Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 27;65(23):235023. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb31c

Table 3.

Summary of APE distribution under different gamma criteria for ACLR and Poisson Lasso models in TV and CV.

Metrics 3%/3 mm
3%/2 mm
2%/2 mm
ACLR, N (%) PL, N (%) ACLR, N (%) PL, N (%) ACLR, N (%) PL, N (%)

TV APE ⩽ 3.5% 386 (90.6) 369 (86.6) 334 (78.4) 304 (71.4) 202 (47.4) 186 (43.7)
APE ⩽ 5% 405 (95.1) 397 (93.2) 375 (88.0) 367 (86.2) 265 (62.2) 247 (58.0)
APE ⩽ 10% 419 (98.4) 415 (97.4) 416 (97.7) 411 (96.5) 385 (90.4) 370 (86.9)
MAE (SD) 1.76% (1.8) 2.10% (2.1) 2.60 (2.4) 3.04 (2.9) 4.66% (3.9) 5.28% (4.6)
CV APE ⩽ 3.5% 135 (90.0) 131 (87.3) 113 (75.3) 102 (68.0) 39 (26.0) 35 (23.3)
APE ⩽ 5% 138 (92.0) 133 (88.6) 134 (89.3) 132 (88.0) 69 (46.0) 53 (35.3)
APE ⩽ 10% 146 (95.3) 143 (95.3) 144 (96.0) 142 (94.7) 147 (98.0) 141 (94)
MAE (SD) 1.73% (1.5) 2.07% (1.7) 2.99% (1.9) 2.36% (2.1) 5.93% (2.3) 7.12% (3.2)

Abbreviations: APE = absolute prediction error; MAE = mean absolute error; SD = standard deviation; ACLR = autoencoder based classification-regression deep learning model; PL = Poisson Lasso; TV = technical validation