Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;18(16):e1339–e1347. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00642

Table 6. Results comparison with similar devices.

Beyar et al29 PRECISE21 CORA-PCI22 Smitson et al19 PRECISION Registry* R-EVOLUTION
System used RNS CorPath 200 CorPath 200 CorPath GRX CorPath GRX R-One
Number of sites, n 1 9 n/r 1 20 6
Patients, n 18 164 108 40 980 62
Complex lesions, % n/r 31.7 78.3 77.8 68.8 25.0
Technical success, % 83.3 98.8 91.7 90.0 86.5 95.2
Clinical success, % 100 97.6 99.1 97.5 97.8 100
MACE, % (follow-up) 0 (in-hospital) 0 (30 days) 0.9 (in-hospital) n/r 0 (in-hospital) 0 (30 days)
Total procedure time, min 44 n/r 44.5 40.2 54.3 39.9
Total robotic procedure time, min n/r 24.4 n/r n/r n/r 19.9
Mean fluoroscopy time, min 8.8 11.1 18.2 17.4 17.8 10.3
Mean contrast injection volume, mL n/r 144.2 183.4 171 118.2 118.3
Mean patient radiation exposure, mGy n/r 1,500 n/r n/r n/r 540.3
Mean reduction in operator radiation exposure with lead protection, % n/r n/r n/r n/r n/r 84.5
Median reduction in operator radiation exposure, % n/r 95.2 n/r n/r n/r 100 (under lead) 86.07 (on lead)
*(Medranda GA, Waksman R. Safety and Efficacy of the Second-Generation Robotic Assisted Systems for PCI. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2 July 2021; https://scai.org/safety-and-efficacy-second-generation-robotic-assisted-systems-pci-coverage-late-breaking-science. [Last accessed 7 Dec 2022]). MACE: major adverse cardiac event; mGy: milligray; n/r: not reported; RNS: remote navigation system