Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 21;10:1088961. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1088961

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for effect of EAT volume on hemodynamically significant CAD.

Variable Multivariate-adjusted Multivariate-adjusted Multivariate-adjusted
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
EAT volume
EAT (per SD) 2.34 (1.74–3.14) <0 . 001 2.78 (1.86–4.15) <0 . 001 2.79 (1.87–4.17) <0 . 001
EAT (per tertile) 2.49 (1.77–3.49) <0 . 001 2.71 (1.75–4.19) <0 . 001 2.74 (1.76–4.29) <0 . 001
Tertiles
Bottom tertilea 1 1 1
Middle tertile 1.65 (0.84–3.22) 0.145 1.77 (0.82–3.83) 0.149 1.62 (0.73–3.57) 0.235
Top tertile 5.86 (3.00–11.43) <0 . 001 6.71 (2.80–16.09) <0 . 001 6.80 (2.78–16.63) <0 . 001

Multivariate-adjusted model 1 was adjusted for age and sex; multivariate-adjusted model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, body surface area, active smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, creatinine, uric acid and coronary artery calcium score; multivariate-adjusted model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, body surface area, active smoking, hypertension, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, creatinine, uric acid and coronary artery calcium score. CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.

Bold value is statistically significant.

a

As control.