Methods | Randomized two parallel groups; simulation study | |
---|---|---|
Participants | N = 8, nurses (6), physicians 2; women 7/8 Intervention: 4 Control: 4 Volunteer healthcare providers, no further details provided Location: USA |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: Commercially available PPE: neck-to-ankle coverall (type not reported), water impermeable surgical gown, knee length impermeable leggings, Stryker hood, double gloves with outer arm-length surgical gloves, N95 masks; meeting CDC recommendations; each participant was assisted in PPE donning by an experienced trainer. Control: Local readily available attire: two plastic gowns worn over the front and the back of the torso, rain-suit pants and hood, spark-shield as face-cover, ankle length shoe covers, double gloves with outer arm-length surgical gloves, N95 masks; meeting CDC recommendations; each participant was assisted in PPE donning by an experienced trainer. |
|
Outcomes | Contamination: measured in ml of fluorescent agent with LED black light after doffing. Random order of two types of exposure: high volume or standard. High volume meant 100 ml of fluorescent agent splashed on the torso. Standard meant working on a manikin contaminated with fluorescent agent. Fluorescent liquid mimicked body fluids and consisted of fluorescent powder, clothes detergent, fluorescent tablets |
|
Notes | No funding or conflict of interest reported Apparently tape was used to put attire together; this resulted in more difficult doffing but no figures reported; costs of locally available equipment was 36 US dollars, that of commercial material not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “randomized to one of two PPE ensembles” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | no incomplete outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Contamination outcomes reported but no separate outcomes for high or normal exposure, however small sample and no statistical analysis by study authors |
Other bias | Low risk | No indication |