Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3:1–16. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01304-6

Table 4.

Effectiveness of social media-based interventions on weight percentage, waist circumference, fat and physical activity.

Outcomes No. of trials Sample size Statistical method & Analysis model MD (95% CI) Overall effect I2 Effect size g (95% CI)
Z P-value
Weight percentage (%) 10 792 IV & D-Laird & Random effects −0.35 (−1.60, 0.91) −0.54 0.59 63% −0.08 (−0.34, 0.17)
Waist circumference (cm) 8 1139 IV & D-Laird & Random effects −1.96 (−3.22, −0.70) −3.06 <0.001*** 52.80% −0.33 (−0.58, −0.09)
Body fat mass (kg) 4 266 IV & D-Laird & Random effects −3.11 (−5.23, −1.00) −2.88 <0.001*** 85.03% −0.85 (−1.11, −0.59)
Body fat percentage (%) 4 613 IV & D-Laird & Random effects −2.78 (−5.99, 0.42) −1.70 0.09 84% −0.42 (−0.92, 0.08)
Energy intake (kcal/day) 8 680 IV & D-Laird & Random effects −9.95 (−99.45, 0.22) −0.22 0.83 0% <−0.001 (−0.15, −0.03)
Physical activity (steps/day) 4 274 IV & D-Laird & Random effects 1510 (259, 2761) 2.37 0.02* 77.27% 0.75 (−0.09, 1.58)
MVPA (minutes/day) 5 240 IV & D-Laird & Random effects 1.45 (−6.27, 9.18) 0.37 0.71 31.65% 0.06 (−0.24, 0.36)

CI Confidence Interval, D-Laird DerSimonian and Laird analysis model, g Hedges’s g (effect size); I 2 Heterogeneity, IV Inverse variance statistical method, kcal calorie, MD mean difference, min minutes, MVPA Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, N sample size, random random effects model, ref reference list, Z z-statistics.

***P < 0.001; *P < 0.05.