Table 3.
Study design Country | Setting age (in years of participants) | Intervention | Follow up | Outcomes | Relevant findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chan et al (2014)46
prospective case- series intervention
study Taiwan |
Outpatient department Mean age 75.6 ± 6.1 | Medication safety review clinic (MSRC) for solving drug related problems (DRPs) among older adults prescribed multiple medications | 24 weeks | Patients who had at least one unsolved DRP Changes in the number of total medications Changes in physical functioning Patients satisfaction between weeks 1 and 24 |
40 unsolved DRPs at week 24. The mean number of chronic medications decreased by 0.4 Unexpected functional decline of 0.5 points Percentage of participants rating their general health as good or better, increased from 22% to 38% in 24 weeks |
Gallagher et al (2011)10 A randomized controlled trial UK |
Hospital Cork University Hospital Age range ≥65years |
Screening of hospitalized older patients’ medication against STOPP/START criteria for PIM/PPO and providing recommendations to the attending medical team | 6 months | Medication appropriateness index (MAI) Frequency of unnecessary polypharmacy Prevalence of fall Prevalence of all-cause mortality Length of hospital stay Rate of PIM assessed using STOPP/START criteria |
Lower MAI scores at discharge than at admission (absolute
risk reduction 35.7%) Reduction in unnecessary polypharmacy (from 20.0% at admission to 5.4% at discharge Non-significant reduction in falls and in all-cause mortality during 6-month follow up STOPP/START PIM increased gradually during the follow up period in both groups |
Gillespie et al (2009)43 A randomized controlled trial Sweden |
Hospital University Hospital with follow up in community Age range ≥ 80 years Follow up: 12 months |
Interventions provided by ward-based pharmacist: Medication
reconciliation Performance of drug review Provision of advice to patient’s physician Patients education and monitoring, Patient counseling at discharge Follow up telephone call two months after discharge |
12 months | Frequency of hospital visits during a 12-month follow up period | Intervention group vs control group: 16% reduction in all
visits to the hospital and a 47% reduction in visits to the
emergency department Drug related readmissions were reduced by 80% |
Sellors et al (2003)42 A randomized controlled trial Canada |
Primary care 24 sites of family practices Age range ≥ 65 years |
Pharmacists conducted face-to-face medication reviews with
patients in the intervention group. Then gave written
recommendations to the physicians Hepler and Strand definitions of DRPs was used |
5 months | Number of DRP identified in the intervention
arm Proportion of the recommendations implemented by the physicians |
Mean of 2.5 DRPs identified in the intervention
group No statistically significant difference in number of medicines, or health care use between groups Physicians implemented/attempted to implement 72.3% of recommendations. |
Wang et al (2013)44 Randomized control study Taiwan |
Community Age range ≥ 65 years |
Medication safety program including a coach, and reminders
by well-trained volunteers, two home visits and five
telephone calls over a two-month period Both groups received routine medication safety instructions for their chronic illness |
2 months | Medication safety knowledge Medication safety attitude |
After two months of coaching the intervention group demonstrated higher scores than the control group with regard to medication safety knowledge but no significant difference in attitudes scores between two groups |