Table 3.
Selected flavonoids of S. littoralis Hassk. in cosmetic properties based on in silico activity.
| Cosmetic properties | The main mechanism | Selected flavonoids | In silico activity | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant activity |
|
Catechin | Catechin binds five enzymes that are responsible for ROS: NADPH oxidase (PDB: 2CDU), cytochrome P450 (CP450) (PDB: 1OG5), myeloperoxidase (MP) (PDB: 1DNU), and XO; the docking scores are -6.75; -5.78; -5.19; and -7.83 kcal.mol-1 respectively. Those docking scores are lower than dextromethorphan (DEX) as the positive control. The interaction patterns of catechin and the binding site of the enzyme are: 1. NADPH oxidase→ hydrogen bonds: Asp179, Tyr188, Val214; and pi–c: Lys187. 2. Cytochrome P450 →hydrogen bond: Ser365; pi–pi: Phe476. 3. Myeloperoxidase →hydrogen bond: Asn186, Arg188, Asn189, Phe213. 4. Xanthine oxidase →HB: Glu802, Thr1010; pi–pi: Phe914, Phe1009. |
(Kritsi et al., 2022) |
| Daidzein | The binding energy of docked complex with Catalase as an antioxidant protein was found to be -100.665 kcal.mol-1. The interaction residues for Catalase were ARG-72, ARG-112, TYR-358, HIS-75, GLY-147, ASN-148, PHE-153, ARG-354, TYR-358, ASP-389, ASN-403, ARG-68, GLU-330, GLU-71, GLU-119, and ARG-170. | (Tidke et al., 2018) | ||
| Formononetin | Docking score for formononetin from vegetal extract to bind glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) (protein target) is -6.547 kcal.mol-1. | (Costea et al., 2022) | ||
| Glycitein | The binding energy of docked complex with Catalase as an antioxidant protein was found to be -97.5342 kcal.mol-1. The interaction residues for Catalase were ARG-72, ARG-112, TYR-358, HIS-75, GLY-147, ASN-148, PHE-153, ARG-354, TYR-358, ASP-389, ASN-403, ARG-68, GLU-330, GLU-71, GLU-119, and ARG-170. | (Tidke et al., 2018) | ||
| Luteolin | Luteolin binds ROS with a docking score of -8.3 kcal.mol-1. Residue interactions were LYS1980, ALA1978, LEU2026, LEU2086, VAL1959. | (Syamsul et al., 2022) | ||
| Apigenin | Docking score for apigenin from vegetal extract to bind GPX4 (protein target) is -6.918 kcal.mol-1. | (Costea et al., 2022) | ||
| Hesperetin | Hesperetin from citrus demonstrated good binding energies for the target enzymes, such as β-site amyloid precursor protein (APP) cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and AChE with binding energies -8.3; -8.4 kcal.mol-1 respectively. | (Lee et al., 2018) | ||
| Naringenin | Docking score for naringenin from vegetal extract to bind GPX4 (protein target) is -6.048 kcal.mol-1. | (Costea et al., 2022) | ||
| Anti-inflammatory activity |
|
Catechin | Catechin binds four target proteins:
|
(Khan et al., 2022b) |
| Daidzein | Daidzein binds COX-1 with binding energy -110.38 kcal.mol-1. The main residues of interactions for COX-1 were GLN-44, GLN-42, HIS-43, THR-206, ASN-382, ALN-203, GLN-203, HIS-207, PHE-210, HIS-388, LYS-468, ARG-469. | (Tidke et al., 2018) | ||
| Formononetin | Formononetin binds TNF-α with a docking score of -7.626 kcal.mol-1. | (Costea et al., 2022) | ||
| Glycitein | Glycitein binding COX-1 with binding energy -104.35 kcal.mol-1. The main residues of interactions for COX-1 were GLN-44, GLN-42, HIS-43, THR-206, ASN-382, ALN-203, GLN-203, HIS-207, PHE-210, HIS-388, LYS-468, ARG-469. | (Tidke et al., 2018) | ||
| Luteolin | Following docking investigations, luteolin binds to the catalytic iron atom in 5-LOX and generates stabilizing hydrogen bonds with His367 and Thr364. Luteolin binding ACE-2 with binding energy -8.9 kcal.mol-1. |
(Kutil et al., 2014) (Alzaabi et al., 2022) |
||
| Apigenin | Apigenin binding ACE-2 with binding energy -8.5 kcal.mol-1. | (Alzaabi et al., 2022) | ||
| Hesperetin | Hesperetin functions as an in silico inhibitor of the SARS spike glycoprotein-Human ACE2 complex with an affinity of -9.2 kcal.mol-1. | (Cheke et al., 2021) | ||
| Naringenin | Naringenin binds ACE-2 with binding energy -8.5 kcal.mol-1. | (Alzaabi et al., 2022) | ||
| Tyrosinase inhibitor |
|
Catechin | Catechin had a lower docking score (-9.58 kcal.mol-1) than the inhibitor kojic acid (-7.99 kcal.mol-1) when it came to binding to the active site of the tyrosinase enzyme. Tyrosinase was the target protein, and catechin's binding energy to it was -7.64 kcal.mol-1 via H-bond (HIS296). Compared to kojic acid, the energy value was lower (-5.03 kcal.mol-1). It proved that kojic acid and catechin have different levels of affinity. |
(Abdelfattah et al., 2022) (Laksmiani et al., 2020) |
| Daidzein | Daidzein isolated from the root of Pueraria lobata inhibited mushroom tyrosinase activity with a docking score of -7.09 kcal.mol-1. The docking score is lower than the positive control (kojic acid), -5.5 kcal.mol-1. | (Wagle et al., 2019) | ||
| Luteolin | The binding energy of luteolin on tyrosinase enzyme was -6.19 kcal.mol-1 which was lower than kojic acid (-5.5 kcal.mol-1). The interactions that occur are H-bond interaction (Cys83, Gly245, Ala246, Val248), electrostatic interaction (Glu322), and hydrophobic interaction (His85 and Val248). Luteolin binds the mushroom tyrosinase with a docking score-7.9 kcal.mol-1. The hydroxyl group on Ring B of luteolin formed H-bond with Glu322. |
(Wagle et al., 2018) (Jakimiuk et al., 2021) |
||
| Hesperetin | Hesperetin chelates a copper ion that combines with three histidine residues (HIS259, HIS85, and HIS61) within the active site to inhibit tyrosinase in the competitive pathway (KI=4.030±26 mM). | (Si et al., 2012) | ||
| Naringenin | Naringenin is a similar compound to 2S-Pinocembrin which has one H-bond on the active site of the tyrosinase enzyme. | (Lall et al., 2016) | ||
| Elastase inhibitor |
|
Catechin | Catechin had the best docking score (-20.36 kcal.mol-1) on binding the active site of elastase enzyme compared to -13.32 kcal.mol-1 of kojic acid as an inhibitor. Hydrogen bonding interactions with Pro232 and Arg 249 and hydrophobic contacts to Lys233, Lys241, and Val243.Catechin binds MMP1 with binding affinity -8.5 kcal.mol-1. Possible binding sites were ARG214, HIS218, ASN180, SER239. Common residues were HIS218, GLU219, SER239, PRO238, ARG21. Catechin also binds MMP8 with binding affinity -8.8 kcal.mol-1. Possible binding sites were ALA161, VAL194, HIS197, LEU214, TRY219, ASN218, PRO217. Common residues were LEU160, TRY216, ASN218, LEU214, GLU198, PRO217, HIS197, GLU198, ALA161. | (Abdelfattah et al., 2022) (Kose et al., 2020) |
| Luteolin | Luteolin binds MMP8 with a binding affinity was -10.1 kcal.mol-1. Possible binding sites were LEU160, LEU214, PRO217, TYR216, ARG222, GLU198, ALA161. Common residues were LEU160, TRY216, ASN218, LEU214, GLU198, PRO217, HIS197, GLU198, ALA161. Luteolin also binding MMP11 with a binding affinity was -10 kcal.mol-1. Possible sites were HIS219, LEU181, LEU236, SER238, PHE240, TYR241, VAL216, GLN215. Common residues were THR202, ASP200, GLU201, GLN12, GLN209, ASN208, TYR241. | (Kose et al., 2020) | ||
| Apigenin | Apigenin binds MMP2 with a binding affinity was -9 kcal.mol-1. Possible binding sites were VAL198, ILE222, ALA220, PRO215, LEU218, HIS201, TRY223. Common residues were VAL198, ILE222, ALA220, LEU218, LEU197, HIS201, TRY223. | (Kose et al., 2020) | ||
| Naringenin | Naringenin binds MMP8 with binding affinity was ALA112, ASP115, THR224, ARG111, GLU108, SER105. Common residues were LEU160, TRY216, ASN218, LEU214, GLU198, PRO217, HIS197, GLU198, ALA161. | (Kose et al., 2020) | ||
| Collagenase inhibitor |
|
Catechin | Catechin showed strong binding at the active site of collagenase enzyme with a docking score of -12.71 kcal.mol-1. The docking score of catechin is lower than quercetin as the positive control (-12.20 kcal.mol-1) Epigallocatechin gallate binds collagenase with a docking score of -9.93 kcal.mol-1. Hydrogen bonds: Gly158, Leu160, Ala161, Tyr189, Tyr219, Ala220. Hydrophobic interactions: Leu160, His197. Electrostatic interaction: Glu198. |
(Abdelfattah et al., 2022) (Priani and Fakih, 2021) |
| Luteolin | Luteolin binds collagenase with a docking score of -11.0 kcal.mol-1. Residue interactions were LEU235, SER239, VAL215, HIS218, LEU181. | (Syamsul et al., 2022) | ||
| Hyaluronidase inhibitor |
|
Catechin | Catechin contained in Warburgia salutaris bark aqueous extract binding active site on hyaluronidase enzyme with docking score -13.73 kcal.mol-1. The docking score of catechin is lower than kojic acid as the positive control (-9.10 kcal.mol-1). Epigallocatechin gallate binds hyaluronidase enzyme with a docking score of -8.9 kcal.mol-1 via H-bonds (ASP56, ASP111, TRP301, SER304) and hydrophobic interactions (ASP111, GLU113, TRP301). |
(Abdelfattah et al., 2022) (Younis et al., 2022) |
| Daidzein | Daidzein binds energy with an active site in hyaluronidase (-27.08 kJ mol-1). Besides, daidzein binding amino acids via hydrophobic interaction, hydrophilic interaction, and hydrogen bond. | (Zeng et al., 2015) | ||
| Luteolin | Luteolin binds energy with an active site in hyaluronidase (-25.03 kJ mol-1). Besides, daidzein binding amino acids via hydrophobic interaction, hydrophilic interaction, and hydrogen bond. Luteolin binds hyaluronidase with a docking score -6.8 kcal.mol-1. Residue interactions were ASP111, GLU113, TYR55. |
(Zeng et al., 2015) (Syamsul et al., 2022) |
||
| Apigenin | Apigenin binds hyaluronidase enzyme with binding energy-56.15 kcal.mol-1. | (Mumpuni and Mulatsari, 2017) | ||
| Naringenin | Naringenin binds energy with an active site in hyaluronidase (-24.28 kJ mol-1). Besides, daidzein binding amino acids via hydrophobic interaction, hydrophilic interaction, and hydrogen bond. | (Zeng et al., 2015) |