Table 2.
Results of differential abundance analysis.
| OTUs names (specific number) | Log₂ fold change: log(FC) in COVID-19 vs healthy | Taxonomy |
|---|---|---|
| Positive abundances | ||
| s__mucilaginosa, (1017181) | 9.82563 | Rothia mucilaginosa |
| g__Blautia,(174009) | 6.41008 | Blautia |
| g__Streptococcus, (2024840) | 5.50363 | Streptococcus |
| s__anginosus, (1888677) | 4.14302 | Streptococcus anginosus |
| Negative abundances | ||
| s__prausnitzii, (189937) | −3.105632 | Faecalibacterium prausnitzii |
| f__Clostridiaceae, (180516) | −3.695406 | Clostridiaceae |
| g__Dorea, (189559) | −3.86359 | Dorea |
| s__adolescentis, (235262) | −7.172547 | Bifidobacterium adolescentis |
| g__SMB53, (555945) | −9.061805 | SMB53 |
Positive abundances indicate that OTUs has the highest log(FC) in COVID-19; Negative abundances indicate that OTUs has the highest log(FC) in healthy individuals; f, family level; g, genus level; s, species level.