Table 4.
Practice recommendations for domain 3 “evaluation” with steps to implement the recommendation [19, 47, 58, 60–68]
| PR | Steps, options, or solutions to implement each recommendation |
|---|---|
| PR 3.1 Professionals assessing cognitive function should take into account the impact of hearing and vision impairments on cognitive evaluations | Appointment letters should remind patients to bring their best-corrected hearing aids and glasses to the appointments (PPI/PC) |
| Increased awareness of environmental issues (see PR 6.2), that is, conduct testing in a quiet environment, one-on-one, and ensure the individual can see the test administrator’s face and gestures (TF) | |
| If not already undertaken, screening for hearing/vision should be undertaken (see PR 2.2) | |
| Consider which tests/assessment processes for evaluating PwD are suitable given HVC status - validated versions and grading systems of routine cognitive assessments that do not depend on vision and/or hearing are available and should be used if vision/hearing loss suspected [58, 60, 61] | |
| Routine provision of low-cost sensory-corrective devices (i.e., amplifiers and magnifiers) during cognitive testing may aid in obtaining accurate assessments [62, 63] | |
| Bring family members to help recall on the PwD’s history on vision and/or hearing problem (PC/PPI) | |
| Clinicians may need to raise awareness of other conditions and how they impact on assessment to the patient and care giver (PC/PPI) | |
| Give more time during the assessment (PC/PPI) | |
| PR 3.2 Professionals assessing hearing should take into account the impact of vision and cognitive impairments on hearing evaluations | Appointment letters should remind patients to bring their best-corrected glasses to appointments and provide information ahead of time about what to expect at the appointment for hearing assessment (PPI/PC) |
| Increased awareness of environmental issues (see PR 6.2) | |
| Allow adequate time for appointments with opportunities for breaks [19] (PC/PPI) | |
| Consider domiciliary evaluation if appropriate [64] | |
| Include caregiver/family members to help recall on the PwD’s history on hearing problem and allow to accompany during the whole appointment [64] (PC/PPI) | |
| Approach the assessment flexibly, it may be difficult for patients to follow instructions and do things which they once did [19] (PC/PPI) | |
| Consider alternative approaches to assess hearing abilities, such as presenting pulsed tones instead of continuous tones [64] | |
| If cognitive status is unknown and sufficient training has been undertaken, consider asking relevant questions to probe cognitive status or performing adapted or sensory-appropriate versions of cognitive screens before the hearing evaluation to find out the patient’s cognitive status ability to properly perform the evaluation (PC/PPI) | |
| PR 3.3 Professionals assessing vision should take into account the impact of hearing and cognitive impairments on evaluations of vision | Appointment letters should remind patients to bring their best-corrected hearing aids to appointments and provide information ahead of time about what to expect at the appointment for visual assessment (PPI/PC) |
| Increased awareness of environmental issues (see PR 6.2), that is, conduct testing in a quiet environment, one-on-one, and ensure the individual can see the test administrator’s face and gestures (TF) | |
| Allow adequate time for appointments with opportunities for breaks [19] (PC/PPI) | |
| Consider domiciliary evaluation visits if appropriate [19] | |
| Include caregiver/family members to help recall on the PwD’s history on hearing problem and allow to accompany during the whole appointment [64] (PC/PPI) | |
| Consider alternative approaches to assess visual acuity such as Teller Acuity Cards and ETDRS-letter chart that may work across a spectrum of cognitive impairment [65–67] | |
| Guidance for working with patients with visual loss and acquired cognitive impairment or dementia exists. For example, in the UK, the Royal College of Opthalmologists have produced quality statements [68] and the College of Optometrists have produced guidance for examining patients [47] | |
| Routine provision of low-cost amplification devices during testing may aid in obtaining accurate assessments, at minimum when providing instructions [62] | |
| Approach the assessment flexibly; it may be difficult for patients to follow instructions and do things which they once did; consider simple, shorter, objective tests, rather than subjective measures [19] (PC/PPI) | |
| If cognitive status is unknown, and sufficient training has been undertaken, consider asking relevant questions to probe cognitive status or performing adapted or sensory-appropriate versions of cognitive screens before the vision evaluation to find out the patient’s cognitive status ability to properly perform the evaluation (PC/PPI) |
PR, practice recommendation; PwD, people living with dementia; PC/PPI, professional consortia and/or patient and public involvement groups.