Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;2022:8372012. doi: 10.1155/2022/8372012

Table 2.

The correlation between injury mechanisms and injury sites.

AIS1 AIS3 AIS4 AIS5 p value
A 1.9 ± 1.8a 2.1 ± 1.6b 1.5 ± 1.6a,b 1.5 ± 1.3a,b <0.001
B 2.6 ± 2.0a 1.6 ± 1.5a,b 0.9 ± 1.4a,b,c 1.7 ± 1.4a,c <0.001
C 3.1 ± 1.9a 1.6 ± 1.6a,b 0.6 ± 1.3a,b 0.9 ± 1.5a <0.001
D 2.4 ± 2.0a 1.9 ± 1.7b 1.0 ± 1.3a,b,c 2.1 ± 1.7c <0.001
E 2.5 ± 2.0a 1.9 ± 1.8a,b 1.1 ± 1.4a,b,c 1.5 ± 1.5a,b,c <0.001
F 3.9 ± 1.6a 0.5 ± 1.4a 0.3 ± 0.9a 0.4 ± 1.0a <0.001
G 2.1 ± 2.2a 1.6 ± 1.6 1.2 ± 1.7 0.8 ± 1.5a 0.021
I 0.5 ± 1.6a 2.0 ± 1.5a 1.8 ± 1.5a 2.6 ± 1.6a <0.001

A, car accident; B, motorcycle accident; C, bicycle accident; D, pedestrian accident; E, fall down; F, slip and rolling down; G, crush; H, assault; I, others; AIS, abbreviated injury scale; AIS1, head and neck AIS; AIS3, chest AIS; AIS4, intra-abdominopelvic organ AIS; AIS5, extremity and pelvic bone AIS. aSignificant difference was observed between AIS1 and AIS3 or AIS4 or AIS5 as a result of post hoc analysis. bSignificant difference was observed between AIS3 and AIS4 or AIS5 as a result of post hoc analysis. cSignificant difference was observed between AIS4 and AIS5 as a result of post hoc analysis.