Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;13(3):e066909. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066909

Table 3.

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of 368 patients with RCC included in the ReLife study and 468 invited non-participants

Participants Non-participants P value*
N 368 468
Age category (years)
 18–44 14 (4) 28 (6) 0.34
 45–64 180 (49) 218 (47)
 65–75 174 (47) 222 (47)
Sex
 Male 257 (70) 360 (77) 0.02
 Female 111 (30) 108 (23)
Tumour stage
 I 238 (65) 298 (64) 0.51
 II 55 (15) 61 (13)
 III 75 (20) 109 (23)
Fuhrman grade
 1 49 (13) 86 (18) 0.32
 2 185 (50) 219 (47)
 3 67 (18) 74 (16)
 4 23 (6) 33 (7)
 Unknown 44 (12) 56 (12)
Morphology 0.97
 Clear cell renal tumour 260 (71) 338 (72)
 Papillary renal tumour 48 (13) 58 (12)
 Chromophobe renal tumour 25 (7) 30 (6)
 Other† 35 (9) 42 (9)
Treatment
 Radical nephrectomy 210 (57) 272 (58) 0.76
 Partial nephrectomy 152 (41) 191 (41)
 Ablation‡ 6 (2) 5 (1)

Values are n (%).

*From χ2 test.

†Other morphology consists of adenocarcinoma with mixed subtypes (n=4 and n=5), eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (n=1 and n=0), renal cell carcinoma not otherwise specified (n=28 and n=29), sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (n=2 and n=6), collecting duct carcinoma (n=0 and n=1) and clear cell papillary renal cell tumour (n=0 and n=1) for participants and non-participants, respectively.

‡Other treatment consists of cryoablation (n=2 and n=2), radiofrequency ablation (n=3 and n=2) and microwave ablation (n=1 and n=1) for participants and non-participants, respectively.

RCC, renal cell cancer; ReLife, Renal cell cancer: Lifestyle, prognosis and quality of life.