomy, which was significantly higher (10.1% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001) |
Racial differences in the treatment and outcomes for prostate cancer in Massachusetts (2021) | Investigators examined whether prostate cancer outcomes were different in Massachusetts, which was the earliest US state to mandate universal insurance coverage (in 2006) | • Despite lower odds of definitive treatment, Black men with prostate cancer experience reduced cancer-specific mortality in comparison with White men in Massachusetts |