Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;2023(4):CD004873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004873.pub6

Nicholas 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, open controlled trial
Participants were randomly allocated to control and treatment groups using a random sequence number.
Participants Infants admitted to the hospital with a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchiolitis and with respiratory distress severe enough to require nasogastric tube feeding or intravenous fluids
N = 50 participants randomised and analysed: 24 were allocated to control group and 26 to treatment group. Mean age of control group: 3.2 (range 0.4 to 8.3); intervention group 2.4 (range 0.4 to 6.9). RSV+: control 79%, intervention 85%
Interventions Group 1: vibration and postural drainage techniques twice a day (N = 26)
Group 2: no intervention (N = 24)
In the physiotherapy arm, the infant was treated on the physiotherapist's knee, percussion and vibration lying on right side, lying on the left side, and sitting; suction performed after on each side, if necessary, until clear; no oxygen required during treatment. Modifications were allowed if infant could not tolerate the procedure. Oxygen was allowed depending on infant tolerability.
Outcomes Primary outcome: validated clinical score (Dick 1991) with values 0 to 20, assigning scores 0 to 2 to heart rate, respiratory rate, blood gases, rhinitis, hyperinflation, use of accessory muscles, recession, cough, wheeze, crackles
Secondary outcomes: length of stay (days); provision of inspired oxygen; requirement for nasogastric feeding; oxygen saturation
Notes The study ended at 5 days or if the infant was transferred to the ICU.
Authors did not report SD.
No information on funding
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "random sequence number generated by the Medical Statistics Unit of the University of Edinburgh"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk 50 participants were randomised and assessed, although 1 child was excluded from the trial after being admitted to the ICU. It is not clear how these data were treated. Saturation of oxygen pulse assessments comprised 2 excluded children who were not assessed for clinical outcomes.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not described
Other bias Low risk No other biases detected.