Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 19;4:CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub2

Comparison 5.

Doffing with double gloves vs doffing with single gloves

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Contamination: virus detected 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 All body parts 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Face 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Shirt 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Pants 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Contamination: virus quantity 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Dominant hand 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Non-dominant hand 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Face 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Shirt 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.5 Pants 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Non-compliance: any error 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected