Table 6.
Results on colon cancer dataset
| Methods | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F-score | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max-pooling | 0.810 ± 0.013 | 0.870 ± 0.014 | 0.783 ± 0.019 | 0.821 ± 0.019 | 0.910 ± 0.009 |
| Mean-pooling | 0.832 ± 0.012 | 0.867 ± 0.011 | 0.754 ± 0.030 | 0.813 ± 0.015 | 0.902 ± 0.008 |
| Attention [8] | 0.900 ± 0.009 | 0.946 ± 0.013 | 0.851 ± 0.009 | 0.902 ± 0.010 | 0.959 ± 0.008 |
| Gated Attention [8] | 0.890 ± 0.010 | 0.950 ± 0.015 | 0.840 ± 0.029 | 0.899 ± 0.022 | 0.955 ± 0.009 |
| mi-Net Attention [52] | 0.900 ± 0.015 | 0.952 ± 0.011 | 0.850 ± 0.035 | 0.870 ± 0.025 | 0.951 ± 0.015 |
| ELDB [53] | 0.915 ± 0.012 | 0.951 ± 0.010 | 0.855 ± 0.027 | 0.878 ± 0.025 | 0.978 ± 0.010 |
| GA-RBF | 0.894 ± 0.012 | 0.914 ± 0.010 | 0.825 ± 0.026 | 0.871 ± 0.017 | 0.963 ± 0.007 |
| GA-IM | 0.902 ± 0.010 | 0.917 ± 0.008 | 0.807 ± 0.023 | 0.892 ± 0.014 | 0.969 ± 0.008 |
| GA-LA | 0.872 ± 0.009 | 0.920 ± 0.009 | 0.786 ± 0.030 | 0.792 ± 0.035 | 0.953 ± 0.021 |
| S-AGR | 0.906 ± 0.008 | 0.944 ± 0.008 | 0.832 ± 0.015 | 0.887 ± 0.012 | 0.972 ± 0.010 |
| S-AGI | 0.902 ± 0.007 | 0.924 ± 0.010 | 0.867 ± 0.014 | 0.877 ± 0.011 | 0.973 ± 0.008 |
| S-AGL | 0.886 ± 0.008 | 0.923 ± 0.007 | 0.794 ± 0.026 | 0.813 ± 0.012 | 0.965 ± 0.015 |
| S-RIL | 0.915 ± 0.009 | 0.938 ± 0.013 | 0.865 ± 0.010 | 0.876 ± 0.012 | 0.978 ± 0.007 |
| TGA-MIL (ours) | 0.927 ± 0.010 | 0.955 ± 0.015 | 0.881 ± 0.018 | 0.886 ± 0.018 | 0.983 ± 0.009 |
Experiments were repeated five times, with the average (±standard error) provided. The abbreviations in the table have been described in Table 4. The best results for each metric are highlighted in bold